Using an experimental methodology, the present study investigated adolescents’ attitudes toward media images of women in non-appearance-focused (CEO and military pilot) and appearance-focused occupations (model and actor). One hundred adolescent girls and 76 adolescent boys provided ratings of likability, competence, and similarity to self after viewing media images of women in non-appearance-focused and appearance-focused occupations. Both boys and girls reported that women in non-appearance-focused occupations were good role models at higher rates than women in appearance-focused occupations. Girls reported greater likability and similarity to the self for women in appearance-focused occupations compared with women in non-appearance-focused occupations, whereas boys showed the opposite pattern. Boys rated women in non-appearance-focused occupations as more competent than women in appearance-focused occupations, whereas girls showed the opposite pattern. The role of internalization of media standards for appearance in teens’ attitudes was also considered. Implications for career identity are discussed.
American Psychological Association. (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html
2.
ArnettJ. J. (1995). Adolescents’ use of media for self-socialization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24, 519-533. doi:10.1007/BF01537054
3.
BartheE. P.LeoneM. C.LateanoT. A. (2013). Commercializing success: The impact of popular media on the career decisions and perceptual accuracy of criminal justice students. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 13-26. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.694099
4.
BlumlerJ. G.KatzE. (1974). The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
5.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
6.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
CejkaM. A.EaglyA. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413-423.
9.
CollinsR. L. (2011). Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go?Sex Roles, 64, 290-298. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5
10.
DanielsE. A. (2012). Sexy versus strong: What girls and women think of female athletes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33, 79-90. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.12.002
11.
DanielsE. A.WartenaH. (2011). Athlete or sex symbol: What boys and men think of media representations of female athletes. Sex Roles, 65, 566-579. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9959-7
12.
DasguptaN.AsgariS. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counterstereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 642-658. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003
13.
DownsE.SmithS. L. (2010). Keeping abreast of hypersexuality: A video game character content analysis. Sex Roles, 62, 721-733. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9637-1
14.
EcclesJ. S. (2011). Understanding educational and occupational choices. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 644-648. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01718.x
15.
EriksonE. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
16.
FredricksonB. L.RobertsT.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173-206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
17.
GraffK. A.MurnenS. K.KrauseA. K. (2013). Low-cut shirts and high-heeled shoes: Increased sexualization across time in magazine depictions of girls. Sex Roles, 69, 571-582. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0321-0
18.
GreenwoodD. N.Dal CinS. (2012). Ethnicity and body consciousness: Black and White American women’s negotiation of media ideals and others’ approval. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 220-235. doi:10.1037/a0029411
19.
GurungR. A. R.ChrouserC. J. (2007). Predicting objectification: Do provocative clothing and observer characteristics matter?Sex Roles, 57, 91-99. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9219-z
20.
HaboushA.WarrenC. S.BenutoL. (2012). Beauty, ethnicity, and age: Does internalization of mainstream media ideals influence attitudes towards older adults?Sex Roles, 66, 668-676. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0102-6
21.
HarrisonK. (1997). Does interpersonal attraction to thin media personalities promote eating disorders?Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 478-500.
22.
HartungP. J.PorfeliE. J.VondracekF. W. (2005). Child vocational development: A review and reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 385-419. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.006
23.
HattonE.TrautnerM. N. (2011). Equal opportunity objectification? The sexualization of men and women on the cover of Rolling Stone. Sexuality & Culture, 14, 256-278. doi:10.1007/s12119-011-9093-2
24.
HeflickN. A.GoldenbergJ. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598-601. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008
25.
HoffnerC. A.LevineK. J.SullivanQ. E.CrowellD.PedrickL.BerndtP. (2006). TV characters at work: Television’s role in the occupational aspirations of economically disadvantaged youths. Journal of Career Development, 33, 3-18. doi:10.1177/0894845305282768
26.
HoytC. L.SimonS. (2011). Female leaders: Injurious or inspiring role models for women?Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 143-157. doi:10.1177/0361684310385216
27.
KarazsiaB. T.van DulmenM. H. M.WongK.CrowtherJ. H. (2013). Thinking meta-theoretically about the role of internalization in the development of body dissatisfaction and body change behaviors. Body Image, 10, 433-441. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2013.06.005
28.
LangloisJ. H.KalakanisL.RubensteinA. J.LarsonA.HallamM.SmootM. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 390-423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
29.
LatuI. M.MastM. S.LammersJ.BombariD. (2013). Successful female leaders empower women’s behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 444-448. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.003
30.
LevineK. J.HoffnerC. A. (2006). Adolescents’ conceptions of work: What is learned from different sources during anticipatory socialization?Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 647-669. doi:10.1177/0743558406293963
31.
LoughnanS.HaslamN.MurnaneT.VaesJ.ReynoldsC.SuitnerC. (2010). Objectification leads to depersonalization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 709-717.
32.
ManagoA. M. (2014). Identity development in a digital age: The case of social networking sites. In McLeanK. C.SyedM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of identity development (pp. 508-524). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199936564.013.031
33.
McCabeJ.FairchildE.GrauerholzL.PescosolidoB. A.TopeD. (2011). Gender in twentieth-century children’s books: Patterns of disparity in titles and central characters. Gender & Society, 25, 197-226. doi:10.1177/0891243211398358
34.
MeeusW. (2011). The study of adolescent identity formation 200-2012: A review of longitudinal research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 75-94. doi:10.1111/j.1532.2010.00716.x
35.
MillerC. C. (2014, February9). LeanIn.org and Getty aim to change women’s portrayal in stock photos. The New York Times. Available from http://www.nytimes.com
36.
NautaM. M.SaucierA. M.WoodardL. E. (2001). Interpersonal influences on students’ academic and career decisions: The impact of sexual orientation. The Career Development Quarterly, 49, 352-362.
37.
Parks-StammE. J.HeilmanM. E.HearnsK. A. (2008). Motivated to penalize: Women’s strategic rejection of successful women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 237-247. doi:10.1177/0146167207310027
RudmanL. A.PhelanJ. E. (2010). The effect of priming gender roles on women’s implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations. Social Psychology, 41, 192-202. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000027
40.
SmithS. L.ChoueitiM.PrescottA.PieperK. (2012). Gender roles & occupations: A look at character attributes and job-related aspirations in film and television. Available from http://www.thegeenadavisinstitute.org
SteinkeJ.ApplegateB.LapinskiM.RyanL.LongM. (2012). Gender differences in adolescents’ wishful identification with scientist characters on television. Science Communication, 34, 163-199. doi:10.1177/1075547011410250
43.
ThompsonJ. K.van den BergP.RoehrigM.GuardaA. S.HeinbergL. J. (2004). The Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Scale-3 (SATAQ-3): Development and validation. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 35, 293-304. doi:10.1002/eat.10257
44.
TurnerJ. C.BrownR. J.TajfelH. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in in-group favouritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187-204. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420090207
45.
TylkaT. L. (2011). Refinement of the tripartite influence model for men: Dual body image pathways to body change behaviors. Body Image, 8, 199-207. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2011.04.008
46.
WardL. M.HarrisonK. (2005). The impact of media use on girls’ beliefs about gender roles, their bodies, and sexual relationships: A research synthesis. In ColeE.DanielJ. H. (Eds.), Featuring females: Feminist analyses of media (pp. 3-23). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.MortimerJ. T. (2006). Adolescent work, vocational development, and education. Review of Educational Research, 76, 537-566. doi:10.3102/00346543076004537
48.
ZurbriggenE. L.RobertsT.-A. (2013). The sexualization of girls and girlhood: Causes, consequences, and resistance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
