Intergenerational closure refers to parents’ knowing the parents of their adolescents’ friends. This study treated intergenerational closure—as reported by the parents of adolescent twins—as the dependent variable in a behavioral genetic analysis. The sample consisted of identical and fraternal twin pairs in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health). Models that were fit to twin covariance matrices estimated that additive genetic influences accounted for 44% of the variance in intergenerational closure and shared environmental influences for 44%. These findings provide evidence that the heritable characteristics of adolescents influence the connections between their families and their extrafamilial social networks.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arbuckle, J., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user’s guide. Chicago: Small Waters.
Bell, R. Q. (1968). Areinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. American Psychologist, 75, 81-95.
4.
Brown, B. (1990). Peer groups. In S. Feldman & G. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent. (pp. 171-196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Carbonaro, W. J. (1998). A little help from my friends’ parents: Intergenerational closure and educational outcomes. Sociology of Education, 71, 295-313.
6.
Carbonaro, W. J. (1999). Opening the debate on closure and schooling outcomes: Comment on Morgan and Sorensen. American Sociological Review, 64, 682-686.
7.
Caspi, A., Elder, G. H., & Bem, D. J. (1988). Moving away from the world: Life-course patterns of shy children. Developmental Psychology, 24, 824-831.
8.
Cleveland, H. H., & Wiebe, R. (2003). The moderation of adolescent to peer similarity in tobacco and alcohol use. Child Development, 74, 279-291.
9.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital and the creation of humancapital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 596-620.
10.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Cox, M., & Paley, B. (1997). Families as systems. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 243-267.
12.
Crosnoe, R. (2000). Friendships in childhood and adolescence: The life course and new directions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 377-391.
13.
Furstenberg, F. F., & Hughes, E. M. (1993). Social capital and successful development among atrisk youth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 580-592.
14.
Ge, X., Conger, R. D., Cadoret, R. J., Neiderhiser, J. M., Yates, W., Troughton, E., et al. (1996). The developmental interface between nature and nurture: A mutual influence model of child antisocial behavior and parent behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32, 574-589.
15.
Granovetter, M. S. (1982). Alienation reconsidered: The strength ofweak ties. Connections, 5, 4-16.
16.
Hallinan, M. T., & Kubitschek, W. N. (1999). Conceptualizing and measuring school social networks: Comment on Morgan and Sorensen. American Sociological Review, 64, 687-693.
17.
Hetherington, E. M. (1998). Social capital and the development of youth from nondivorced, divorced and remarried families. In W. A. Collins & B. Laursen (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts: The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 177-209). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Kandel, D. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427-436.
19.
Loelin, J. C., & Nichols, R. C. (1976). Heredity, environment, and personality. Austin: University of Texas Press.
20.
Lytton, H. (1977). Do parents create, or respond to, differences in twins? Developmental Psychology, 13, 456-459.
21.
Maccoby, E. E. (1992). Family structure and children’s adjustment: Is quality of parenting the major mediator? In E. M. Hetherington & W. G. Clingempeel (Eds.), Coping with marital transitions: Monograph of the Society for Research on Child Development (pp. 230-288). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
Manke, B., McGuire, S., Reiss, D., Hetherington, E. M., & Plomin, R. (1995). Social Development, 4, 238-256.
23.
Matsueda, R., & Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36, 269-398.
24.
Morgan, S. L., & Sorensen, A. B. (1999). Parental networks, social closure, and mathematics learning: A test of Coleman’s social capital explanation of school effects. American Sociological Review, 64, 661-681.
Nollen, P. (1980). Cross-gender effect in two-child families. Developmental Psychology, 16, 159-160.
27.
O’Conner, T. G., Deater-Deckard, K., Fulker, D., Rutter, M., & Plomin, R. (1998). Genotypeenvironment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: Antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting. Developmental Psychology, 34, 970-981.
28.
Parke, R., & Bhavnagri, N. P. (1989). Parents as managers of children’s peer relationships. In D. Belle (Ed.), Children’s social networks and social supports (pp. 241-259). New York: John Wiley.
29.
Parke, R. D. (1981). Fathers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Patterson, G. R. (1986). Performance models for antisocial boys. American Psychologist, 41, 432-444.
31.
Plomin, R., Defries, J. C., McClearn, G. E., & Rutter, M. (1997). Behavioral genetics (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.
32.
Plomin, R., McClearn, G. E., Pedersen, N. L., Nesselroade, J. R., & Bergman, C. S. (1989). Genetic influences on adults’ ratings of their current family environments. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 791-803.
33.
Plomin, R., Reiss, R., Hetherington, E. M., & Howe, G. (1994). Nature and nurture: Genetic contributions to measures of the family environment. Developmental Psychology, 30, 32-43.
34.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
35.
Reiss, D. (1995). Genetic influence of family systems: Implications for development. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 543-560.
36.
Reiss, D., Neiderhiser, J. M., Hetherington, E. M., & Plomin, R. (2000). The relationship code: Deciphering genetic and social influences on adolescent development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Rowe, D. C. (1981). Environmental and genetic influences on dimensions of perceived parenting: A twin study. Developmental Psychology, 17, 203-208.
38.
Rowe, D. C. (1983). A biometric analysis of perceptions of family environment: A study of twin and singleton sibling kinships. Child Development, 54, 416-223.
39.
Rubin, K., Bukowski, W., & Parker, J. (1998). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R. M. Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 619-700). New York: John Wiley.
40.
Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Earls, F. (1999). Beyond social capital: Spatial dynamics of collective efficacy for children. American Sociological Review, 64, 633-660.
41.
Savin-Williams, R., & Berndt, T. (1990). Friendships and peer relations. In S. Feldman & G. Elliot (Eds.), At the threshold. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). Howpeople make their own environments: Atheory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424-435.
43.
Tellegen, A., Lykken, D. T., Bouchard, T. J., Wilcox, K., Segal, N., & Rich, A. (1988). Personality similarity in twins reared together and apart. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1031-1039.
44.
van den Boom, D. C. (1991). The influence of infant irritability on the development of the mother-infant relationship in the first 6 months of life. In J. K. Nugent, B. M. Lester, & T. B. Brazelton (Eds.), The cultural context of infancy: Vol. 2. Multicultural and interdisciplinary approaches to parent-infant relations (pp. 63-93). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45.
Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Knopf.
