Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E.H., Scott, J.A., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading. Urbana: University of Illinois.
3.
Anderson, R.C., Osborn, J., & Tierney, R.J. (Eds.). (1984). Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Brophy, J.E., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), The third handbook of research on teaching (pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.
5.
Chall, J.S. (1989). Learning to read: The great debate 20 years later—a response to “Debunking the Great Phonics Myth.”Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 521–538.
6.
Collins, A., Brown, J.S., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching students the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L.B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Duffy, G.G., Roehler, L.R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M., Vavrus, L., Wessellman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). The effects of explaining the reasoning associated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347–368.
8.
Durkin, D. (1984). Do basal manuals teach reading comprehension? In R.C. Anderson, J. Osborn, & J. Tierney (Eds.), Learning to read in American schools: Basal readers and content texts (pp. 29–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
Fisher, C.W., & Hiebert, E.H. (1990). Characteristics of tasks in two approaches to literacy instruction. Elementary School Journal, 91(1), 3–18.
10.
Gersten, R., & Carnine, D. (1986). Direct instruction in reading comprehension. Educational Leadership, 43(7), 70–78.
11.
Jones, B.F. (1986). Addressing quality and equality through cognitive instruction. Educational Leadership, 43, 4–12.
12.
Jones, B.F. (1990, April) Cognitive designs in education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
13.
Jones, B.F., & Idol, L. (1990). Conclusions. In B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 511–532). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
Jones, B.F., Palincsar, A.S., Ogle, D.S., & Carr, E.G. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
15.
Lindsey, M. (1990, April). Case studies of the experiences of three low achieving first graders in an integrated literacy curriculum. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Miami.
16.
Neisser, U. (Ed.), (1986). The academic performance of minority children: New perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Palincsar, A.S. (1986). The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction. Educational Psychologist, 21 (1 & 2), 73–98.
18.
Paris, S.G., & Winograd, C.P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In. B.F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pearson, P.D. (1989). Reading the whole-language movement. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 231–241.
21.
Pearson, P.D., & Dole, J.A. (1987). Explicit comprehension instruction: A review of research and a new conceptualization of instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 88(2), 151–165.
22.
Reyes, M. de la Luz. (in press). A process approach to literacy using dialogue journals and literature logs with second language learners. Research in the Teaching of English.
23.
Rosenshine, B. (1991, April). The use of scaffolds for teaching higher-level cognitive strategies. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
24.
Stahl, S.L., & Miller, P.D. (1989). Whole language and language experience approaches for beginning reading: A quantitative research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 87–116.
25.
Weinstein, C.E., Goetz, E., & Alexander, P. (1988). Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. New York: Academic Press.