A Comparison of Two Methods of Administering Group Reading Inventories to Diverse Learners

Abstract

This study examined the level of agreement between two methods of administering group reading inventories, computer and pencil and paper, leading to placing 72 secondary students, 38 males and 34 females, into three instructional groups—teacher directed, dyadic, and independent. The students, 13 with learning disabilities, 16 remedial, and 43 normally achieving, were enrolled in science and social studies classes in middle school and high school. In one condition, students read textbook passages presented on computer, completed study guides, and took 15-item tests on computer. In the other condition, the same students read passages from their textbooks, completed study guides, and took 15-item tests with pencil and paper. An equivalent time samples design was arranged, with four computer assessments and four pencil-and-pape r assessments randomly assigned. The dependent measures consisted of two types of test items, factual and interpretive. The results of group analysis significantly favored the computer overall on factual questions, with individual analyses indicating few significant differences resulting from the two types of group reading inventories. On interpretive test items, the results of group analysis revealed no significant difference between the two assessment methods, a finding generally corroborated by the individual analyses. Correlation coefficients substantiated significant positive relationships between the dependent measures and the group reading inventories. Overall, the placement of students in three instructional groups was identical for each type of group reading inventory in 72% of individual comparisons. Several recommendations for teachers are presented and discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armbruster, B. B. (1984). The problem of “inconsiderate text.” In G. G. Duffy , L. R. Roehler , & J. Mason (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Perspectives and suggestions (pp. 202–217). New York: Longman.

Bergerud, D. , Lovitt, T. C. , & Horton, S. V. (1988). The effectiveness of textbook adaptations in life science for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 70–76.

Berkin, C. , & Wood, L. (1983). Land of promise. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.

Biddle, B. , Bank, B. , Anderson, D. , & Keats, D. (1981). The structure of idleness: Inschool and dropout adolescent activities in the United States and Australia. The Sociology of Education, 54, 106–119.

Budoff, M. , Thorman, J. , & Grass, A. (1984). Microcomputers in special education. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.

Campbell, D. T. , & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Coffman, J. E. , & Joyce, W. W. (1983). Latin America and Canada. Chicago: Follett.

Ebel, R. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Eckstrom, R. , Goertz, M. , Pollack, J. , & Rock, A. (1987). Who drops out of high school and why? Findings from a national study. Teachers College Record, 87, 356–373.

10.

Edgington, E. (1987). Randomization tests. New York: Marcel Dekker.

11.

Fuchs, L. S. , Hamlett, C. L. , Fuchs, D. , Stecker, P. M. , & Ferguson, C. (1988). Conducting curriculum-based measurement with computerized data collection: Effects on efficiency and teacher satisfaction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 9(2), 73–86.

12.

Hahn, A. (1987). Reaching out to America's dropouts: What to do? Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 253–256.

13.

Horton, S. V. , Boone, R. A. , & Lovitt, T. C. (1990). Teaching social studies to learning disabled high school students: Effects of a hypertext study guide. British Journal of Educational Technology, 21, 118–131.

14.

Horton, S. V., & Lovitt, T. C. (1988). [Oral reading rates of learning disabled adolescents]. Unpublished raw data.

15.

Horton, S. V. , & Lovitt, T. C. (1989). Using study guides with three classifications of secondary students. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 447–462.

16.

Horton, S. V. , Lovitt, T. C. , & Bergerud, D. (1989). Construction and implementation of graphic organizers for academically handicapped and regular secondary students. Academic Therapy, 24, 625–640.

17.

Horton, S. V. , Lovitt, T. C. , & Bergerud, D. (1990). The effectiveness of graphic organizers for three classifications of secondary students in content area classes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 12–22, 29.

18.

Horton, S. V., Lovitt, T. C., & Christensen, C. (1988). Effectiveness of matching three classifications of secondary students to differential levels of graphic organizers: Diagnosis, prescription, and management. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from S. V. Horton, 16105 NE 106th St., Redmond, WA 98052)

19.

Horton, S. V. , Lovitt, T. C. , & Christensen, C. (1991a). Matching three classifications of secondary students to differential levels of study guides. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 518–529.

20.

Horton, S. V. , Lovitt, T. C. , & Christensen, C. (1991b). Notetaking from textbooks: Effects of a columnar format for three categories of secondary students. Exceptionality, 2, 19–40.

21.

Horton, S. V. , Lovitt, T. C. , & Givens, A. (1988). A computer-based vocabulary program for three categories of students. British Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 131–143.

22.

Horton, S. V. , Lovitt, T. C. , Givens, A. , & Nelson, R. (1989). Teaching social studies to secondary students with academic handicaps: Effects of a computerized study guide. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 102–107.

23.

Horton, S. V. , Lovitt, T. C. , & Slocum, T. (1988). Teaching geography to high school students with academic deficits: Effects of a computerized map tutorial. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 371–379.

24.

Keene, S. , & Davey, B. (1987). Effects of computer-presented text on LD adolescents' reading behaviors. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 283–290.

25.

Levin, H. , Zigmond, N. , & Birch, J. (1985). A follow-up study of 52 learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 2–7.

26.

Lovitt, T. C. , & Horton, S. V. (1988). How to develop study guides. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 3, 333–343.

27.

Lovitt, T. C. , & Horton, S. V. (1991). Adapting textbooks for mildly handicapped adolescents. In G. Stoner , M. R. Shinn , & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 439–471). Silver Springs, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

28.

Lovitt, T. C. , Horton, S. V. , & Bergerud, D. (1987). Matching students with textbooks: An alternative readability formulas and standardized tests. British Columbia Journal of Special Education, 2(1), 49–55.

29.

Magnoli, M. A. , Shymansky, J. A. , Blecha, M. K. , & Holly, J. C. (1983). Experiences in physical science. River Forest, IL: Laidlaw.

30.

Owings, J. , & Stocking, C. (1985). Characteristics of high school students who identify themselves as handicapped. High school and beyond: A national longitudinal study for the 1980s. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.

31.

Prescott, G.A. , Balow, I. H. , Hogan, T. P. , & Farr, R. C. (1984). The metropolitan achievement test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.

32.

Rumberger, R. (1987). High school dropout: A review of the issues and evidence. Review of Educational Research, 57, 101–121.

33.

Wehlage, G. , & Rutter, R. (1986). Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem? Teachers College Record, 87, 376–392.

34.

Zigmond, N. , & Thornton, H. (1985). Follow-up of post-secondary age LD graduates and dropouts. Learning Disabilities Research, 1(1), 50–55.