This article develops two mainstream education perspectives on the Regular Education Initiative (REI). The first perspective draws on 20 years of research and practice about school improvement and the implementation of innovations. Nine understandings about school improvement are documented and discussed. The second perspective is grounded in the current movement to restructure schools. Similarities between the restructuring movement and the REI are discussed. In the final section, the author argues for the development of a partnership between classroom teachers and special education aimed at a fundamental rethinking and redesign of the organization of schools and the way in which teaching and learning occur.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. (1978). Federal programs supporting educational change.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
2.
Charter, W.W. (1973). Measuring the implementation of differentiated staffing.Eugene, OR: Center for Advanced Study of Educational Administration.
3.
Cohen, D.K. (1988). Teaching practice: Plus ca change….East Lansing, MI: The National Center for Research on Teacher Education.
4.
Crandall, D.P. (1982). People, policies, and practices.Andover, MA: Network.
5.
Daft, R., & Becker, S. (1978). The innovative organization.New York: Elsevier.
6.
Deal, T. (1986). Educational change: Revival tent, tinkertoys, jungle, or carnival? In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Rethinking school improvement: Research, craft, and concept (pp. 115–128). New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
Elkind, D. (1989). Developmentally appropriate practice: Philosophical and practical implications. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(2), 113–117.
8.
Goodlad, J. (1975). Dynamics of educational change.New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Goodlad, J. (1981). A place called school.New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hall, G., & Loucks, S. (1979). Teacher concerns as a basis for facilitating and personalizing staff development. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff development: New demands, new realities, new perspectives (pp. 36–53). New York: Teachers College Press.
12.
Huberman, A., & Miles, M. (1982). Innovation up close: A field study in twelve school settings.Andover, MA: Network.
13.
Little, J.W. (1981). School success and staff development: The role of staff development in urban desegregated schools.Boulder: Colorado Center for Action Research.
14.
Little, J.W. (1986). Seductive images and organizational realities in professional development. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Rethinking school improvement: Research, craft, and concept (pp. 26–44). New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
McLaughlin, M., & Yee, S. (1988). School as a place to have a career. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 23–44). New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
Miller, L., & Lieberman, A. (1988). School improvement in the United States: Nuance and numbers. Qualitative Studies in Education, 1(1), 3–19.
17.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk.Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
18.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
Popowitz, T., Tabachnick, B., & Wehlage, G. (1982). The myth of educational reform.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
20.
Reynolds, M.C., Wang, M.C., & Walberg, H. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 89, 421–439.
21.
Rosenholtz, S. (1989). Teachers' workplace.New York: Longman.
22.
Sarason, S. (1966). Psychology in community settings: Clinical, educational, vocational, social aspects.New York: Wiley.
23.
Sarason, S. (1982). The culture of the school and the problem of change.Boston: Allyn & Bacon. (Originally published 1971)
24.
Schlechty, P.C. (1988). Leading cultural change: The CMS study. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 185–221). New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
Showers, B., Joyce, B., & Bennett, B. (1987). Synthesis of research on staff development: A framework for future study and a state-of-the-art analysis. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 77–87.
26.
Sizer, T.R. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
27.
Smith, L., & Keith, P. (1971). Anatomy of educational innovation.New York: Wiley.
28.
Smith, L., Klein, P., Prunty, J., & Dwyer, D. (1986). Educational innovators: Then and now.New York: Palmer Press.
29.
Sussman, L. (1977). Tales out of school.Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
Wolcott, H. (1977). Teachers vs. technocrats.Eugene, OR: Center for Educational Policy and Management.
