There is limited research that addresses the importance offamily factors in the development of principled moral reasoning. To determine whether a relationship indeed existed between family adaptability and cohesion and principled moral reasoning, a sample of 131 middle adolescents was measured on moral reasoning level (using the Defining Issues Test) and levels of perceived family adaptability and cohesion (using Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales). No significant relationships were found between adaptability and the use of principled moral reasoning; however, family cohesion did correlate (but only with males) with percentages of principled moral reasoning. Satisfaction with levels offamily cohesion andfamily adaptability also was significantly related to moral development in males. In addition, there were interaction effects of cohesion and adaptability, suggesting that moderate levels of cohesion, in combination with either high or low levels of adaptability, were related to higher levels of principled moral reasoning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, S.
, & Gavazzi, S. (1990). A test of the Olson Circumplex Model: Examining its curvilinear assumption and the presence of extreme types. Family Process, 29, 309-324.
2.
Baumrind, D.
(1978). Parental disciplinary patterns and social competence in children. Youth and Society, 9, 239-276.
3.
Colby, A.
, Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J., & Lieberman, M. (1983). A longitudinal study of moral development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (No. 203). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Demo, D. H.
, Small, S. A., & Savin-Williams, R. C. (1987). Family relations and the self-esteem of adolescents and their parents. Journal of Mariage and the Family, 49, 705-715.
5.
Dunton, K. J.
(1989). Parental practices associated with their children's moral reasoning development. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 3306A-3306A.
6.
Farrel, M.
, & Barnes, H. (1993). Family systems and social support: A test of the effects of cohesion and adaptability on the functioning of adolescents. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 119-132.
7.
Gecas, V.
, & Schwalbe, M. L. (1986). Parental behavior and adolescent self-esteem. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 37-46.
8.
Grotevant, H.
, & Cooper, C. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence. Child Development, 56, 415-428.
9.
Grotevant, H.
, & Cooper, C. (1986). Individuation in family relationships: A perspective on individual differences in the development of identity and role taking skill in adolescence. Human Development, 29, 82-100.
10.
Haan, N.
, Smith, M., & Block, J. (1968). Moral reasoning of young adults: Political-social behavior, family background, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 183-201.
11.
Hart, D.
(1988). Alongitudinal study of adolescents' socialization and identification as predictors of adult moral judgement development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 245-260.
12.
Holstein, C. B.
(1972). The relation of children's moral judgement level to that of their parents and to communication patterns in the family. In R. C. Smart & M. S. Smart (Eds.), Readings in child development and relationships. New York: Macmillan.
13.
Jackson, E.
, Dunham, R., & Kidwell, J. (1990). The effects of gender and of family cohesion and adaptability on identity status. Journal of Adolescent Research, 5, 161-174.
14.
Jurkovic, G. J.
, & Prentice, N. M. (1974). Dimensions of moral interaction and moral judgement in delinquent and nondelinquent families. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 256-262.
15.
Kenny, M.
(1990). College seniors' perceptions of parental attachments: The value and stability of family ties. Journal of Student development, 31, 39-46.
16.
Kohlberg, L.
(1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347-480). Chicago: Rand McNally.
17.
Kohlberg, L.
(1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior (pp. 31-53). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
18.
Minuchin, S.
(1974). Families andfamily therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19.
Noller, P.
, & Callan, V. (1991). The adolescent in the famitly. New York: Routledge, Chapman, & Hall.
20.
Olson, D. H.
(1986). Circumplex Model VII: Validation studies and FACES III. Family Process, 25, 337-351.
21.
Olson, D. H.
(1989). Circumplex model of family systems VIII: Family assessment and intervention. In D. H. Olson, C. S. Russell, & D. H. Sprenkle (Eds.), Circumplex model: Systemic assessment and treatment offamilies (pp. 7-49). New York: Haworth.
22.
Olson, D. H.
, Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxen, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Families: What makes them work. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Olson, D. H.
, McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxen, M., & Wilson, M. (1985). Family inventories. St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press.
24.
Olson, D.
, Russell, C.S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1980). Marital and family therapy: Adecade review. Joumal of Marriage and the Family, 22, 69-83.
25.
Olson, D.
, Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex model of marital and family systems VI: Theoretical update. Family Process, 22, 69-83.
26.
Parikh, B.
(1980). Development of moral judgment and its relation to family environmental factors in American and Indian children. Child Development, 51, 1030-1039.
27.
Perosa, L.
, & Perosa, S. (1990). The use of a bipolar item format for FACES III: A reconsideration. Joumal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 187-199.
28.
Powers, S. I.
(1988). Moral judgment development within the family. Journal of Moral Education, 17, 209-219.
29.
Preto, N. G.
(1989). Transformation of the family system in adolescence. In B. Carter & M. McGoldrick (Eds.), The changing family life cycle. (pp. 255-283). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
Reimer, J.
, Paolito, D. P., & Hersch, R. H. (1983). Promoting moral growth, from Piaget to Kohlberg. New York: Longman.
31.
Rest, J. R.
(1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
Rest, J. R.
, Davison, M. L., & Robbins, S. (1978). Age trends in judging moral issues: A review of cross-sectional, longitudinal, and sequential studies of the Defining Issues Test. Child Development, 49, 263-279.
33.
Romig, C.
, & Bakken, L. (1992). Intimacy development in middle adolescents: Its relationship to gender and family cohesion and adaptability. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 325-338.
34.
Santrock, J. W.
(1987). Adolescence: An introduction (3rd ed.) (pp. 204-259). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
35.
Speicher-Dubin, B. (1981). Relationships between parent moraljudgment, child moraljudgment and family interaction: A correlational study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
36.
Steinberg, L.
(1989). Adolescence (pp. 271-300). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
37.
Walker, L. J.
, de Vries, B., & Trevethan, S. D. (1987). Moral stages and moral orientations in real-life and hypothetical dilemmas. Child Development, 58, 842-858.
38.
Walker, L. J.
, & Taylor, J. H. (1991). Family interactions and the development of moral reasoning. Child Development, 62, 264-283.
39.
Wesdley, W. A.
, & Epstein, N. B. (1969). Silent minority: Families of emotionally healthy college students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
