Structural equation modeling is a method for analysis of multivariate data from both nonexperimental and experimental research. the method combines a structural model linking latent variables and a measurement model linking observed variables with latent variables. its use in special education research has been limited to date, but the approach offers promise as a method useful in theory-based research. a nontechnical introduction to the method and cautions concerning the limits of its use are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alwin, D. F., & Thornton, A. (1984). Family origins and the schooling process: Early versus late influence of parental characteristics. American Sociological Review, 49, 784--802.
2.
Bentler, P. M. (1985). Theory and implementation of EQS: A structural equations program.Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.
3.
Bentler, P. M. (1987). Structural modeling and the scientific method: Comments on Freedman's critique. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 151--157.
4.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables.New York: Wiley.
5.
Duncan, O. D. (1966). Path analysis: Sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology, 72, 1--16.
6.
Entwisle, D. R., & Hayduk, L. A. (1982). Early schooling: Cognitive and affective outcomes.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7.
Freedman, D. A. (1987). As others see us: A case study in path analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 101--128.
8.
Goldberger, A. S. (1972). Structural equation methods in the social sciences. Econometrics, 40, 979--1001.
9.
Goldberger, A. S., & Duncan, O. D. (1973). Structural equation models in the social sciences.New York: Seminar Press.
10.
Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
Idol-Maestas, L., & Rock, S. (1981). Recent research literature on the mildly handicapped. Teacher Education and Special Education, 4(4), 3–7.
12.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In A. S. Goldberger & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85–112). New York: Academic Press.
13.
Jöreskog, K. G. (1985). LISREL. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 87--90). New York: Wiley.
14.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 user's reference guide.Chicago: Scientific Software.
15.
Jöreskog, K. G., & van Thillo, M. (1973). LISREL: A general computer program for estimating a linear structural equation system involving multiple indicators of unmeasured variables. (Research report 37--5). Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala.
16.
Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality.New York: Wiley.
17.
Long, J. S. (1983a). Confirmatory factor analysis (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. No. 07--033). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
18.
Long, J. S. (1983b). Covariance structure models: An introduction to LISREL (Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, No. 07--034). Beverly Hills. CA: Sage.
19.
Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 231--248.
20.
McCubbin, H. L., & Patterson, J. (1983). Family stress adaptation to crises: A double ABCX model of family behavior. In H. McCubbin, M. Sussman, & J. Patterson (Eds.), Social stresses and the family: Advances and developments in fmaily stress theory and research (pp. 7–37). New York: Haworth Press.
21.
McGrew, K. S., Bruininks, R. H., Thurlow, M. I., & Lewis, D. R. (1992). Empirical analysis of multidimensional measures of community adjustment for young adults with mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 475--487.
22.
Miller-Jones, C. (1984). Untangling the correlational relationship between language and reading acquisition. Remedial and Special Education, 5(3), 50–59.
23.
Muthén, B. O. (1987). Response to Freedman's critique of path analysis: Improve credibility by better methodological training. Journal of Educational Statistics, 12, 178--184.
24.
Nelson, F. H., Lomax, R. G., & Perlman, R. (1984). A structural equation model of second language acquisition for adult learners. Journal of Experimental Education, 53(1), 29–39.
25.
Orr, R. R., Cameron, S. J., & Day, D. M. (1991). Coping with stress in families with children who have mental retardation: An evaluation of the double ABCX model. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 95, 444--450.
26.
Pedlhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in bahavioral research.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27.
Popper, K. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery.New York: Harper.
28.
Roberts, C., & Zubrick, S. (1992). Factors influencing the social status of children with mild academic disabilities in regular classrooms. Exceptional Children, 59, 192--202.
29.
Schack, G. D. (1989). Self-efficacy as a mediator in the creative productivity of gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12, 231--249.
30.
Swanson, H. L., Plank, D., & Still, J. (1988). The characteristics of prominent articles with “Special Education” in the Title. Remedial and Special Education, 9(5), 41–49.
31.
Werts, C. E., & Linn, R. L. (1970). Path analysis: Psychological examples, Psychological Bulletin, 74, 193--212.
32.
Wesson, C., Deno, S., Mirkin, P., Maruyama, G., Skiba, R., King, R., & Sevcik, B. (1988). A causal analysis of the relationships among ongoing curriculum-based measurement and evaluation, the structure of instruction, and student achievement. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 330--343.
33.
Wright, S. (1918). On the nature of size factors. Genetics, 3, 367--374.
