Differences among four types of decisions (abortion, medical, future oriented, and interpersonal) were explored by presenting vignettes to 169 adolescents 18 through 20 years of age. Participants ranked potential consultants including specif ic family members, significant others, friends, and various professionals on eight decisions. Analyses of the frequency and order of consultation of each consultee 's advice were performedfor all decisions. Consultation patterns for each type of decision differed, thus indicating that the choice of consultants was a function of the type of decision. These findings indicate that for late adolescents, different consultants were seen as useful for making abortion decisions when compared to making medical, future oriented, or interpersonal decisions. Given that the consultation patterns for these decisions were unique, research on decision making should address the role of context and avoid assumptions of generalizability. Details of the frequency and order of consultation for each type of decision are provided
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alan Guttmacher Institute
. (1993). Facts in brief: Teenage sexual and reproductive behavior. New York: Author.
2.
Ashton, J. R.
(1980). Patterns of discussion and decision-making amongst abortion patients. Journal of Biosocial Science, 12, 247-259.
3.
Bachrach, C. A.
, Stolley, K. S., & London, K. A. (1992). Relinquishment of premarital births: Evidence from national survey data. Family Planning Perspectives, 24, 27-32.
4.
Biddle, B. J.
, Bank, B. J., & Marlin, M. M. (1980). Parental and peer influence on adolescents. Social Forces, 58, 1057-1079.
5.
Blyth, D. A.
, Hill, J. P., & Smith-Thiel, K. (1982). Early adolescents' significant others: Grade and gender differences in perceived relationships with familial and nonfamilial adults and young people. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 425-450.
6.
Bracken, M.
, Klerman, L., & Bracken, M. (1978). Coping with pregnancy resolution among never-married women. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 48320-333.
7.
Center for Reproductive Law and Policy
. (July 1993). Reproductive freedom in the states: The status of women's reproductive freedom. New York: Author.
8.
Cicirelli, V. G.
(1980). A comparison of college women's feelings toward their siblings and parents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 111-118.
9.
Clark, R. A.
(1993). Men's and women's self-confidence in persuasive, comforting, and justificatory communication tasks. Sex Roles, 28, 553-567.
10.
Emmerich, H. J.
(1978). The influence of parents and peers on choices made by adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7, 175-180.
11.
Farber, N. B.
(1991). The process of pregnancy resolution among adolescent mothers. Adolescence, 26, 697-716.
12.
Feeney, J. A.
, Noller, P., & Patty, J. (1993). Adolescents' interactions with the opposite sex: Influence of attachment style and gender. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 169-186.
Furby, L.
, & Beyth-Marom, R. (1990). Risk taking in adolescence: A decision-making perspective. (Working paper). Washington, DC: Camegie Council on Adolescent Development.
15.
Gardner, W.
, Scherer, D., & Tester, M. (1989). Asserting scientific authority: Cognitive development and adolescent legal rights. American Psychologist, 44, 895-902.
16.
Gigerenzer, G.
(1992, November). Where do we go from here? After heuristics and biases. A paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Judgment and Decision Making, St. Louis, MO.
17.
Henshaw, S. K.
(1993). Teenage abortion, birth and pregnancy statistics by state, 1988. Family Planning Perspectives, 25, 122-126.
18.
Henshaw, S. K.
& Kost, K. (1992). Parental involvement in minors' abortion decisions. Family Planning Perspectives, 24, 196-207, 213-213.
19.
Jones, J. B.
, & Philliber, S. G. (1983). Sexually active but not pregnant: A comparison of teens who risk and teens who plan. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 235-251.
20.
Lewis, C.
(1980). A comparison of minors' and adults' pregnancy decisions. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 50, 446-453.
21.
Limber, S. P. (1992). Parental notification in cases of adolescent abortion: Parental consultation and the effects ofparental influence upon adolescents 'pregnancy decisions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
22.
Major, B.
, & Cozzarelli, C. (1992). Psychosocial predictors of adjustment to abortion. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 121-142.
23.
Major, B.
, Cozzarelli, C., Sciacchitano, A. M., Cooper, M. L., Testa, M., & Mueller, P. M. (1990). Perceived social support, self-efficacy, and adjustment to abortion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 452-463.
24.
Major, B.
, Cozzarelli, C., Testa, M., & Mueller, P. (1992). Male partners' appraisals of undesired pregnancy and abortion: Implications for women's adjustment to abortion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 599-614.
25.
Markman, H. J.
, Silvem, L., Clements, M., & Kraft-Hanak, S. (1993). Men and women dealing with conflict in heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 107-125.
26.
Melton, G. B.
(1983). Children's competence to consent. In G. B. Melton, G. P. Koocher, & M. J. Saks (Eds.), Children's competence to consent (pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum.
27.
Melton, G. B.
, & Russo, N. F. (1987). Adolescent abortion: Psychological perspectives on public policy. American Psychologist, 42, 69-72.
28.
Moore, K. A.
, & Snyder, N. O. (1994). Facts ata glance. Washington, DC: Child Trends, Inc.
29.
Noller, P.
& Callan, V. J. (1990). Adolescents perceptions of the nature of their communication with parents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 349-362.
30.
Ortiz, C. G.
, & Nuttall, E. V. (1987). Adolescent pregnancy: Effects of family support, education, and religion on the decision to carry or terminate among Puerto Rican teenagers. Adolescence, 22, p. 898-917.
31.
Rosen, R. H.
(1980). Adolescent pregnancy decision-making: Are parents important?Adolescence, 15, 43-54.
32.
Rosenwasser, S. M.
, Wright, L. S., & Barber, R. B. (1987). The rights and responsibilities of men in abortion situations. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 97-105.
33.
Ross, L.
, & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
Ryan, I. J.
, & Dunn, P. C. (1983). College students' attitudes toward shared responsibility in decisions about abortion: Implications for counseling. Journal of American College Health, 31, 231-235.
35.
Scherer, D.
, & Reppucci, N. D. (1988). Adolescents' capacities to provide voluntary informed consent: The effects of parental influence and medical dilemmas. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 123-142.
36.
Siegel, S.
(1956). Nonparametric statisticsfor behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
Urberg, K. A.
, & Rosen, R. A. (1987). Age differences in adolescent decision-making. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2, 447-454.
38.
Waterman, A. S.
(1985). Identity in the context of adolescent psychology. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), New Directions for Child Development (No. 30, pp. 5-24). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39.
Wilks, J.
(1986). The relative importance of parents and friends in adolescent decision making. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15, 323-334.
40.
Wintre, M. G.
, Hicks, R., McVey, G., & Fox, J. (1988). Age and sex differences in choice of consultant for various types of problems. Child Development, 59, 1046-1055.
41.
Young, A. T.
, Berkman, B., & Rehr, H. (1975). Parental influence on pregnant adolescents. Social Work, 20, 387-391.
42.
Zakus, G.
, & Wilday, S. (1987). Adolescent abortion option. Social Work in Health Care, 12, 77-91.
