Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Baroody, A. J., & Hume, J. (1991). Meaningful mathematics instruction: The case of fractions. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 54–68.
3.
Berliner, D. C. (1989). The place of process-product research in developing the agenda for research on teacher thinking. In J. Lowyck & C. Clark (Eds.), Teacher thinking and professional action (pp. 3–21). Belgium: Leuven University Press.
4.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.328–375). New York: Macmillan.
5.
Carnine, D. (1990). Reforming mathematics instruction—The role of curriculum materials. Direct Instruction News, 10(1), 5–16.
6.
Carnine, D. (1992). The missing link in improving schools—Reforming educational leaders. Direct Instruction News, 11(3), 25–35.
7.
Carnine, D. W., & Kameenui, E. J. (1990). The general education initiative and children with special needs: A false dilemma in the face of true problems. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 141–144, 148.
8.
Cawley, J. F. (1989, June). Qualitative enhancement of mathematics performance among the mildly handicapped. Presentation at the ICSEMM Instructional Methods Forum, Washington, DC.
9.
Christenson, S. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Thurlow, M. L. (1989). Critical instructional factors for students with mild handicaps: An integrative review. Remedial and Special Education, 10(5), 21–31.
10.
Deshler, D. D., & Lenz, B. K. (1989). The strategies instructional approach. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 36, 203–224.
11.
Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1988). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn. In J. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. J. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
12.
Engelmann, S., Carnine, D., & Steely, D. G. (1991). Making connections in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 292–303.
13.
Fleischner, J. E., Nuzum, M. B., & Marzola, E. S. (1987). Devising an instructional program to teach arithmetic problem-solving skills to students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 214–217.
14.
Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & Woodward, J. (1987). Direct instruction research: The third decade. Remedial and Special Education, 8(6), 48–56.
15.
Gersten, R., & Keating, T. (1987). Long-term benefits from direct instruction. Educational Leadership, 44(6), 28–31.
16.
Larrivee, B. (1986). Effective teaching for mainstreamed students is effective teaching for all students. Teacher Education and Special Education, 9, 173–179.
17.
Lenz, B. K. (1992). Cognitive approaches to teaching. In C. D. Mercer (Ed.), Students with learning disabilities (4th ed.269–309). New York: Merrill/Macmillan.
18.
Mercer, C. D., & Mercer, A. R. (1993). Teaching students with learning problems (4th ed.). New York: Merrill/Macmillan.
19.
Mercer, C. D., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19–35, 61.
20.
Montague, M., & Bos, C. S. (1986). The effect of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 26–33.
21.
Myers, P. I., & Hammill, D. D. (1990). Learning disabilities: Basic concepts, assessment practices, and instructional strategies (4th ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
22.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23.
Research Advisory Committee of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1988). NCTM curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics: Responses from the research community. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 338–344.
24.
Rieth, H., & Evertson, C. (1988). Variables related to the effective instruction of difficult-to-teach children. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(5). 1–8.
25.
Silbert, J., & Carnine, D. (1990). The mathematics curriculum—Standards, textbooks, and pedagogy: A case study of fifth grade division. Direct Instruction News, 10(1), 39–47.
26.
Slavin, R. E., & Madden, N. A. (1989). What works for students at risk: A research synthesis. Educational Leadership, 46(5), 4–13.
27.
Souviney, R. J. (1989). Learning to teach mathematics. New York: Merrill/Macmillan.
28.
Sprick, R. S. (1987). Solutions to elementary discipline problems [Audiocassette tapes]. Eugene, OR: Teaching Strategies.
29.
Stevens, R., & Rosenshine, B. (1981). Advances in research on teaching. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2(1), 1–9.
30.
Swanson, H. L. (1987). Information processing theory and learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 3–7.
31.
Tarver, S. G. (1986). Cognitive behavior modification, direct instruction and holistic approaches to the education of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 368–375.