This study considered the impact of the SERVE Program at Ignatius University upon participating students’ expected political involvement. The SERVE Program is a community service learning program sponsored jointly by Ignatius University’s philosophy and theology departments. Through a mixed methods research design, the authors found that Ignatius University students participating in the SERVE Program demonstrated statistically significant increases in their expected political voice in comparison with peers in a control group. Qualitative interviews with SERVE participants revealed that the program increased students’ awareness of political and social issues; heightened their commitment to philanthropy; fostered their interest in pursuing socially responsible work; and strengthened their commitment to working for social change.
AngusL. (1986). Developments in ethnographic research in education: From interpretive to critical ethnography. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(1), 59-67.
2.
ArnettJ. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
3.
ArnettJ. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
AvinsA. (1998). Can unequal be more fair?Journal of Medical Ethics, 24, 401-408.
6.
BarberB. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
BarberB.HigginsR.SmithJ.BallouJ.DedrickJ.DowningK. (1997). Democratic theory and civic measurement: A report on the measuring citizenship project. Rutgers, NJ: Walt Whitman Center.
8.
BatchelderT.RootS. (1994). Effects of an undergraduate program to integrate academic learning and service: Cognitive, prosocial cognitive, and identity outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17, 341-355.
9.
BattistoniR. (1997). Service-learning and democratic citizenship. Theory Into Practice, 36, 150-156.
10.
BeaumontE.ColbyA.ErlichT.Torney-PurtaJ. (2009). Promoting political competence and engagement in college students: An empirical study. Journal of Political Science Education, 2, 249-270.
11.
BossJ. (1994). The effect of community service work on the moral development of college ethics students. Journal of Moral Education, 23, 183-198.
Boyle-BaiseM.KilbaneJ. (2000). What really happens? A look inside service-learning for multicultural teacher education. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 54-64.
14.
BoyteH. (1991). Community service and civic education. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 765-767.
15.
CamaraH. (2008). Sister earth: Ecology, creation, and the spirit. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press.
16.
Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. (2010). Youth voting trends: Presidential elections. Retrieved from http://www.civicyouth.org
ColbyA.EhrlichT.BeaumontE.StephensJ. (2003). Educating citizens: Preparing America’s undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
ColbyA.BeaumontE.EhrlichT.CorngoldJ. (2007). Educating for democracy: Preparing undergraduates for responsible political engagement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
CrabtreeB.MillerW. (1999). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In CrabtreeB.MillerW. (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 163-177). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
DamonW. (2008). The path to purpose. New York, NY: Free Press.
22.
DensonN.VogelgesangL.SaenzV. (2005). Can service learning and a college climate of service lead to increased political engagement after college?Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/heri/understanding_service_learning.html
23.
DolteL.CramerK.DietzN.GrimmR. (2006). College students helping America. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service.
24.
DynarskiS.Scott-ClaytonJ. (2008). Complexity and targeting in federal student aid: A quantitative analysis. Tax Policy and the Economy, 22, 109-150.
25.
EriksonE. (1963). Childhood & society. New York, NY: Perseus.
26.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.
27.
EylerJ.GilesD. (1999). Where’s the learning in service-learning?San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
28.
FairbanksA. (2010, January3). Gauging the dedication of teacher corp grads. New York Times, p. A10.
29.
FarrerC. (1984). Comment. Current Anthropology, 25, 273-274.
30.
FischmanW. (1999). Young community service volunteers, the origins of humane creativity annual report, 1999. Retrieved from http://www.goodworkproject.org
31.
FlanaganC.BowesJ.JonssonB.CsapoB.SheblanovaE. (1998). Ties that bind: Correlates of adolescents’ civic commitments in seven countries. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 457-475.
32.
FlanaganC.LevineP.SetterstenR. (2009). Civic engagement and the changing transition to adulthood. Retrieved from http://www.civicyouth.org
33.
FlanaganC.TuckerC. (1999). Adolescents’ explanations for political issues: Concordance with their views of self and society. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1198-1209.
34.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays by Clifford Geertz (pp. 3-30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
35.
GilesD.EylerJ. (1994). The impact of a college community service laboratory on students’ personal, social, and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17, 327-339.
36.
GreeneD.DiehmG. (1995). Educational and service outcomes of a service integration effort. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 2, 54-62.
37.
HandlerN. (2007, September30). The posteverything generation. New York Times, p. A36.
38.
HartD.YatesM.FegleyS.WilsonG. (1995). Moral commitment in inner-city adolescents. In KillenM.HartD. (Eds.), Morality in everyday life: Developmental perspectives (pp. 317-341). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
HasteH. (1983). Social and moral cognition. In HasteH.LockeD. (Eds.), Morality in the making: Action and social context (pp. 87-108). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
40.
HodgkinsonV. (1995). Key factors influencing caring, involvement and community. In SchervishP.HodgkinsonV.GatesM. (Eds.), Care and community in modern society: Passing on the tradition of service to future generations (pp. 21-50). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Housing & Urban Development. (1999). Building higher education-community development corporation partnerships. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
42.
