Forty-four dropout youth with learning disabilities, behavior disorders, or mild mental retardation participated in an interview that included questions about school dropout. We categorized responses and identified key themes. Dominant themes were the need for teachers and administrators to change their attitude toward and treatment of these youth and the need for the youth themselves to change their attitude and behavior. Other themes included the need for more support from teachers, for changes in attendance and discipline policies, for better textbooks, and for a change in the way certain courses are taught.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Audette, B., & Algozzine, B. (1992). Free and appropriate education for all students: Total quality and the transformation of American public education. Remedial and Special Education, 13(6), 8-18.
2.
Bartnick, W., & Parkay, F. (1991). A comparative analysis of the "holding power" of general and exceptional education programs. Remedial and Special Education, 12(5), 17-22.
3.
Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399-414.
4.
Capital Publications (1997 ). Special education dropout rate remains stagnant. SpecialEducation Law Reporter, 23(1), 1-2.
5.
Catterall, J.S. (1987). An intensive group counseling dropout prevention intervention: Some cautions on isolating at-risk adolescents with high schools . American Educational Research Journal, 24, 521-540.
6.
Constas, M.A. (1992). Qualitative analysis as a public event: the documentation of category development procedures. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 253-266.
7.
Finn, J.D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.
8.
Freeman, J., & Hutchinson, N. (1994). An adolescent with learning disabilities. Eric: The perspective of a potential dropout. CanadianJournal of Special Education, 9, 131-147.
9.
Goodlad, J. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future . New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Guterman, B. (1995). The validity of categorical learning disability services: The consumer's view. Exceptional Children, 62, 11-24.
11.
Hamilton, S.F. (1986). Raising standards and reducing dropout rates. Teachers College Record, 87, 410-429.
12.
Hamilton, S., & Hamilton, M.A. (1992) Mentoring programs: Promise and paradox. Phi Delta Kappan,73, 546-550.
13.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N. (1985). Kaufman test of educational achievement. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service .
14.
Jay, D., & Padilla, C. (1987). Special education dropouts: The incidence of and reasons for droppng out of special education in California. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
15.
Lichtenstein, S. (1993). Transition from school to adulthood: Case studies of adults with learning disabilities who dropped out of school. Exceptional Children, 59, 336-347.
16.
Livingston, H. (1959). Key to the dropout problem: The elementary school . Elementary School Journal, 59, 267-270.
17.
Mann, D. (1986). Can we help dropouts? Thinking about the undoable . Teachers College Record, 87, 307-323.
18.
McMillian, M., Kaufman, P., & Klein, S. (1997). Dropout rates in the United States: 1995. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
19.
Natriello, G., Pallas, A.M., & McDill, E.L. (1986). Taking stock: Renewing our research agenda on the causes and consequences of dropping out. Teachers College Record, 87, 430-440.
20.
Newmann, F.M. (1981) Reducing student alienation in high schools: Implications of theory. Harvard Educational Review, 51, 546-564.
21.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (1994). Dropout data: Data report and summary. Raleigh, NC: Author.
22.
NorthCarolina StateBoard of Education. (1996). Policy manual. Raleigh: North Carolina Department of Public Instruction .
23.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector from school-house, city hall, to the pentagon. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
24.
Peters, T.J., & Waterman, R.H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies. New York: Warner.
25.
Seidal, J., & Vaughn, S. (1991). Social alienation and the learning disabled school dropout. Learning Disabilities Research, 6, 152-157.
26.
Simon, J.L., & Burstein, P. (1985). Basic research methods in social science (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
27.
Sitlington, P., & Frank, A. (1993). Dropouts with learning disabilities: What happens to them as young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 8, 244-252.
28.
Wagner, M. (1989). The transition experiences of youth with disabilities: A report on the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
29.
Wagner, M. (1991). Dropouts with disabilities: What do we know? What can we do?Menlo Park, CA: SRI International .
30.
Wehlage, G. (1983). The marginal high school student: Defining the problem and searching for policy. Children and Youth Services Review, 5, 321-342.
31.
Wehlage, G., & Rutter, M. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem?Teachers College Record, 87, 374-392.
32.
Woodring, P. (1990). A new approach to the dropout problem. Phi Delta Kappan,71, 468-469.
