Paraeducators have become vital contributors to service delivery in special education programs. The duties of paraeducators and their performance of those duties are much discussed but not well documented. The supervision of paraeducators falls largely on the shoulders of special education teachers who are relatively unprepared to assume this supervisory role. This study served as an initial exploration into (a) the relationship between 18 matched pairs of teachers and paraeducators assigned to resource programs, (b) the duties that these paraeducators performed, (c) their preparation for the job, (d) the quality of their work, and (e) the thinking of the teachers who held supervisory responsibility. Results indicated that the paraeducators served primarily in instructional roles and that their performance was satisfactory. Teachers were divided in their beliefs about the fundamental role of paraeducators---whether they were assistants to the teacher or assistants to the student. Teachers said, in many different ways, that they were reluctant to provide supervision, and preferred to think of paraeducators as peers rather than supervisees.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. (1991) A study of the paraprofessional/professional supervisory relationship in special education programs in Kansas schools. Topeka: Kansas State Board of Education.
2.
Blalock, G., Rivera, D., Andreson, K., & Kottler, B. (1992). A school district/university partnership in paraprofessional training. LD Forum, 17(3), 29–36.
3.
Boomer, L. W. (1977, April). The paraprofessional in special education. Paper presented at the annual international convention of The Council for Exceptional Children, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 140 582).
4.
Boomer, L. W. (1980). Special education paraprofessionals: A guide for teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 12, 146–149.
5.
Boomer, L. W. (1982). The paraprofessional: A valued resource for special children and their teachers. Teaching Exceptional Children, 14, 194–197.
6.
Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of peer tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237–248.
7.
Courson, F. H., & Heward, W. L. (1988). Increasing active student response through the effective use of paraprofessionals. The Pointer, 33(1), 27–31.
8.
DeFur, S. H., & Taymans, J. M. (1995). Competencies needed for transition specialists in vocational rehabilitation, vocational education and special education. Exceptional Children, 62, 38–51.
9.
Escudero, G. R., & Sears, J. (1982). Teachers' and teacher aides' perceptions of their responsibilities when teaching severely and profoundly handicapped students. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 17, 190–195.
10.
Evans, S. S., & Evans, W. H. (1986). Training needs of special education paraprofessionals: Results of a survey conducted by a community college. New Directions, 7(2), 1, 4–6.
11.
Frank, A. R., Keith, R. Z., & Steil, D. A. (1988). Training needs of special education paraprofessionals. Exceptional Children, 55, 253–258.
12.
Frith, G. H., & Lindsey, J. D. (1982). Certification, training, and other programming variables affecting special education and the paraprofessional concept. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 229–236.
13.
Gerlach, K. (1994). Strengthening the partnership: Recognizing the paraeducator's role. Paraphrase, 1(1), 1–3.
14.
Giangreco, M. F., Edelman, S. W., Luiselli, T. E. & MacFarland, S. Z. C. (1997). Helping or hovering? Effects of instructional assistant proximity on students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 64, 7–18.
15.
Gladstone, B. W., & Spencer, C. J. (1977). The effects of modeling on the contingent praise of mental retardation counsellors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 75–84.
16.
Handelsman, M. M. (1986). Problems with ethics training by “osmosis.”Professional Psychology, 17, 371–372.
17.
Harrington R.G., & Mitchelson, D. (1986). A report on special education paraprofessional effectiveness. Topeka: Kansas State Department of Education.
18.
Haselkorn, D., & Fideler, E. (1996). Breaking the class ceiling: Paraeducator pathways to teaching. Belmont, MA: Recruiting New Teachers.
19.
Heller, W. (1997). Professional and ethical responsibilities. In A. L. Pickett & K. Gerlach (Eds.), Supervising Paraeducators in School Settings: A team approach (pp. 207–234). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
20.
Hennike, J. M., & Taylor, D. E. (1973). Teachers' perceptions of teacher aide roles and responsibilities. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 8, 15–19.
21.
Hofmeister, A. M. (1993). Paraprofessionals in special education: Alternatives to casteism. New Directions, 14(3), 1–3.
22.
Howe, K. R., & Miramontes, O. B. (1992). The ethics of special education: Professional ethics in education series. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997, P.L. 105--17, 20U.S.C. $1400 et seq.
24.
Innocenti, M. (1993). Paraprofessionals in early intervention; some information and some ideas. New Directions, 14(4), 1–2.
25.
Jones, K. H., & Bender, W. N. (1993). Utilization of paraprofessionals in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 14(1), 7–14.
