Cellular telephones have become an increasingly prevalent feature of contemporary American life, with usage often beginning during early adolescence. With this in mind, twenty 7th graders and their mothers participated in separate qualitative interviews regarding early adolescents’ use of cell phones as well as perceived risks and benefits of such use. Analyses indicated that early adolescents and their mothers imbued cell phones with a variety of psychological meanings. These meanings included cell phones as a source of connection to family and friends, cell phones as facilitators of adolescent autonomy development, and cell phones as sources of social status.These findings are discussed in relation to psychosocial developmental tasks occurring in early adolescence.
Aoki, K., & Downes, E.J. ( 2003). An analysis of young people’s use of and attitudes toward cell phones. Telematics and Informatics, 20, 349-364.
2.
Berndt, T.J. ( 2004). Children’s friendships: Shifts over a half-century in perspectives on their development and their effects. Merrill-PalmerQuarterly , 50, 206-223.
3.
Campbell, R. ( 2006). Teenage girls and cellular phones: Discourses of independence, safety, and "rebellion." Journal of Youth Studies, 9, 195-212.
4.
Charlton, T., Panting, C., & Hannan, A. ( 2002). Mobile telephone ownership and usage among 10- and 11-year-olds: Participation and exclusion. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties , 7, 152-163.
5.
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Rose, A.J. ( 2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102-105.
6.
Collins, W.A. ( 1997). Relationships and development during adolescence: Interpersonal adaptation to individual change. Personal Relationships, 4, 1-14.
7.
Collins, W.A., & Steinberg, L. ( 2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal context. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 1003-1067). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
8.
Darling, N., Cumsille, P., & Martínez, M. (2008). Individual differences in adolescents’ beliefs about the legitimacy of parental authority and their own obligation to obey: A longitudinal investigation. Child Development, 79, 1103-1118.
9.
Duck, S. ( 2008). Silver anniversary essay: A past and a future for relationship research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 189-200.
10.
Helms, H.M., & Demo, D.H. ( 2005). Everyday hassles and family stress. In P. C. McKenry & J. Price (Eds.), Families and change: Coping with stressful events and transitions (3rd ed., pp. 355-378). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
Hollingshead, A. ( 1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript , Yale University.
12.
Horrigan, J.A. ( 2008). Mobile access to data and information. Retrieved July 16, 2009, from the Pew Internet & American Life Project website: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Mobile-Access-to-Data-and-Information.aspx
13.
Lenhart, A. ( 2009). Teens and mobile phones over the past five years. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from the Pew Internet &American Life Project website: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2009/14-Teens-and-Mobile-Phones-Data-Memo.aspx
14.
Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., & Macgill, A. ( 2008). Writing, technology, and teens. Retrieved June 12, 2009, from the Pew Internet & American Life Project website: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Writing-Technology-and-Teens.aspx
15.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. ( 2005). Teens and technology. Retrieved May 6, 2009 from the Pew Internet & American Life Project Web site: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2005/Teens-and-Technology.aspx
16.
Ling, R. ( 2000). "We will be reached": The use of mobile telephony among Norwegian youth. Information, Technology, & People, 13, 102-120.
17.
Ling, R. ( 2007). Children, youth and mobile communication. Journal of Children and Media, 1, 60-67.
18.
Ling, R. ( 2008). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19.
Ling, R., & Yttri, B. ( 2006). Control, emancipation, and status: The mobile telephone in teens’ parental and peer relationships. In R. Kraut, M. Brynin, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the Internet: Domesticating information technology (pp. 219-234). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
McElhaney, K.B., Allen, J.P., Stephenson, J.C., & Hare, A.L. ( 2009). Attachment and autonomy during adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nded., Vol. 1, pp. 358-403). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Morin, R., & Taylor, P. ( 2009). Luxury or necessity? The public makes a u-turn. Retrieved April 23, 2010, from the Pew Internet & American Life Project website: http://pewsocialtrends.org/pubs/733/luxury-necessity-recession-era-reevaluations#pew-research-jump
23.
Parker, J., & Asher, S. ( 1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction . Developmental Psychology, 29, 611-621.
24.
Prentice, D.A. ( 1987). Psychological correspondence of possessions, attitudes, and values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 993-1003.
25.
Rankin, J., Lane, D., Gibbons, F., & Gerrard, M. ( 2004). Adolescent self-consciousness: Longitudinal age changes and gender differences in two cohorts. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 14, 1-21.
26.
Richards, M., Crowe, P., Larson, R., & Swarr, A. ( 1998). Developmental patterns and gender differences in the experience of peer companionship during adolescence. Child Development, 69, 154-163.
27.
Steinberg, L. ( 2001). We know some things: Parent-adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence , 11, 1-19.
28.
Weisskirch, R.S. ( 2008). Parenting by cell phone: Parental monitoring of adolescents and family relations. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 1123-1139.
29.
Williams, S., & Williams, L. ( 2005). Space invaders: The negotiation of teenage boundaries through the mobile phone. The Sociological Review, 53, 314-331.
