Idol, L., Jones, B.F., & Mayer, R.E. (1991). Classroom instruction: The teaching of thinking. In L. Idol & B.F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 65–119). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Livingstone, I.D. (1985). Perceptions of the intended and implemented mathematics curriculum. A report of the Second International Mathematics Study, prepared by the members of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement for the U.S. Department of Education, Center for Statistics, Washington, DC.
3.
McKnight, C.C., Crosswaite, F.J., Dossey, J.A., Kifer, E., Swafford, J.O., Travers, K.J., & Cooney, T.J. (1987). The underachieving curriculum: Assessing U.S. school mathematics from an international perspective.Champaign, IL: Stipes.
4.
Miller, D., & Linn, R.L. (1986). Cross national achievement with differential retention rates. Unpublished contractor report to the U.S. Department of Education, Center for Statistics, Washington, DC.
5.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1980). Mathematical technical reports: Summary volume. U.S. Department of Education, Center for Statistics, Washington, DC.
6.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
7.
Romberg, T.A., & Stewart, D.M. (1987). The monitoring of school mathematics: Background papers (3 vols.). Madison: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
8.
Secada, W. (1991). Student diversity and mathematics education reform. In L. Idol & B.F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 297–332). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