26.
Kaplan, G. R. (1977). From aide to teacher: The story of the career opportunities program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
27.
Kaplan, G. R. (1980). Special needs, special people: The training of paraprofessionals and the education of children with handicaps. New York: National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals in Special Education, City University of New York.
28.
Lamont, L. L., & Hill, J. L. (1991). Roles and responsibilities of paraprofessionals in the regular elementary classroom. BC Journal of Special Education, 15(1), 1–24.
29.
Lindeman, D. P., & Beegle, G. B. (1988). Preservice teacher training and use of the classroom paraprofessional: A national survey. Teacher Education and Special Education, 11, 184–186.
30.
Logue, O. J. (1993, March). Job satisfaction and retention variables of special education paraeducators. Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Conference on the Training and Employment of Paraprofessionals in Education and Related Services, Seattle, WA.
31.
May, D. C., & Marozas, D. S. (1986). Working with paraprofessionals: Are teachers of persons with severe handicapping conditions being prepared for this responsibility?Division for the Physically Handicapped Journal, 9, 22–26.
32.
McKenzie, R. G., & Houk, C. S. (1986). The paraprofessional in special education. Exceptional Children, 53, 41–45.
33.
Miramontes, O. B. (1990). Organizing for effective paraprofessional services in special education: A multilingual/multiethnic instructional service team model. Remedial and Special Education, 12(1), 29–36.
34.
Morgan, B. (1997, May). The s----- word: What teachers consider important in the supervision of paraeducators. Paper presented at the 16th Annual Conference on the Training and Employment of the Paraprofessional Workforce in Education, Rehabilitation and Related Fields, Los Angeles, CA.
35.
National Association of State Directors of Special Education (1997). Overview of the professional development requirements: 1997 IDEA Amendments. Washington, DC: Author.
36.
Passaro, P. D., Pickett, A. L., Latham, G., & HongBo, W. (1991). The training and support needs of paraprofessionals in rural special education settings. Unpublished report, Mountain Plains Regional Resource Center, Utah State University-Logan.
37.
Pearman, E. L., Suhr, D., & Gibson, F. (1993). Colorado system of personnel development needs assessment: Paraprofessionals. Denver: Colorado Department of Education.
38.
Pickett, A. L. (1989). Restructuring the schools: The role of paraprofessionals. Results in Education. Washington, DC: National Governors Association.
39.
Pickett, A. L. (1996). A state of the art report on paraeducators in education and related services. New York: National Resource Center for Paraprofessionals in Education and Related Services, City University of New York.
40.
Pickett, A. L., Vasa, S. F., & Steckelberg, A. L. (1993). Using paraeducators effectively in the classroom. (Fastback 358). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
41.
Reid, B., & Johnston, M. (1978). Paraprofessionals in education for the severely/profoundly handicapped. In N. G. Haring & D. D. Bricker (Eds.), Teaching the severely handicapped (pp. 77–93). Columbus, OH: Special Press.
42.
Reinoehl, R. B., & Halle, J. W. (1994). Increasing the assessment probe performance of teacher aides through written prompts. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 32–42.
43.
Rubin, P. M. (1994). Who is teaching our children: A look at the use of aides in chapter 1. Washington, DC: International Reading Association.
44.
Salzberg, C. L., & Morgan, J. (1995). Preparing teachers to work with paraeducators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 18, 49–55.
45.
Stahl, B. J., & Lorenz, G. (1995). Views on paraprofessionals. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Education.
46.
Stephens, T. M. (1985). Personal behavior and professional ethics: Implications for special educators. Journal of Medical Ethics, 11, 47–53.
47.
Striffler, N. (1993). Current trends in the use of paraprofessionals in early intervention and preschool services. Chapel Hill, NC: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System.
48.
Turney, D. T., (1962). Secretaries for teachers. Nashville, TN: Department of Education, George Peabody College for Teachers.
49.
U.S. Department of Education, Center for Education Statistics. (1987). Public school student members and staff, 1986--87. Washington, D.C.: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.
50.
Vasa, S. F., Steckelberg, A. L., & Ulrich-Ronning, L. V. (1983). Guide for effective utilization of paraprofessionals in special education. Lincoln: Department of Special Education and Communicative Disorders, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
51.
Wallace, T. (1996, Winter). Community supports for people with disabilities: Core certificate and specialized diploma program. Para Link, pp. 3, 9.
52.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description. Analysis, and Interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
