Millions of ournation 's youth are at riskfor involvement in crime and violence, substance use and abuse, unsafe sex, school failure, lack of job preparedness, and the problems associated with living in poverty. To address these issues, scholars and child advocates have called for comprehensive, integrated, and community-based responses that build community capacities for sustaining effective programs. Based on a model for university-community collaboration in the evaluation of youth-serving programs, the Development-In-Context Evaluation (DICE) model, a means is presented to promote such community empowerment. Building on the work of Weiss and her colleagues, the DICE model involves a community-collaborative approach to evaluation, and to program design and implementation. The approach builds on the values of the community, engages community members in issues identification, in evaluation design, implementation, data collection, and in decisions about how to use the results of the evaluation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baltes, P. B.
, & Baltes, M. M. (1980). Plasticity and variability in psychological aging: Methodological and theoretical issues. In G. E. Gurski (Ed.), Determining the effects of aging on the central nervous system (pp. 41-66). Berlin: Schering.
2.
Bronfenbrenner, U.
(1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Camegie Corporation of New York
. (1992). A matter of time: Risk and opportunity in the nonschool hours. Available from Camegie Council on Adolescent Development, P.O. Box 753, Waldorf, MD 20604.
4.
Carnegie Corporation of New York
. (1994, April). Starting points: Meeting the needs of our youngest children. Available from Carnegie Corporation of New York, P.O. Box 753, Waldorf, MD 20604.
5.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development
. (1989, June). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. Available from Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, 11 Dupont Circle, N.W., Washington, DC 20036.
6.
Center for the Study of Social Policy
. (1994). 1994 KIDS COUNT data book: State profiles of child well-being. Available from the Center for the Study of Social Policy, Suite 503, 1250 Eye Street, N.W., Washington DC, 20005.
7.
Clarke, A. M.
, & Clarke, A.D.B. (Eds.). (1976). Early experience: Myth and evidence. New York: Free Press.
8.
Cronbach, L.
, and Associates. (1980). Toward reform of program evalutation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Dixon, R. A.
, & Lerner, R. M. (1992). A history of systems in developmental psychology. In M. H. Bomstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (3rd ed., pp. 3-58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Dryfoos, J. G.
(1990). Adolescents at risk: Prevalence and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Dryfoos, J. G.
(1994). Full service schools: A revolution in health and social services of children, youth andfamilies. San Fransico: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Dryfoos, J. G.
(1995). Foreword. In R. M. Lemer (Ed.), America's children and adolescents in crisis: Challenges and options for programs and policies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Edelman, M. W.
(1993). Leave no child behind: Mobilizing families and communities for America's children. Washington, DC: Children's Defense Fund.
14.
Elder, G. H., Jr.
(1980). Adolescence in historical perspective. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbooks of adolescent psychology (pp. 3-46). New York: Wiley.
15.
Ford, D. L.
, & Lemer, R. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Hamburg, D. A.
(1992). Today's children: Creating afuturefora generation in crisis. New York: Time Books.
17.
Hebb, D. O.
(1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
18.
Huston, A. C.
(1991). Children in poverty: Developmental and policy issues. In A. C. Huston (Ed.), Children in poverty: Child development and public policy (pp. 1-22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Jacobs, F. H.
(1988). The five-tiered approach to evaluation: Context and implementation. In H. Weiss & F. Jacobs (Eds.), Evaluating family programs (pp. 37-68). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
20.
Kahn, R. L.
, & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles, and social support. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 253-286). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Kretzmann, J. P.
, & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Bulding communities from the inside out: A path towardfinding and mobilizing a community's assets. Available from Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University, 2040 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208.
22.
Lerner, R. M.
(1982). Children and adolescents as producers of their own development. Developmental Review, 2, 342-370.
23.
Lmemer, R. M.
(1984). On the nature of human plasticity. New York: Cambridge University.
24.
Lemer, R. M.
(1986). Concepts and theories of human development (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
25.
Lerner, R. M.
(1991). Changing organism-context relations as the basic process of development: A developmental contextual perspective. Developmental Psychology, 27, 27-32.
26.
Lemer, R. M.
(1992). Dialectics, developmental contextualism, and the further enhancement of theory about puberty and psychosocial development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 12, 366-388.
27.
Lerner, R. M.
(1995). America's youth in crisis: Challenges and options for programs and policies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Lerner, R. M.
(in press). Diversity and context in research, policy, and programs for children and adolescence: A developmental contextual perspective. In G. K. Brookins & M. B. Spencer (Eds.), Ethnicity and diversity: Implications for research policies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
Lemer, R. M.
