The Kerpelman, Pittman, and La,nke (1997) control model provides an excellent illustration of the potential contribution that research on social-cognitive processes can make to the literature on identity development. Their microprocess analysis offers a novel perspective within which research on identity formation can be conceptualized and conducted. I argue that a credible explanation of the development of autonomous self-regulated behavior needs to consider differences in the process by which identity standards are internalized and evaluated, and individual differences in how those standards are conserved and/or revised. Research on cognitive dissonance, identity style, and self-determined action is used to support this individual differences analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berzonsky, M. D.
(1988). Self-theorists, identity status, and social cognition. In D. K. Lapsley & F. C. Power (Eds.), Self ego, and identity: Integrative approaches (pp. 243-262). New York: Springer-Verlag.
2.
Berzonsky, M. D.
(1990). Self-construction over the life-span: Aprocess perspective on identity formation. In G. J. Neimeyer & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Advances in personal construct psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 155-186). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
3.
Berzonsky, M. D.
(1993). Aconstructivist view of identity development: People as postpositivist self-theorists. In J. Kroger (Ed.), Discussions on ego identity (pp. 169-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Berzonsky, M. D.
(1994, July). A diffuse/avoidant identity processing style: Confused self or self-serving strategy? Paper presented at the Biennial Meetings of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5.
Berzonsky, M. D.
(1995). Public self-presentations and self-conceptions: The moderating role of identity status. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 737-745.
6.
Berzonsky, M. D.
, & Kinney, A. (1995, February). Identity style and needfor cognitive closure. Paper presented at the conference of the Society for Research in Identity Formation, Dog Island, FL.
7.
Berzonsky, M. D.
, & Sullivan, C. (1992). Social-cognitive aspects of identity style: Need for cognition, experiential openness, and introspection. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 140-155.
8.
Carver, C. S.
, & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
9.
Cooper, J.
, & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229-266). New York: Academic Press.
10.
Deci, E. L.
, Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119-142.
11.
Deci, E. L.
, & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
12.
Epstein, S.
(1973). The self-concept revisited: Or a theory of a theory. American Psychologist, 28,404-416.
13.
Fazio, R. H.
, Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1977). Dissonance and self-perception: An integrative view of each theory's proper domain of application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 464-479.
14.
Festinger, L.
(1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
15.
Grotevant, H. D.
(1987). Toward a process model of identity. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 203-222.
16.
Hass, R. G.
, & Mann, R. W. (1976). Anticipatory belief change: Persuasion or impression management?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 105-111.
17.
Hovland, C. I.
, Harvey, O. J., & Sherif, M. (1957). Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. Journal of Abnonral and Social Psychology, 55, 244-252.
18.
Jones, E. E.
, Rhodewalt, F., Berglas, S., & Skelton, J. A. (1981). Effects of strategic self-presentation on subsequent self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 407-421.
19.
Kerpelman, J.
, Pittman, J. F., & Lamke, L. M. (1997). Toward a microprocess perspective on adolescent identity development: An identity control theory approach. Journal ofAdolescent Research, 12(3), 325-346.
20.
Marcia, J. E.
(1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551-558.
21.
Markus, H.
(1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
22.
Powers, W. T.
(1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.
23.
Rhodewalt, F.
, & Agustsdottir, S. (1986). Effects of self-presentation on the phenomenal self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 47-55.
24.
Schlenker, B. R.
, & Trudeau, J. V. (1990). Impact of self-presentations on private self-beliefs: Effects of prior self-beliefs and misattribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 22-32.
25.
Steele, C. M.
, & Liu, T. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 5-19.
26.
Tedeschi, J. T.
, Schlenker, B. R., & Bonoma, T. V. (1971). Cognitive dissonance: Private ratiocination or public spectacle?American Psychologist, 26, 685-695.
27.
Whitboume, S. K.
, & Weinstock, C. S. (1979). Adult development: The differentiation of experience. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
28.
Wicklund, R. A.
, & Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