HunterS.BrisbinR. (2000). The impact of service learning on democratic and civic values. PS: Political Science and Politics, 33, 623-626.
43.
JonesS.AbesE. (2004). Enduring influences of service learning on college students’ identity development. Journal of College Student Development, 45, 149-166.
44.
KahneJ.MiddaughE. (2009). Democracy for some: The civic opportunity gap in high school. In LevineP.YounissJ. (Eds.), Engaging young people in civic life (pp. 29-52). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
45.
KirlinM. (2002). Civic skill building. PS: Political Science and Politics, 35, 571-575.
46.
KlakT.MartinP. (2003). Do university-sponsored international cultural events help students to appreciate “difference”?International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 445-465.
47.
LevinsonM. (2007). The civic achievement gap (Circle Working Paper No. 51). Washington, DC: Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning & Engagement. Retrieved from http://www.civicyouth.org
48.
LiuA.RuizS.DeAngeloL.PryorJ. (2009). Findings from the 2008 administration of the College Senior Survey (CSS): National aggregates. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
49.
MabryJ. (1998). Pedagogical variations in service learning and student outcomes: How time, contact, and reflection matter. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 5, 32-47.
50.
MarkusG.HowardJ.KingD. (1993). Integrating community service and classroom instruction enhances learning: Results from an experiment. Education Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 15, 410-419.
51.
MaxwellJ. (1996). Qualitative research design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
MaykutP.MorehouseR. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London, UK: Routledge-Falmer.
53.
McAdamD.BrandtC. (2009). Assessing the effects of voluntary youth service: The case of Teach for America. Social Forces, 88, 945-970.
54.
MilesM.HubermanM. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
MoelyB.McFarlandM.MironD.MercerS.IlustreV. (2002). Changes in college students’ attitudes and intentions for civic involvement as a function of service-learning experiences. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 9(1), 18-26.
56.
Myers-LiptonS. (1998). Effect of a comprehensive service-learning program on college students’ civic responsibility. Teaching Sociology, 26, 243-258.
PeplauL.TylerT. (1975). Belief in a just world and political attitudes. Paper presented at the meeting of the Western Psychological Association, Sacramento, CA.
61.
PerryJ.KatulaM. (2001). Does service affect citizenship?Administration and Society, 33, 330-365.
62.
RaudenbushS.BrykA. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
RiceK.BrownJ. (1998). Transforming educational curriculum and service learning, Journal of Experiential Education, 21, 140-146.
64.
RothW.MehtaJ. (2002). The Rashomon effect: Combining positivist and interpretivist approaches in the analysis of contested events. Sociological Methods & Research, 31, 131-173.
65.
SeiderS. (2007). Catalyzing a commitment to community service in emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 22, 612-639.
66.
SeiderS. (2008). Resisting obligation: How privileged adolescents conceive of their responsibilities to others. Journal of Research in Character Education, 6(1), 3-19.
67.
SeiderS. (2009). The trouble with teaching ethics on trolley cars or train tracks. Journal of Moral Education, 38, 219-236.
68.
SeiderS.RabinowiczS.GillmorS. (IN PRESS). The impact of philosophy and theology service-learning experiences on the public service motivation of participating college students. Journal of Higher Education.
69.
ShankmanP. (1984). The thick and the thin: On the interpretive theoretical program of Clifford Geertz. Current Anthropology, 25, 261-280.
70.
SpaniermanL.NevilleH.LiaoH.HammerJ.WangY. (2008). Participation in formal and informal camps diversity experiences: Effects on students’ racial democratic beliefs. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(2), 108-125.
71.
SpostoK.KrailoM. (1987). Use of unequal allocation in survival trials. Statistics in Medicine, 6, 119-126.
72.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
73.
StuberJ. (2006). Talk of class: The discursive repertoires of White working class and upper middle class college students. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 35, 285-318.
74.
TorgersonD.CampbellM. (2000). Use of unequal randomization to aid the economic efficiency of clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 321, 759.
75.
VerbaS.SchlozmanK.BradyH. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
76.
VogelgesangL.AstinA. (2000). Comparing the effects of service-learning and community service. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 7, 25-34.
77.
WalkerT. (2002). Service as a pathway to political participation: What research tells us. Applied Developmental Science, 6, 183-188.
78.
WhittE.EdisonM.PascarellaE.TerenziniP.NoraA. (2001). Influences on student’s openness to diversity and challenge in the second and third years of college. Journal of Higher Education, 72, 172-204.
79.
YatesM.YounissJ. (1996). A developmental perspective on community service in adolescence. Social Development, 5, 85-111.
80.
YounissJ. (2009). When morality meets politics in development. Journal of Moral Education, 38(2), 129-144.
81.
YounissJ.McLellanJ.YatesM. (1997). What we know about engendering civic identity. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 620-631.
82.
YounissJ.YatesM. (1997). Community service and social responsibility in youth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
