This study is the first to document optimistic bias among middle and high school students within the context of school violence. Findings from a survey of 1,508 students indicate that optimistic bias provides a good framework for understanding students’ perceptions of school violence, suggesting a course of action to decrease bias in order to encourage students to take self-protective measures. The study also explores the relative contributions of personal attributes and the media in the creation and preservation of optimistic biases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnett, J. (2000). Optimistic bias in adolescent and adult smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 25(4), 625-632.
2.
Brosius, H., & Engel, D. (1996). The causes of 3rd person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes media influence. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8(2), 142-162.
3.
Buis, J., & Thompson, D. (1989). Imaginary audience and personal fable: A brief review. Adolescence, 24(96), 773-781.
4.
Busselle, R., & Greenberg, B. (2000). The nature of television realism judgments: A reevaluation of their conceptualization and measurement. Mass Communication and Society, 3(2/3), 249-268.
5.
Centers for Disease Control (CDC). (2001). Youth risk behavior surveillance. Available at www.cdc.gov
6.
Chapin, J. (1999). Third-person perception and sexual risk-taking among minority “at-risk” youth. Mass Communication and Society, 2(3/4), 163-173.
7.
Chapin, J. (2000). Third-person perception and optimistic bias among urban minority at-risk youth, Communication Research, 27(1), 51-81.
8.
Chapin, J. (2001a). Not like me: Self vs. other distinctions in first-person perception. Communication Research Reports, 17(3), 320-330.
9.
Chapin, J. (2001b). Optimistic bias regarding campus violence. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6(1), 1-11.
10.
Clarke, V., Williams, T., & Arthey, S. (1997). Skin type and optimistic bias in relation to the sun protection and sun tanning behaviors of young adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 20(2), 207-222.
11.
Duck, J., & Mullin, B. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third-person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 77-93.
12.
Duck, J., Terry, D., & Hogg, M. (1995). The perceived influence of AIDS advertising: 3rd person effects in the context of positive media content. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(3), 305-325.
13.
Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38, 1025-1034.
14.
Farber, N. (1994). Perceptions of pregnancy risk: A comparison by class and race. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 64(3), 479-484.
15.
Ferguson, E. (1997). HIV/AIDS knowledge and HIV/AIDS risk perception: An indirect relationship. Work & Stress, 11(2), 103-117.
16.
Frewer, L., Howard, C., Hedderley, D., & Shepherd, R. (1998). Methodological approaches to assessing risk perceptions associated with food-related hazards. Risk Analysis, 18(1), 95-102.
17.
Greenberg, B., Tokinoya, T., Ku, L., & Li, H. (1989). Young people and their orientation to the mass media: An international study. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University.
18.
Gunther, A. (1992). Biased press or biased public? Attitudes toward media coverage of social groups. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 147-167.
19.
Gunther, A., & Mundy, P. (1993). Biased optimism and the third-person effect. Journalism Quarterly, 70(1), 58-67.
20.
Gunther, A., & Thorson, E. (1992). Perceived persuasive effects of product commercials and public service announcements: Third-person effects in new domains. Communication Research, 19(5), 574-596.
21.
Hampson, S., Andrews, J., Lee, M., Foster, L., Glasgow, R., & Lichtenstien, E. (1998). Lay understanding of synergistic risk: The case of radon and cigarette smoking. Risk Analysis, 18(3), 343-350.
22.
Hansen, W., Raynor, A., & Wolkenstein, B. (1991). Perceived personal immunity to the consequences of drinking alcohol: The relationship between behavior and perception. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 14, 205-225.
23.
Hardeman, W., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (1997). Determinants of intentions to practice safe sex among16-25year-olds. Journal of Community& Applied Social Psychology, 7(5), 345-360.
24.
Job, R., Fleming, E., & Morgan, G. (1992). The effects of age on unrealistic optimism about driving and road safety. International Journal of Psychology, 27, 627-628.
25.
Martin, A., Berenson, K., & Griffing, S. (2000). The process of leaving an abusive relationship: The role of risk assessments and decision-certainty. Journal of Family Violence, 15 (2), 109-122.
26.
Miller, C. (1991). Risk perception: An investigation of its accuracy and impact. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52(01B), 523.
27.
Moore, S., & Rosenthal, D. (1991). Adolescent invulnerability and perceptions of AIDS risk. Journal of Adolescent Research, 6(2), 164-180.
28.
Quadrel, M., Fischoff, B., & Davis, W. (1993). Adolescent (in)vulnerability. American Psychologist, 48(2), 102-116.
29.
Smith, G., Gerrard, M., & Gibbons, F. (1997). Self-esteem and the relation between risk behavior and perceptions of vulnerability to unplanned pregnancy in college women. Health Psychology, 16(2), 137-146.
30.
Weinstein, N. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-460.
31.
Weinstein, N. (1987). Unrealistic optimism about susceptibility to health problems: Conclusions from a community-wide sample. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10(5), 325-335.
32.
Weinstein, N. (1989). Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 31-50.
33.
Weinstein, N., & Lyon, J. (1999). Mindset, optimistic bias about personal risk and health-protective behavior. British Journal of Health Psychology, 4(4), 289-300.
34.
Weinstein, N., Lyon, J., Rothman, A., & Cuite, C. (2000). Changes in perceived vulnerability following natural disaster. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(3), 372-395.
