In this article, the Kerpelman, Pittnan, and Lamke (1997) microprocess perspective on identity development is discussed. Comments focus on the role of individual differences and cultural and historical contexts in the model, and questions are raised about the ways in which the model conceptualizes and handles developmental shifts in identity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berzonsky, M. D.
(1990). Self-construction over the life span: A process perspective on identity formation. In G. J. Neimeyer & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Advances in personal construct psychology (Vol 1., pp. 155-186). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
Bosma, H. A.
, Graafsma, T.L.G., Grotevant, H. D., & deLevita, D. J. (1994). Identity and development: An interdisciplinary approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
Csikszentmihalyi, M.
& Larson, R. (1987). The experience sampling method. Journal ofNervous and Mental Disease, 175, 526-536.
4.
Fiese, B. H., Dickstein, S., Fravel, D. L., Grotevant, H. D., Sameroff, A. J., & Wamboldt, F (1995). Family story collaborative project codebook. Unpublished manuscript, Syracuse University.
5.
Grotevant, H. D.
(1987). Toward a process model of identity formation. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 203-222.
6.
Grotevant, H. D.
(1992). Assigned and chosen identity components: A process perspective on their integration. In G. R. Adams, R. Montemayor, & T. Gulotta (Eds.), Advances in adolescent development (Vol. 4, pp. 73-90). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Grotevant, H. D.
(1993). The integrative nature of identity: Bringing the soloists to sing in the choir. In J. Kroger (Ed.), Discussions on ego identity. (pp. 121-146) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Grotevant, H. D.
& Cooper, C. R. (in press). Individuality and connectedness in adolescent development: Review and prospects for research on identity, relationships, and context. In E. Skoe & A. von derLippe (Eds.), Personality development in adolescence: A cross national and life span perspecdve. London: Routledge.
9.
Kegan, R.
(1982). The evolving self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Kerpelman, J.
, Pitunan, J. F., & Lamke, L. M. (1997). Toward a microprocess perspective on adolescentidentity development: An identity control theory approach. Journal ofAdolescent Research, 12(3), 325-346.
11.
Larson, R.
, & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. In H. T. Reis (Ed.), Naturalistic approaches to studying social interaction. New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science. (No. 15., pp. 41-56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Larson, R.
, & Richards, M. H. (1994). Divergent realities: The emotional lives of mothers, fathers, and adolescents. New York: Basic.
13.
Loevinger, J.
(1976). Ego development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14.
Marcia, J. E.
(1993) The status of the statuses: Research review. In J. E. Marcia, A. S. Waterman, D. R. Matteson, S. L. Archer, & J. L. Orlofsky, (Eds.), Ego identity: A handbook for psychosocial research. (pp. 22-41). New York: Springer-Verlag.
15.
McAdams, D. P.
(1988). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. New York: Guilford.
16.
Polkinghorne, D. E.
(1991). Narrative and self-concept. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1(2/3), 135-153.
17.
Selman, R.
(1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.
18.
Swann, W. B.
(1987). Identity negotiation: Where two roads meet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1038-1051.
19.
Swann, W. B.
, &Hill, C. A. (1982). Whenouridentities are mistaken: Reaffirmingself-conceptions through social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 59-66.
