Cook-Gumpertz, J. (1986). The social construction of literacy. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
2.
Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
DuCharme, C., Earl, J., & Poplin, M.S. (1989). The author model: The constructivist view of the writing process. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 237–242.
4.
Edelsky, C. (1990). Whose agenda is this anyway? A response to McKenna, Robinson, and Miller. Educational Researcher, 19(8), 7–11.
5.
Englert, C.S., & Palincsar, A.S. (1991). Reconsidering instructional research in literacy from a socio-cultural perspective. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 6, 225–230.
6.
Fisher, R.I. (1985). Visual and motor preferences may determine reading approach. Journal of Human Behavior and Learning, 2(1), 13–18.
7.
Foorman, B.R., & Liberman, D. (1989). Visual and phonological processing of words: A comparison of good and poor learners. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 349–355.
8.
Groff, P. (1977). The new anti-phonics. Elementary School Journal, 77, 323–332.
9.
Klenk, L. (in press). Case study in reading disability: An emergent literacy perspective. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
10.
Mason, J.M., & Allen, J. (1986). A review of emergent literacy with implications for research and practice in reading. In E.Z. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 13, pp. 27–43). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
11.
Palincsar, A.S., & Klenk, L. (in press). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
12.
Palincsar, A.S., Klenk, L., Anderman, E., Hric, K., & Wilson, A. (1991, December). Fostering intentionality in writing through alternative discourse practices with students identified as learning disabled. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Palm Springs, CA.
13.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Strickland, D.S. (1990). Emergent literacy: How young children learn to read and write. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 18–23.
15.
Sulzby, E. (1986). Writing and reading: Signs of oral and written language organization in the young child. In W.H. Teale & E. Sulzby (Eds.), Emergent literacy: Understanding reading and writing (pp. 50–89). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
Teale, W.H. (1987). Emergent literacy: Reading and writing development in early childhood. In J.E. Readence & R.S. Baldwin (Eds), Thirty-sixth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 45–74). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
17.
Teale, W.H. & Sulzby, E. (Eds). (1986). Emergent literacy: Understanding reading and writing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
18.
Tharpe, R., & Gallimore, R. (1989). Rousing minds to life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Turner, J. (1991, December). The influence of classroom context on first graders' motivation for literacy. Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, Palm Springs, CA.
20.
Velluntino, F.R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 437–443.
21.
Velluntino, F.R., & Scanlon, D.M. (1986). Experimental evidence for the effects of instructional bias on word identification. Exceptional Children, 53, 145–155.
22.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
Wells, G. (1990). Talk about text: Where literacy is learned and taught. Curriculum Inquiry, 21, 369–405.