Twenty-two classroom teachers (grades 1 through 7) were interviewed to obtain information about how they use their social studies textbooks, the problems they experience, and their perceptions of the strengths and weaknesses of the texts. Teachers were also asked to describe the modifications or adaptations they made to help students who might have difficulty understanding the textbook. Results indicated that although teachers liked having the textbook as a resource, they were concerned about content and comprehensibility. Teachers tended to solve the problem of textbook difficulty in three ways: Helping students to cope with the textbook, deemphasizing the textbook, or reinforcing and extending textbook information.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, R. S., & Biddle, B. J. (1970), Realities of teaching: Explorations with video tape. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
2.
Armbruster, B. B., & Gudbrandsen, B. (1986), Reading comprehension instruction in social studies programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 36–48.
3.
Armbruster, B. B., & Ostertag, J. (1987, April), Questions in elementary science and social studies textbooks. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
4.
Beck, I. L., McKeown, M., & Gromoll, E. W. (1989), Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6(2), 99–153.
5.
Bos, C. S., & Vaughan, S. (1988), Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
Chapin, J. R., & Messick, R. G. (1989), Elementary social studies: A practical guide.New York: Longman.
7.
Chall, J. S., & Conard, S. S. (1991), Should textbooks challenge students?New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
Ciborowski, J. (1992), Textbooks and the students who can't read them: A guide to teaching content.Boston: Brookline.
9.
Conley, M. W. (1992), Content reading instruction: A communication approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Elliott, D. L., Nagel, K., & Woodward, A. (1985), Do textbooks belong in elementary social studies?Educational Leadership, 42(7), 21–28.
11.
Gagnon, P. (1987), Democracy's untold story: What world history textbooks neglect. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
12.
History-social science framework for California public schools. (1987). Sacramento: California State Board of Education.
13.
Hoge, J. D. (1986), Improving the use of elementary social studies textbooks.Bloomington, IN: ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 274 582)
14.
Jenkins, J. R., Jewell, M., Leicester, N., O'Connor, R., Jenkins, L. M., & Troutner, N. M. (1994), Accommodations for individual differences without classroom ability groups: An experiment in school restructuring. Exceptional Children, 60344–358.
15.
Kameenui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (1990), Designing instructional strategies: The prevention of academic learning problems. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
16.
Larkins, A., Hawkins, M., & Gilmore, A. (1987), Trivial and noninformative content of elementary social studies: A review of primary texts in four series. Theory and Research in Social Education, 15299–311.
17.
McCutcheon, G. (1981), Elementary school teachers' planning for social studies and other subjects. Theory and Research in Social Education, 945–66.
18.
National Association of State Boards of Education. (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. Alexandria, VA: Author.
19.
Schumm, J. S., & Strickler, K. (1991), Guidelines for adapting content area textbooks: Keeping teachers and students content. Intervention in School and Clinic, 2779–84.
20.
Seidel, J. (1988), The ethnograph: A user's guide version 3 [Computer program]. Corvallis, OR: Qualis Research Associates.
21.
Sewall, G. T. (1987), American history textbooks: An assessment of quality. New York: Educational Excellence Network.
22.
Shaver, J. P. (1989March). What is known about elementary school social studies? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
23.
Shaver, J. P., Davis, O. L., Jr., & Helburn, S. W. (1980), An interpretive report on the status of precollege social studies education based on three NSF-funded studies. In What are the needs in precollege science, mathematics, and social science education? Views from the field (pp. 3–18) (Publication SE-90). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
24.
Stainback, W., Stainback, S., Courtnage, L., & Jaben, T. (1985), Facilitating mainstreaming by modifying the mainstream. Exceptional Children, 52, 144–152.
25.
Stodolsky, S. (1988), The subject matters: Classroom activities in math and social studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26.
Stodolsky, S. (1989), Is teaching really by the book? In P. Jackson & S. Haroutunian-Gordon (Eds.), From Socrates to software: The teacher as text and the text as teacher. Eighty-eighth yearbook of the national society for the study of education (Part I, pp. 159–184). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Tyson-Bernstein, H., & Woodward, A. (1986), The great textbook machine and prospects for reform. Social Education, 50(1), 41–45.
28.
Vacca, R. T., & Vacca, J. L. (1989), Content area reading. Glenview, IL: Scott-Foresman.
29.
Will, M. C. (1986), Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52411–415.
30.
Woodward, A., Elliot, D. L., & Nagel, K. C. (1986), Beyond textbooks in elementary social studies. Social Education, 50(1), 50–53.
31.
Zigmond, N., & Baker, J. (1990), Project MELD: A preliminary report. Exceptional Children, 57176–185.
