Recognition of the interplay between nature and nurture is decades old in fields such as psychiatry, but other fields in the social sciences continue to be hampered by the idea that social and biological variables compete for explanatory relevance. In a recent study of the adolescent brain and risk taking, Males critiqued biologically oriented approaches as “biodeterminist” compared to environmentally friendly approaches. Here the authors suggest that the use of biological and social variables, or nature and nurture, is not only uncontroversial but also essential for understanding psychopathology, externalizing, and antisocial behaviors. Moreover, biosocial scientific inquiry has led to progressive state policy in the case of Roper v. Simmons, precisely the opposite outcome that critics of biologically friendly research often claim.
Boyer, T.W. ( 2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review . Developmental Review, 26, 291-345.
6.
Costello, E.J., Compton, S.N., Keeler, G., & Angold, A. ( 2003). Relationships between poverty and psychopathology: A natural experiment. Journal of the American Medical Association , 290, 2023-2029.
7.
Dohrenwend, B.P., Levav, I., Shrout, P.E., Schwartz, S., Naveh, G., Link, B.G., et al. (1992). Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: The causation-selection issue. Science, 255, 946-952.
8.
Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. ( 1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., Scott, E., Graham, S., et al. (2003). Juveniles’ competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents’ and adults’ capacities as trial defendants . Law and Human Behavior, 27, 333-363.
10.
Kendler, K.S., & Prescott, C.A. (2006). Genes, environment, and psychopathology: Understanding the causes of psychiatric and substance use disorders. New York: Guilford.
11.
Males, M. ( 2009). Does the adolescent brain make risk taking inevitable? A skeptical appraisal. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 3-20.
12.
Miech, R.A., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T.E., Wright, B.R.E., & Silva, P.A. ( 1999). Low socioeconomic status and mental disorders: A longitudinal study of selection and causation during young adulthood. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1096-1131.
13.
Moffitt, T.E. ( 1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.
14.
Plomin, R., & Bergeman, C.S. (1991). The nature of nurture: Genetic influence on "environmental" measures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 14, 373-427.
15.
Plomin, R., Owen, M.J., & McGuffin, P. ( 1994). The genetic basis of complex human behaviors. Science, 264, 1733-1739.
16.
Raine, A., Moffitt, T.E., Caspi, A., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Lynam, D. ( 2005). Neurocognitive impairments in boys on the life-course persistent antisocial path. Journal of Abnormal Psychology , 114, 38-49.
17.
Restak, R. ( 2001). The secret life of the brain. New York: Dana Press/Joseph Henry Press.
18.
Roper v.Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
19.
Rowe, D.C., & Rodgers, J.L. ( 1997). Poverty and behavior: Are environmental measures nature and nurture? Developmental Review, 17, 358-375.
20.
Steinberg, L. ( 2004). Risk-taking in adolescence: What changes, and why? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 51-58.
21.
Steinberg, L. ( 2007). Risk-taking in adolescence: New perspectives from brain and behavioral science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 55-59.
22.
Steinberg, L. ( 2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking . Developmental Review, 28, 78-106.
23.
Steinberg, L. ( 2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 47-73.
24.
Tsujimoto, S. ( 2008). The prefrontal cortex: Functional neural development during early childhood. The Neuroscientist, 14, 345-358.
