This study provides descriptive data regarding the prevalence of seven professional practices believed to interfere with the integrated delivery of related services for students with handicapping conditions in public schools. Based on questionnaire responses from 585 educators, parents, and related service personnel (e.g., speech/language pathologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists) from across the United States, these data highlight foundational issues that have an impact on the integrated delivery of related services that are necessary for some students to benefit from special education. Professional practices are presented that are believed to facilitate the integrated delivery of related services, as well as those believed to interfere with it. Results of the study document the prevalence of the interfering practices as reported by study participants, and also the extent to which parents and general education teachers report a lack of critical information about the provision of related services. Implications are discussed that pertain to personnel preparation, supervision of staff, advocacy, and collaborative teamwork.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albano, M. (1983). Transdisciplinary teaming in special education: A case study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(66). (University Microfilms Order No. DA8324500)
2.
American Occupational Therapy Association. (1989). Guidelines for occupational therapy services in school systems (2nd ed.). Rockville, MD: Author.
3.
American Physical Therapy Association. (1990). Physical therapy practice in educational environments: Policies and guidelines. Alexandria, VA: Author.
4.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 102 S. Ct. 3034 (1982).
5.
Bray, N.M., Coleman, J.M., & Gotts, E.A. (1981). The interdisciplinary team: Challenges to effective functioning. Teacher Education and Special Education, 4, 44–49.
6.
Campbell, P.H. (1987). The integrated programming team: An approach for coordinating professionals of various disciplines in programs for students with severe and multiple handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12(2), 107–116.
7.
Campbell, P.H., McInerney, W.F., & Cooper, M.A. (1984). Therapeutic programming for students with severe handicaps. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 38(9), 594–602.
8.
Code of Federal Regulations. (July 1987). Education. Washington, DC: Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Service, 34 § 300--399.
9.
Department of Education, State of Hawaii v. Katherine D, 727 F.2d 809 (1983).
10.
Dunn, W. (1988). Models of occupational therapy service provision in the school system. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 42(11), 718–723.
11.
Dunn, W. (1991a). Integrated related services. In L. Meyer, C. Peck, & L. Brown (Eds.), Critical issues in the lives of people with severe disabilities (pp. 353–377). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
12.
Dunn, W. (1991b). Pediatric occupational therapy: Facilitating effective service provision. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK.
13.
Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975. § 611, 20 U.S.C §§ 1401--1485.
14.
Espino v. Besteiro, 520 F. Supp. 905 (1981).
15.
Fenton, K.S., Yoshida, R.K., Maxwell, J.P., & Kaufman, M.J. (1979). Recognition of team goals: An essential step toward rational decision making. Exceptional Children, 45, 638–644.
16.
Giangreco, M.F. (1986a). Delivery of therapeutic services in special education programs for learners with severe handicaps. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 6(2), 5–15.
17.
Giangreco, M.F. (1986b). Effects of integrated therapy: A pilot study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11(3), 205–208.
18.
Giangreco, M.F. (1989). Making related service decisions for students with severe handicaps in public schools: Roles, criteria, and authority. Dissertation Abstracts International, 50(6A), 1624A. (University Microfilms No. DA8919516)
19.
Giangreco, M.F. (1990). Making related service decisions for students with severe disabilities: Roles, criteria, and authority. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 15(1), 22–31.
20.
Giangreco, M.F., & Eichinger, J. (1990). Related services and the transdisciplinary approach: A parent/professional training module. In M. Anketell, E.J. Bailey, J. Houghton, A. O'Dea, B. Utley, & D. Wickham (Eds), A series of training modules for educating children and youth with dual sensory and multiple impairments (pp. 1–71). Monmouth, OR: Teaching Research Publications.
21.
Giangreco, M.F., York, J., & Rainforth, B. (1989). Providing related services to learners with severe handicaps in educational settings: Pursuing the least restrictive option. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 1(2), 55–63.
22.
Glasnapp, D., & Foggio, J. (1985). Essentials of statistical analysis for the behavioral sciences. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
23.
Howell, D. (1987). Statistical methods for psychology (2nd ed.). Boston: PWS-Kent.
24.
Hurry v. Jones, 560 F. Supp. 500 (1983).
