This article describes procedures recently employed for the quantitative synthesis of single-subject research literature in special education. First, the need for objective, systematic review procedures is discussed. Second, previous approaches for quantitative evaluation of outcomes of single-case research designs are reviewed. Third, procedures employed by the present authors are outlined using examples from recent synthesis efforts. Finally, implications for future reviews of single-subject research are described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Box, G.E.P., & Jenkins, G.M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
2.
Carlberg, C.G., Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R., Maruyama, G., Kavale, K., Kulik, C., Kulik, J.A., Lysakowski, R.S., Pflaum, S.W., & Walberg, H.J. (1984). Meta-analysis in education: A reply to Slavin. Educational Researcher, 13, 16–23.
3.
Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A metaanalysis. Journal of Special Education, 14, 295–309.
4.
Casto, G., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1986). The efficacy of early intervention programs for handicapped children: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 52, 417–424.
5.
Center, B.A., Skiba, R.J., & Casey, A. (1985--1986). A methodology for the quantitative synthesis of intra-subject design research. Journal of Special Education, 19, 387–400.
6.
Cook, T.D., & Leviton, L.C. (1980). Reviewing the literature: A comparison of traditional methods with meta-analysis. Journal of Personality, 4, 449–472.
7.
Cook, S., Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Casto, G. (1985--1986). Handicapped students as tutors. Journal of Special Education, 19, 483–492.
8.
DeProspero, A., & Cohen, S. (1979). Inconsistent visual analysis of variance model for the intrasubject replicationdesign. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 563–570.
9.
Gentile, J.R., Roden, A.H., & Klein, R.D. (1974). An analysis of variance model for the intrasubject replicationdesign. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 193–198.
10.
Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3–8.
11.
Glass, G.V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351–379.
12.
Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Gottman, J.M., & Glass, G.V. (1978). Analysis of time-series experiments. In T.R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Single subject research-Strategies for evaluation change (pp. 197–235). New York: Academic Press.
Huitema, B.E. (1985). Auto-correlation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 109–120.
16.
Jackson, G.B. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 50, 438–460.
17.
Jones, R.R., Weinrott, M.R., & Vaught, R.S. (1978). Effects of serial dependency on the agreeement between visual and statistical inference. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 272–282.
18.
Kavale, K.A. (1980). Auditory-visual integration and its relationship to reading achievement: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 947–955.
19.
Kavale, K.A. (1981). The relationship between auditory perceptual skills and reading ability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 539–546.
20.
Kavale, K.A. (1982). The efficacy of stimulant drug treatment for hyperactivity: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 280–289.
21.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1983). Hyperactivity and diet treatment: A meta-analysis of the Feingold hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 324–330.
22.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1984). A meta-analysis assessing the validity of Wechsler Scale profiles and recategorizations: Patterns or parodies?Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 136–156.
23.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1985). The science of learning disabilities. San Diego: College-Hill.
24.
Kavale, K.A., & Nye, C. (1985--1986). Parameters of learning disabilities in achievement linguistics of neuropsychological and social/behavioral domains. Journal of Special Education, 19, 443–458.
25.
Kazdin, A.E. (1976). Statistical analysis for single-case experimental designs. In M. Hersen & D.H. BarlowSingle-case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (pp. 265–316). New York: Pergamon Press.
26.
Kazdin, A.E. (1978). Methodological and interpretive problems of single-case experimental designs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 629–642.
27.
Levin, J.R., Marascuilo, L., & Hubert, L.J. (1978). N = non-parametric randomization tests. In T.R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Single-subject research: Strategies for evaluating change (pp. 167–196). New York: Academic Press.
28.
Light, R.J., & Smith, P.V. (1971). Accumulating evidence: Procedures for resolving contradictions among different studies. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 429–471.
29.
Mastropieri, M.A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1985--1986). Early intervention for socially withdrawn children. Journal of Special Education, 19, 429–441.
30.
Mastropieri, M.A., Scruggs, T.E., & Casto, G. (1985). Early intervention for behaviorally disordered children: An integrative review. Monographs in Behavior Disorders, 8, 86–104.
31.
McCain, L.J., & McCleary, R. (1979). The statistical analysis of the simple interrupted time-series quasi-experiment. In T.D. Cook & D.T. Campbell (Eds.), Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
32.
Parsonson, B.S., & Baer, D.M. (1978). The analysis and presentation of graphic data. In T.R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change (pp. 101–166). New York: Academic Press.
33.
Pillemer, D.B., & Light, R.J. (1980). Synthesizing outcomes: How to use research evidence from many studies. Harvard Educational Review, 50, 176–195.
34.
Revsky, S.H. (1967). Some statistical treatments compatible with individual organism methodology. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 10, 319–330.
35.
Rosenthal, R. (1978). Combining results of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 185–193.
36.
Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Rutherford, R.B., & Nelson, C.M. (1982). Analysis of the response contingent time-out literature with behaviorally disor-. dered students in classroom settings. Monographs in Behavior Disorders, 5, 79–105.
38.
Rutherford, R.B., Jr., & Nelson, C.M. (in press). Applied behavior analysis in education: Generalization and maintenance. In J.C. Witt, S.N. Eliott, & F.M. Greshman (Eds.), Handbook of behavior therapy in education. New York: Plenum.
39.
Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., & Casto, G. (in press). Early intervention for behaviorally disordered children: The synthesis of single-subject research. Monographs in Behavior Disorders.
40.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1986). Preschool language interventions: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Department of Education.
41.
Scruggs, T.E., Mastropieri, M.A., Cook, S.B., & Escobar, C. (1986). Early intervention for children with conduct disorders: A quantitative synthesis of single-subject research. Behavioral Disorders, 11, 260–271.
42.
Scruggs, T.E., White, K.R., & Bennion, K. (in press). Improving achievement test scores in the elementary grades by coaching: A meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal.
43.
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44.
Sindelar, P.T., & Wilson, R.J. (1984). The potential effects of meta-analysis on special education practice. Journal of Special Education, 18, 81–92.
45.
Skiba, R.J., Casey, A., & Center, B.A. (1985--1986). Nonaversive procedures in the treatment of classroom behavior problems. Journal of Special Education, 19, 459–481.
46.
Slavin, R.E. (1984). Meta-analysis in education: How has it been used?Educational Researcher, 13(8), 6–15.
47.
Tawney, J.W., & Gast, D.L. (1984). Single-subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
