Abstract
Differences between older and younger adolescents on variables theoretically related to the decision-making process were studied in the context of a naturally occurring problem requiring a decision; the resolution of a problem pregnancy. The starting point of the study was a consideration of decision-making theory in a developmental context. Older adolescents compared to younger adolescents were hypothesized to: (a) generate more alternatives for consideration, (b) consider more consequences of each alternative, (c) mention more negative consequences of the alternatives considered, (d) mention more future consequences of the alternatives, and (e) be more apt to have a contingency plan. The data were gathered on 100 pregnant teenagers (45% under 17 years of age, 55% 18 and 19 years of age) in a rural midwestern county. The results indicated that older adolescents were more likely to have contingency plans and were more likely to consider the long term consequences of their actions. There were no differences in number of alternatives or consequences considered or in the consideration of both positive and negative consequences. The possible effect of the particular decision being made is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
