Students with disabilities graduate from high schools at a rate that is half that of their general education peers. This low rate endures despite access to educational programs that should be tailored to students' unique needs. This situation raises concern about how to help more students stay in school until graduation. One avenue worth considering is whether schools have satisfied the various legal standards designed to ensure that students benefit from an appropriate education. This article considers these legal standards and suggests that, in some cases, schools may fall short of their obligations to these students. Specifically, schools may need to treat the decision to drop students from schools as a change in placement, afford these students various due process procedures, and regard dropout prevention as a related service.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blackorby, J., Edgar, E., & Kortering, L. (1991). A third of our youth: A look at the problem of school dropout students with mild handicaps. The Journal of Special Education, 25,102-113.
2.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
3.
Bound, J., & Johnson, G. (1992). Changes in the structure of wages in the 1980's: An evaluation of alternative explanations. American Economic Review, 82, 371-392.
4.
Bowditch, C. (1993). Getting rid of troublemakers: High school disciplinary procedures and the production of dropouts. Social Problems , 40, 493-509.
5.
Capital Publications. ( 1997). Special education dropout rate remains stagnant. SpecialEducation Law Reporter, 23(1), 1-2.
6.
Cedar Rapids Community School District v. Garret F., 119 S. Ct. 992 (1999).
7.
Chambers, J., Parrish, T., Lieberman, J., & Woman, J. (1998). What are we spending on special education in the U.S.?CSEF Brief, 8, 1-4.
8.
Chemerinsky, E., (1997). Constitutional law principles and policies. New York: Aspen.
9.
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Education v. Riley, 106 F.3d 559 (4th Cir. 1997).
10.
Daniel R. R. v.StateBoard of Education, 874 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1989).
11.
Department of Education Regulations, 34 C.F.R. sec. 300.550.
12.
Dorn, S. (1996). Creating the dropout: An institutional and social history of school failure. Westport, CT: Praeger.
13.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94-142, 89 Stat. 773 (1975).
14.
Evans v. Board of Education of the Rhinebeck Central School District, 930 F.Supp. 83 (S.D.N.Y. 1996).
15.
Finn, J. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.
16.
Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1974).
17.
Harlowe, C. (1994). Comparing federal and state prison inmates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
18.
Hashimito, M., & Miller, R. (1996). Labor market performance of non-college bound youths. Columbus: Ohio State University , Center for Labor Research.
19.
Hayden, M., & Gaylord, V. (1994). Are we pushing students in special education to drop out? PolicyResearch Brief, 6(1), 1-11.
20.
Hight, J. (1998). Young worker participation in post-school education and training. Monthly Labor Review, 121, 14-21.
21.
Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305 (1988).
22.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400-1487 (1997).
23.
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, 468 U.S. 883 (1984).
24.
Janosz, M., LeBlanc, M., Boulerice, B., & Tremblay, R., (1997). Disentangling the weight of school dropout predictors: A test of two longitudinal samples. Journal of Youth and Adolescence , 26, 733-763.
25.
Kortering, L., & Blackorby, J. (1992). High school dropout and students with behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 24-32.
26.
Kortering, L., & Braziel, P. (1999a). School dropout from the perspective of former students: Implications for secondary special education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 78-83.
27.
Kortering, L., & Braziel, P. (1999b). Staying in school: The perspective of ninth-grade students. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 106-113.
28.
Kortering, L., Hess, R., & Braziel, P. (1997). School dropout. In G. Bear, K. Minke, & A. Thomas (Eds.), Children's needs II: Development, problems, and alternatives. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
29.
Kortering, L., Julnes, R., & Edgar, E. (1990). An instructive review of the law pertaining to the graduation of special education students. Remedial and Special Education, 11, 7-13.
30.
Lewis, A. (1996). Words about the future. Phi Delta Kappan,77, 466.
31.
Markay, J. (1988). The labor market problems of today's high school dropouts. Monthly Labor Review, 111, 36-43.
32.
Neely v. Rutherford County School, 68 F.3d 965 (6th Cir. 1995), certiorari denied, 517 U.S. 1134 (1996).
33.
Obasohan, A., & Kortering, L. (1999). Dropping out of school: Comparing the perceptions of teachers and dropouts. Journal for At-Risk Youth, 5, 19-26.
34.
Oberti v. Board of Education of the Borough of Clementon School District, No. 91-cv-02818 (D.N.J.), affirmed without opinion, 101 F.3d 691 (3rd Cir. 1996).
35.
Odden, A., Monk, D., Nakib, Y., & Picus, L. (1995). The story of the education dollar: No academy awards and no fiscal smoking guns. Phi Delta Kappan,76, 161-168.
36.
Office of Special Education. (1998). Nineteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the IDEA. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
37.
Reich, R. (1992). The work of nations. New York : Vintage Books.
38.
Rumberger, R. (1983). Dropping out of school: The influence of race, sex, and family background. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 199-220.
39.
Sacramento City Unified School District v. Holland, 14 F.3d 1398 (9th Cir. 1994), certiorari denied, 512 U.S. 1207 (1994).
40.
Sherri v. Kirby, 77 Ed. Law Rep. 665 (1992).
41.
Sinclair, M., Christenson, S., Evelo, D., & Hurley, C. (1998). Dropout prevention for youth with disabilities: Efficacy of a sustained school engagement procedure. Exceptional Children, 65, 7-21.
42.
Speilberg v. Henrico County Public Schools, 853 F.2d 256 (4th Cir. 1988), certiorari denied, 489 U.S. 1016 (1989).
43.
Stern, D., Woo-Paik, I., Catterall, J., & Nakata, Y., (1989). Labor market experiences of teenagers with and without diplomas. Economics of Education Review, 8, 233-246.
44.
Thurlow, M., Christenson, M., Sinclair, M., & Evelo, D. (1997). Wanting the unwanted: Keeping those "out of here" kids in school. BeyondBehavior, 8, 10-16.
45.
United States Congress and Administration News. ( 1975). Aid to Education of the Handicapped Act approved (pp. 651-656). St Paul, MN: West.
46.
Weil v. Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, 931 F. 2d 1069 (5th Cir. 1991).
