Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, B., & Richardson, K. (1993). Ethics, advocacy, and empowerment: Issues of method in researching language. Language and Communication, 13(2). 81--94.
2.
Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Chen, H. T. (1994). Current trends and future directions in program evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15, 229--238.
4.
Fetterman, D. (1994). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1–15.
5.
Gallagher, J. (1979). Rights of the next generation. Exceptional Children, 46, 98--105.
6.
Hines, M. L. (1987). Don't get mad: Get powerfull A manual for building advocacy skills.Lansing, MI: Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service.
7.
Langenbach, M., Vaughn, C., & Aagaard, L. (1994). An introduction to educational research.Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Cuba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
Mertens, D. M., & McLaughlin, J.A. (1995). Research methods in special education.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
Moats, L. C., & Lyon, G. R. (1993). Learning disabilities in the United States: Advocacy, science, and the future of the field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 282--294.
11.
Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization-focused evaluation. (2nd ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Stufflebeam, D. (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to go. Evaluation Practice, 15, 321--338.
