American college housing is beginning to introduce gender-neutral housing, or the housing of students in the same room regardless of gender. This study provides a descriptive overview of gender-neutral housing from 148 universities and documents central areas of debate in current policy discussions. Information regarding gender-neutral housing policies and practices at each of these campuses was collected. Results suggest that gender-neutral housing is currently an uncommon occurrence as a formalized housing option for most students. However, almost half of the schools sampled are currently engaging in formal or informal policy discussion regarding the addition of gender-neutral housing. Important future questions and priorities for both college administrators and scholars are suggested.
BiebergS. (2003). A case for mixed-sex university housing policies. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 32, 3-9.
2.
BourgeoisM. J.BowenA. (2001). Self-organization of alcohol-related attitudes and beliefs in a campus housing complex: An initial investigation. Health Psychology, 20, 434-437.
3.
BozickR. (2007). Making it through the first year of college: The role of students’ economic resources, employment, and living arrangements. Sociology of Education, 80, 261-284.
4.
BrownS. L. (2004). Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality. Social Science Research, 41, 583-603.
5.
ChoY. H.SpanS. A. (2010). The effect of alcohol on sexual risk-taking among young men and women. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 779-785.
6.
CrossE. J.ZimmermanD.O’GradyM. A. (2009). Residence hall room type and alcohol use among college student living on campus. Environmental Behavior, 41, 583-603.
GoodwinP.MosherW.ChandraA. (2010). Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on cycle 6 (2002) of the national survey of family growth. Vital and Health Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_23/sr23_028.pdf
9.
GordonL. (2010, March15). Mixed-gender dorm rooms are gaining acceptance. LA Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com
10.
GrelloC. M.WelshD. P.HarperM. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43, 255-267.
11.
MarkleinM. (2004, June21). Gender-neutral comes to campus. USA Today. Retrieved from http://www.usatoday.com
12.
McGeeK.SmithS.RagoZ. (2008). Gender-neutral housing proposal. Mahwah, NJ: Ramapo College of New Jersey.
13.
MonsonR. A.MertensJ. (2011). All in the family: Red states, blue states, and postmodern family patterns, 2001 and 2004. Sociological Quarterly, 52, 244-267.
14.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Digest of Education Statistics: 2010. Washington, DC: Author.
15.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.NelsonL. J.MadsenS. D.BarryC. M. (2008). The role of perceived parental knowledge on emerging adults’ risk behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 847-859.
16.
PegueroN.HoffmanM.BeaverA. (2011). Hallet Hall gender-neutral housing proposal. Boulder: University of Colorado at Boulder.
17.
PeplauL. A. (2003). Human sexuality: How do men and women differ?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 37-40.
18.
RandolphM. E.TorresH.Gore-FeltonC.LloydB.McGarveyE. L. (2009). Alcohol use and sexual risk behavior among college students: Understanding gender and ethnic differences. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 35, 80-84.
19.
RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2006). Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment. Journal Family Psychology, 20, 553-560.
20.
RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2009). Couples’ reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 233-258.
21.
RoudsariB. S.LeahyM. M.WaltersS. T. (2009). Correlates of dating violence among male and female heavy-drinking college students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1892-1905.
SchroederC. CMableP. (1994). Residence halls and the college experience: Past and present. In SchroederC. C.MableP. (Eds.), Realizing the educational potential of residence halls (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
24.
TurleyR. N. L.WodtkeG. (2010). College residence and academic performance: Who benefits from living on campus?Education and Urban Society, 45, 506-532.
25.
UngerR. (2005). The limits of demographic categories and the politics of the 2004 presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues & Public Policy, 5, 153-163.
26.
VelezW. (1985). Finishing college: The effects of college type. Sociology of Education, 58, 191-200.
27.
WechslerH.DowdallG. W.DavenportA.CastilloS. (1995). Correlates of college student binge drinking. American Journal of Public Health, 85, 921-926.
28.
WilloughbyB. J.CarrollJ. S. (2009). The impact of living in co-ed resident halls on risk-taking among college students. Journal of American College Health, 58, 241-246.
29.
WilloughbyB. J.CarrollJ. S.MarshallW. J.CaitlinC. (2009). The decline of in loco parentis and shift to co-ed housing on college campuses. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 21-36.
30.
WinstonR. B.AnchorsS. (1993). Student development in the residential environment. In WinstonR. B.AnchorsS. & Associates (Eds.), Student housing and residential life (pp. 25-64). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
ZamboangaB. L.OlthiusJ. V.HortonN. J.McCollumE. C.LeeJ. J.ShawR. (2009). Where’s the house party? Hazardous drinking behaviors and related risk factors. Journal of Psychology, 14, 228-244.