, & Busch-Rossnagel, N. (1981). Individuals as producers of their development: Conceptual and empirical bases. In R. M. Lemer & N. A. Busch-Rossnagel (Eds.), Individuals as producers of their development: A life-span perspective (pp. 1-36). New York: Academic Press.
30.
Lerner, R. M.
, & Miller, J. R. (1993). Integrating human development research and intervention for America's children: The Michigan State University model. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14, 347-364.
31.
Lerner, R. M.
, Miller, J. R., Knott, J. H., Corey, K. E., Bynum, T. S., Hoopfer, L. C., McKinney, M. H., Abrams, L. A., Hula, R. C., & Terry, P. A. (1994). Integrating scholarship and outreach in human development research, policy, and service: A developmental contextual perspective. In D. L. Featherman, R. M. Lemer, & M. Perlmutter (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior, 12 (pp. 249-273). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
Lerner, R. M.
, Ostrom, C. W., Miller, J. R., Votruba, J. C., von Eye, A., Cox-Hoopfer, L., Terry, P. A., Taylor, C. S., Villarruel, F. A., & McKinney, M. H. (in press). Training applied developmental scientists for community outreach: The Michigan State University model of integrating science and outreach for children, youth, and families. In C. B. Fisher, J. P. Murray, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Applied developmental science: Graduate training for diverse disciplines and educational settings. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33.
Lemer, R. M.
, & Ryff, C. D. (1978). Implementation of the life-span view of human development: The sample case of attachment. In P. B. Baltes (Ed.), Life-span development and behavior, 1 (pp. 1-44). New York: Academic Press.
34.
Little, R. R.
(1993, March). What's working for today's youth: The issues, the programs, and the learnings. Paper presented at an ICYF Fellows Colloquium, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
35.
MacDonald, M.
(1994). Reinventing systems: Collaborations to supportfamilies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
36.
McKinney, M.
, Abrams, L. A., Terry, P. A., & Lemer, R. M. (1994). Child development research and the poor children of America: A call for a developmental contextual approach to research and outreach. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23, 26-42.
37.
McKnight, J. L.
, & Kretzmann, J. P. (1993). Mapping community capacity. Michigan State University Community and Economic Development Program Community News, pp. 1-4.
38.
McLoyd, V. C.
(1994). Research in the service of poor and ethnic/racial minority children: A moral imperative. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23, 56-66.
39.
Miller, P. B.
(1993). Building villages to raise our children: Evaluation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
40.
Mincy, R. B.
(Ed.). (1994). Nurturing young Black males: Challenges to agencies, programs, and social policy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
41.
National Research Council
. (1993). Losing generations: Adolescents in high-risk settings. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
Peirce, C. S.
(1931). In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. Burks (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5, p. 86-86). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
Pittman, K. J.
, & Zeldin, S. (1994). From deterence to development: Shifting the focus of youth programs for African-American males. In R. B. Mincy (Ed.), Nurturing young Black males: Challenges to agencies, programs, and social policy (pp. 45-55). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
44.
Schneirla, T. C.
(1957). The concept of development in comparative psychology. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development (pp. 78-108). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
45.
Schorr, L. B.
(1988). Within our reach: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage. New York: Doubleday.
46.
Tobach, E.
(1981). Evolutionary aspects of the activity of the organism and its development. In R. M. Lerner & N. A. Busch-Rossnagel (Eds.), Individuals as producers of their own development: A life-span perspective (pp. 37-68). New York: Academic Press.
47.
Tobach, E.
, & Greenberg, G. (1984). The significance of T. C. Schneirla's contribution to the concept of levels of integration. In G. Greenberg & E. Tobach (Eds.), Behavioral evolution and integrative levels (pp. 1-7). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
Weiss, H. B.
(1987a). Family support and education in early childhood programs. In S. Kagan, D. Powell, B. Weissbourd, & E. Zigler (Eds.), America's family support programs (pp. 133-160). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
49.
Weiss, H. B.
(1987b). Evaluating social programs: What have we learned. Society, 25(1), 40-45.
50.
Weiss, H. B.
, & Greene, J. C. (1992). An empowerment partnership for family support and education programs and evaluations. Family Science Review, 5 (1 & 2), 131-149.
51.
Weiss, H. B.
, & Hite, S. (1986). Evaluation: Who's doing it and how? A report from a national program survey conducted by the Harvard Family Research Council. Family Resource Coalition Report, 3, 4-7.
52.
Weiss, H. B.
, & Jacobs, F. (Eds.). (1988). Evaluatingfamily programs. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
