Since the passage of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act in 1975, problems remain regarding appropriate placement of children into least restrictive learning environments in physical education. Many educational placements are ineffective for reasons that have little relationship to the children's abilities, and this has resulted in an ongoing need to seek alternative methods of assessing children for appropriate class placements. Parents have always been involved in this decision-making process. As advocacy and training programs have increased their effectiveness as resource personnel, parents' roles in the education process have broadened. Because of parents' enhanced capabilities as support personnel, and the crucial roles they play in their children's educational programs, this study investigated parents' perspectives regarding the factors essential for placement of children with disabilities into integrated physical education programs. Seventy-five parents completed a 21-item survey to determine factors essential for integrated physical education programs. Results suggested that class size, program support, physical and communicative skills, health status, and motivation were prerequisites of an effectively integrated program.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aufsesser, P.M. (1991). Mainstreaming and the least restrictive environment: How do they differ?Palaestra, 7, 31-34.
2.
Auxter, D., Pyfer, J., & Huettig, C. (1997). Adapted physical education and recreation (8th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.
3.
Block, M.E., & Krebs, P.L. (1992). An alternative to least restrictive environments: A continuum of support to regular physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 9, 97-113.
4.
Block, M.E., & Zeman, R. (1996). Including students with disabilities in regular physical education: Effects on nondisabled children. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 13, 38-49.
5.
Boe, E.E. (1991, January). Analyzing teacher supply and demand: The role of national survey data. Paper presented at the Annual Conference on Elementary-Secondary Education Management and Information Systems, Orlando, Florida.
6.
Broadhead, G.D. (1985). Placement of mildly handicapped children in physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 307-313.
7.
Carlson, E. & Parshall, L. (1996). Academic, social and behavioral adjustment of students declassified from special education. Exceptional Education, 63, 89-102.
8.
Churton, M. (1987). Impact of the Education of the Handicapped Act on adapted physical education: A 10-year overview. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 4, 1-8.
9.
Churton, M. (1988). Federal law and adapted physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 5, 278-284.
10.
DePaepe, J. (1984). Mainstreaming malpractice. The Physical Educator, 41, 51-56.
11.
Diamond, D.B. (1991, August 11). Program helps parents think of themselves as teachers. Chicago Tribune, p.5.
12.
Dunn, J.M., & Craft, D. (1985). Mainstreaming theory and practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 273-176.
13.
Dunn, J.M., & Fait, H. (1989). Special physical education: Adapted, individualized, developmental (6th ed.). Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.
14.
Dunn, J.M., Morehouse, J.W., & Fredericks, H.D. (1986). Physical education for the severely handicapped: A systematic approach to a data based gymnasium . Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
15.
Ehlers, V.L., & Ruffin, M. (1990). The Missouri project—parents as teachers. Focus onExceptional Children, 23(2), 1-14.
16.
Education of All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
17.
Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1986, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
18.
Epstein, J.L., & Dauber, S.L. (1989). Teachers' attitudes and practices of parent involvement in inner city elementary and middle schools. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University, Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
19.
Ersing, W.F., & Huber, J.H. (1992). Considerations for clinical programs in adapted physical education. Palaestra, 9, 38-42.
Fredericks, H.D., Baldwin, V.L., McDonnell, J.J., Hofmann, R. & Harter, J. (1971). Parents educate their trainable children. Mental Retardation, 9, 24-26.
22.
French, N.K. (1996). Connecting teachers and families: Using the family as a lab. Journal of Teacher Education, 47, 335-346.
23.
French, R.W. (1979). The use of homework as a supportive technique in physical education. The Physical Educator, 36, 84-88.
24.
Hanline, M.F., & Halvorsen, A. (1989). Parent perceptions of the integration transition process: Overcoming artificial barriers. Exceptional Children , 55, 487-492.
25.
Hilton, A., & Henderson, C.J. (1993). Parent involvement: A best practice of forgotten practice?Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 199-211.
26.
Hopper, C., Gruber, M.B., Muñoz, K., & Herb, R.A. (1992). Effect of including parents in home based exercise and nutrition programs for children. Research Quarterly for Exercise andSport, 63, 315-321.
27.
Horvat, M.A. (1982). Effect of a home learning program of learning disabled children's balance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 1158.
28.
Jansma, P., & Decker, J. (1990). Project LRE/PE: Least restrictive environment usage in physical education. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services (Grant G008730022).
29.
Jansma, P. & French, R.W. (1994). Special physical education: Physical activity, sports and recreation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
Jansma, P., & Schultz, B. (1982). Validation of the use of a mainstreamed attitude inventory with physical educators. American Corrective Therapy Journal, 36, 150-157.
31.
Johnson, W.R. (1981). Parent education in clinical physical education and recreation. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 52(6), 34-36.
32.
Karper, W.B., & Martinek, T.J. (1985). The integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children in elementary physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 314-319.
33.
Kasser, S.L., Collier, D. & Solava, D.G. (1997). Sport skills for students with disabilities: A collaborative effort. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 68(1), 50-53, 56.
34.
Kelly, L. (1987). Instructional time. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 60(6), 29-32.
35.
Kennedy, S.O., French, R.W., & Henderson, H.L. (1989). The due-able process could happen to you! Physical educators, handicapped students and the law. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 60, 86-93.
36.
Lacy, A., LaMaster, K., & Tommaney, W. (1996). Teacher behaviors and student academic learning time in physical education. The Physical Educator, 53(1), 44-50.
37.
Lavay, B., Foret, C., Dempsey, S., & Loovis, M. (1987). Is mainstreaming in physical education, recreation, and dance working?Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 58(8), 14-15.
38.
Maguire, P. (1994). Developing successful collaborative relationships . Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 65(1), 32-36, 44.
39.
Mundschenk, N.A., & Foley, R.M. (1994). Collaborative relationships between school and home: Implications for service delivery. Preventing School Failure, 39(1), 16-20.
40.
NICHY News Digest. (1988). Children with disabilities: Understanding sibling issues. National Information Center for Children and Youth with Handicaps, 11, 1-11.
41.
Peterson, N. (1987). Early intervention for handicapped and at-risk children. Denver: Love.
42.
Rarick, G.L., & Beuter, A.C. (1985). The effects of mainstreaming on the motor performance of mentally retarded and nonhandicapped students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 2, 277-282.
43.
Rizzo, T.L., Davis, W., & Toussaint, R. (1994). Inclusion in regular classes: Breaking from traditional curricula. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance , 65(1), 24-26, 47.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1996). Teacher perceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion, 1958-1995: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 62, 59-74.
46.
Sherrill, C. (1993). Adapted physical activity, recreation and sport: Cross-disciplinary and lifespan (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
47.
Sherrill, C. (Ed.). (1988). Leadership training in adapted physical education. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
48.
Sherrill, C. (1980, April). Assessment of an administrative commitment to mainstreaming. Paper presented at the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education and Recreation Annual Convention, Detroit.
49.
Sherrill, C., & Megginson, N. (1984). A needs assessment instrument for local school district use in adapted physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 1, 147-157.
50.
Titus, J.A., & Watkinson, E.J. (1987). Effects of segregated and integrated programs on the participation and social interaction of moderately mentally handicapped children in play. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 4, 204-219.
51.
U.S. Department of Education. (1995). Seventeenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of the Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Vogler, E.W., van der Mars, H., Darst, P., & Cusimano, B. (1990). Relationship of presage, context, and process variables to ALT-PE of elementary level mainstreamed students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 7, 298-313.