25.
Hutchinson, D.J. (1978). The transdisciplinary approach. In J.B. Curry & K.K. Peppe (Eds), Mental retardation: Nursing approaches to care (pp. 65–74). St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby.
26.
Hylton, J., Reed, P., Hall, S., & Cicirello, N. (1987). The role of the physical and occupational therapist in the school setting (TIES: Therapy in educational settings). Roseburg: Oregon Department of Education, Regional Services for Students with Orthopedic Impairment.
27.
Hymes v. Harnett County Board of Education, 664 F.2d 410 (4th Cir. 1981).
28.
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro, 104 S. Ct. 3371 (1984).
29.
Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, F.P. (1987). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
30.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Holubec, E. (1986). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom (rev. ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
31.
Lehr, D., & Haubrich, P. (1986). Legal precedents for students with severe handicaps. Exceptional Children, 52, 358–365.
32.
Lehr, D., & Noonan, M.J. (1989). Issues in the education of students with complex health care needs. In F. Brown & D. Lehr (Eds.), Persons with profound disabilities: Issues and practices (pp. 139–160). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
33.
Lowe, J., & Herranen, M. (1982). Understanding teamwork: Another look at the concepts. Social Work in Health Care, 7(2), 1–11.
34.
Martin, K.D. (1988). Physical therapists in educational environments: Focus on educational significance. Totline (Pediatric Section of APTA), 14(2), 4.
35.
McCormick, L.P., & Goldman, R. (1979). The transdisciplinary model: Implications for service delivery and personnel preparation for the severely and profoundly handicapped. AAESPH Review, 4, 152–161.
36.
McEwen, I.R., & Karlan, G.R. (1989). Assessment of effects of position on communication board access by individuals with cerebral palsy. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 5, 235–242.
37.
Meyer, L.H., Eichinger, J., & Park-Lee, S. (1987). A validation of program quality indicators in educational services for students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 11(1), 61–67.
38.
Orelove, F., & Sobsey, R. (1987). Transdisciplinary approach to educating children with multiple handicaps. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
39.
Osborne, A.G., Jr. (1984). How the courts have interpreted the related services mandate. Exceptional Children, 51, 249–252.
40.
Pfeiffer, S.I. (1982). The superiority of team decision making. Exceptional Children, 49, 68–69.
41.
Rainforth, B., & York, J. (1987). Integrating related services in community instruction. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 12(3), 190–198.
42.
Rainforth, B., & York, J. (in press). Integrated therapy: Strategies for teams serving learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
43.
Roberts, P. (1990, June). Key factors associated with integrated related services. Paper presented at Fusing Educational and Related Service for Student Success, a conference sponsored by the Task Force on Occupational and Physical Therapy in Vermont Schools, Killington, VT.
44.
SAS Institute. (1985). SAS user's guide: Statistics, Version 5 edition. Cary, NC: Author.
45.
Sears, C. (1981). The transdisciplinary approach: A process of compliance with Public Law 94--142. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6, 22–29.
46.
Sternat, J., Messina, R., Nietupski, J., Lyon, S., & Brown, L. (1977). Occupational and physical therapy services for severely handicapped students: Toward a naturalized public school service delivery model. In E. Sontag, J. Smith, & N. Certo (Eds), Educational programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped (pp. 263–278). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, Division of Mental Retardation.
47.
Strawbridge, L.A., Drnach, M., Sisson, L.A., & Van Hasselt, V.B. (1987, October). Application of behavior therapy to promote use of a walker by a child with multiple handicaps. Paper presented at the annual conference of The Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, Chicago.
48.
Tokarcik v. Forest Hills School District, 665 F.2d 443 (3d cir. 1981).
49.
Vitello, S.J. (1986). The Tatro case: Who gets what and why. Exceptional Children, 52, 353–356.
50.
Williams, W., & Fox, T. (1990). Selected best practices for meeting the educational needs of all students in their local school and community. Burlington: University of Vermont, Center for Developmental Disabilities.
51.
York, J., Rainforth, B., & Giangreco, M.F. (1990). Transdisciplinary teamwork and integrated therapy: Clarifying some misconceptions. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 2(2), 73–79.
