This paper analyzes contemporary conceptual approaches to the investigation of adolescent development in the family. As a way of clarifying the current conceptual disarray in the field, a framework developed by philosopher Stephen Pepper is presented of four fundamental metaphors that have formed the basis for scientific investigation. Research on adolescent development in the family exemplifying each metaphor is used to illustrate its distinctive contributions and limitations. Possibilities for reconciliation among the metaphors are then considered. Investigators are encouraged to see the implications of their choices in the context of this wider conceptual perspective.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnes, H. L.
, & Olson, D. H. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the Circumplex model. Child Development, 56, 438-447.
2.
Beavers, W R.
(1983). Family models: Comparing and contrasting the Olson Circumplex model with the Beavers Systems model. Family Process, 22, 85-98.
3.
Bronfenbrenner, U.
, & Crouter, A. (1983). The evolution of environmental models in developmental research. In W Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. I. History, theory, and methods (pp. 397-414). New York: Wiley.
4.
Cooper, C. R.
, & Ayers-Lopez, S. (1985). Family and peer systems in early adolescence: New models of the role of relationships in development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 5, 9-21.
5.
Cooper, C. R.
(in press). Commentary: The role of conflict in adolescent-parent relationships. In M. Gunnar (Ed.), Development during the transition to adolescence, the Minnesota symposium on child psychology.
6.
Goffman, E.
(1974). Frame analysisNew York: Harper.
7.
Gottman, J. M.
(1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigationsNew York: Academic Press.
8.
Grotevant, H. D.
(1986). Assessment of identity development: Current issues and future directions. Journal of Adolescent Research, 1, 175-182.
9.
Gumperz, J. J.
(1982). Discourse strategiesCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Kagan, J.
(1983). Classification of the child. In W. Kessen (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology, Vol. I. History, theory and methods (pp. 527 -560). New York: Wiley.
11.
Kuhn, D.
(1978). Mechanisms of cognitive and social development: One psychology or two?Human Development, 21, 92-118.
12.
Kuhn, T.
(1970). The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
13.
Larzelere, R. E.
, & Klein, D. M. (1986). Methodology. In M. B. Sussman & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Handbook of Marriage and the Family. (pp. 125-155), New York: Plenum.
14.
Lemer, R. M.
& Kauffman, M. B. (1985). The concept of development in contextualism. Developmental Review, 5, 309-333.
15.
Lewin, K.
(1931). Conflict between Aristotelian and Galilean modes of thought in psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 141-177.
16.
Maccoby, E.
& Martin, J. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol IV, Socializatiuon, personality, and social development (4th ed., pp. 1-101). New York: Wiley.
17.
Minuchin, P.
(1985). Families and invidiual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56, 289-302.
18.
Minuchin, P.
& Shapiro, E. K. (1983). The school as a context for social development. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, VoL L, Socialization, personality, and social development (pp. 197-274), New York: Wiley.
19.
Minuchin, S.
(1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
20.
Mussen, P. H.
(Gen. Ed.) (1983). Handbook of child psychology. New York: Wiley.
21.
Miller, P. H.
(1983). Theories of developmental psychology. San Francisco: Freeman.
22.
Napier, A. Y.
& Whittaker, C. (1978). The family crucible. New York: Bantam.
23.
Olson, D. H.
, Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1983). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: VI. theoretical update. Family Process, 22, 69-83.
24.
Overton, W. F.
, & Reese, H. W. (1973). Models of development: methodological implications. Lifespan developmental psychology: Research and theory. New York: Wiley.
25.
O'Connor, B.
(1987). A note on final causes and their role in contextualism. Developmental Review, 7145-148.
26.
Patterson, G. R.
(1982). Coercive family processEugene, OR: Castalia.
27.
Patterson, G. R.
(1986). Peformance models for antisocial boys. American Psychologist, 41, 432-444.
28.
Pepper, S. P.
(1942). World hypothesesBerkeley: University of California Press.
29.
Reese, H. W.Overton, W. F.
(1970). Models of development and theories of development. In L. R. Goulet & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Lifespan developmental psychology: Research and theory (pp. 115-145). New York: Academic Press.
30.
Reiss, D.
(1981). The family's construction of reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
31.
Reiss, D.
, Oliveri, M. E., & Curd, K. (1983). Family paradigm and adolescent social behavior. In H. D. Grotevant & C. R. Cooper (Eds.), Adolescent development in the family, (pp. 77-92), San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Sameroff, A. J.
(1983). Developmental systems: contexts and evolution. In W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology Vol. I. History, theory, and methods (pp. 237 -294), New York: Wiley.
33.
Selman, R.
& Demorest, A. (1984). Observing troubled children's interpersonal negotiation strategies. Implications of and for a developmental model. Child Development, 55, 288-304.
34.
Siegal, I. E.
& Parke, R. (in press). Structured analysis of parent-child research models. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.
35.
White, K. M., Braverman, M. & Speisman, J. C. (1987). Gender and marital status as predictors of individual and relationship development. Unpublished manuscript, Boston University.
36.
White, K. M.
, Speisman, J. C. & Costos, D. (1983). Young adults and their parents: Individuation to mutualisty. In H. D. Grotevant & C. R. Cooper (Eds.), New directions for child development: Adolescent development in the family (pp. 61-76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Wohlwill, J. F.
(1973). The study of behaviorial developmentNew York: Academic Press.
38.
Youniss, J.
& Smollar, J. (1985). Adolescent relations with mothers, fathers, and friend&Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
Youniss, J.
(1987). Contextualism: The social meditation of development. Symposium presented at meetings of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore, MD.
