This paper describes a multiple gating screening procedure for the identification of elementary-aged pupils who are at risk for serious behavior disorders. This procedure, entitled Systematic Screening for Behavior Disorders (SSBD), consists of three interrelated assessment stages with teacher judgment as the primary information source in screening Stages 1 and 2 and direct behavioral observations as the primary source in Stage 3. The SSBD is designed to improve the quality of referrals to multidisciplinary teams and to provide each pupil in regular classroom settings with an equal chance to be identified for both externalizing and internalizing behavior problems. The paper reviews some of the myriad problems associated with the definition, classification, assessment, and referral of pupils with behavior disorders. A rationale for the SSBD is presented; its operation is described and initial research conducted in its development and trial testing is presented and discussed. A year-long, formal test of the SSBD within an elementary school is also described. Results of this study indicated that the SSBD correctly classified 89.47% of pupils who had been identified as externalizers, internalizers, or normals by their respective teachers in screening Stage 1. The psychometric characteristics of the instruments in SSBD Stages 1, 2, and 3 are judged acceptable by the authors for their intended assessment purposes. Practical implications and uses of the SSBD are discussed, as is future planned research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T. (1978). Psychopathology of childhood: Research problems and issues. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(4), 759-776.
2.
Achenbach, T. & Edelbrock, C. (1979). The child behavior profile: II. Boys aged 12-16 and girls aged 6-11 and 12-16. Jounal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 223-233.
3.
Brophy, J.Evertson, C. (1981). Student characteristics and teachingNew York: Longman.
4.
Forness, S., & Kavale, K. (1985). Psychologizing special education: Who needs it?Keynote address, Behavior Disorders Conference, Arizona State University, Phoenix.
5.
Gerber, M. & Semmel, M. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19(3), 137-148.
6.
Greenwood, C.Walker, H.M., Todd, N., & Hops, H. (1979). SAMPLE (Social assessment manual for preschool level). Available from the Center at Oregon for Research in the Behavioral Education of the Handicapped (CORBEH), Center on Human Development, Clinical Services Bldg., University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.
7.
Gresham, F.M. (1985). Behavior disorder assessment: Conceptual, definitional, and practical considerations. School Psychology Review, 14, 495-509.
8.
Gresham, F.M. (1986). Conceptual issues in the assessment of social competence in children. In P. Strain, M. Guralnick., & H. M. Walker, (Eds.), Children's social behavior (pp. 143-179). New York: Academic Press.
9.
Hersh, R. & Walker, H.M. (1983). Great expectations: Making schools effective for all children. Policy Studies Review, 2(1), 147-188.
10.
Hops, H.Finch, M., & McConnell, S. (1985). Social skills deficits. In P. Bornstein & A. Kazdin (Eds.), Handbook of clinical behavior therapy with children (pp. 543-598). Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.
11.
Horn, W. & Packard, T. (1985). Early identification of learning problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(5), 597-607.
12.
Huntze, S. (1985). Statement to support replacing the term seriously emotionally disturbed with the term behaviorally disordered as a descriptor for children and youth who are handicapped by their behavior [Position paper]. Columbia, MO: Council for Children with Behavior Disorders.
13.
Jenson, W. (1984). Severely emotionally disturbed versus behavior disorders: Consideration of a label change.Salt Lake City, University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.
14.
Kauffman, J. (1982). Social policy issues in special education and related services for emotionally disturbed children and youth. In M. Noel & N. Haring (Eds.), Progress or change: Issues in educating the emotionally disturbed (pp. 1-10). Seattle: University of Washington.
15.
Kauffman, J. (1985). Characteristics of children's behavior disorders (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
16.
Kazdin, A. & Frame, C. (1983). Aggressive behavior and conduct disorder. In M. Richards & T. Kratochwill (Eds.), The practice of child therapy (pp. 167-192). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
17.
Loeber, R.Dishion, T., & Patterson, G. (1984). Multiple gating: A multistage assessment procedure for identifying youths at risk for deliquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Deliquency, 21(1), 7-32.
18.
Robbins, L. (1966). Deviant children grown upBaltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
19.
Ross, A. (1980). Psychological disorders of children: A behavioral approach to theory, research, and therapy (2nd ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Schaefer, E. (1982). Development of adaptive behavior: Conceptual models and family correlates. In M. Begab, H. Barber., & H. C. Haywood, (Eds.), Prevention of retarded development in psychosocially disadvantaged children.Baltimore: University Park Press.
21.
Stumme, V.Gresham, F., & Scott, N. (1982). Validity of social behavior assessment in discriminating emotionally disabled from nonhandicapped students. Journal of Behavioral Assessment, 4(4), 327-341.
22.
Walker, H. (1982). Assessment of behavioral disorders in the school setting: Issues, problems and strategies. In N. Haring & M. Noel (Eds.), Progress or change: Issues in educating the emotionally disturbed (Vol. 1, pp. 11-42). Seattle: University of Washington.
23.
Walker, H.M. (1986). The assessments for integration into mainstream settings (AIMS) assessment system: Rationale, instruments, procedures, and outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 15(1), 55-63.
24.
Walker, H. & Fabre, T. (1987). Assessment of behavioral disorders in the school setting: Issues, problems and strategies revisited. In N. Haring (Ed.), Measuring and managing behavior disorders (pp. 198-243). Seattle: University of Washington Press.
25.
Walker, H.M., Hops, H., & Greenwood, C.R. (1984). The CORBEH research and development model: Programmatic issues and strategies. In S. Paine, G. T. Bellamy, & B. Wilcox (Eds.), Human services that work (pp. 57-78). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
26.
Walker, H.M., McConnell, S., & Clarke, J. (1984). Social skills training in school settings: A model for the social integration of handicapped children into less restrictive settings. In R. J. McMahon & R. D. Peters, (Eds.), Child disorders: Behavioral-developmental approaches (pp. 140-168). New York: Brunner/ Mazel.
27.
Walker, H.M., & Rankin, R. (1983). Assessing the behavioral expectations and demands of less restrictive settings. School Psychology Review, 12, 274-284.
28.
Walker, H.M., Reavis, H.K., Rhode, G., & Jenson, W.R. (1985). A conceptual model for delivery of behavioral services to behavior disordered children in educational settings. In P. Bornstein & A. Kazdin (Eds.), Handbook of clinical behavioral services with children (pp. 700-741). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
29.
Walker, H.M., Severson, H., & Haring, N. (1985). Standardized screening and identification of behavior disordered pupils in the elementary age range: Rationale, procedures and guidelines.Available from Hill Walker or Herb Severson, Oregon Research Institute, 149 W. 12th Avenue, Eugene, OR 97401.
30.
Walker, H.M., Shinn, M.R., O'Neill, R.E., & Ramsey, E. (1987). A longitudinal assessment of the development of antisocial behavior in boys: Rationale, methodology, and first year results. Remedial and Special Education, 8(4), 7-16.
31.
Wood, F.Smith, C., & Grimes, J. (Eds.). (1985). The Iowa assessment model in behavioral disorders: A training manualDes Moines: State of Iowa, Department of Public Instruction.
