In his thoughtful article on special education research, Iano (1986) has made several important points. While there is much to agree with in his criticism of scientific inquiry in our field, some points deserve further elaboration; and certain of Iano's solutions may be somewhat premature. This response focuses on theory development and alternatives to current research strategies in special education, along with related improvements in professional status and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bolles, R.C. (1962). The difference between statistical hypotheses and scientific hypotheses. Psychological Reports, 11, 639–645.
2.
Brandt, R.M. (1975). An historical overview of systematic approaches to observation in school settings. In R. Weinberg & F. Wood (Eds), Observation of pupils and teachers in mainstream and special education settings: Alternative strategies. University of Minnesota: Leadership Training Institute in Special Education.
3.
Cohen, M.W. (1986). Intrinsic motivation in the special education classroom. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 258–261.
Dewey, J. (1900). Psychology and social practice. The Psychological Review, 7, 105–124.
6.
Federal Register. (1984). Final regulations for training personnel for education of the handicapped, 49(134), 28370–28377.
7.
Forness, S.R. (1973). The reinforcement hierarchy. Psychology in the Schools, 10, 168–177.
8.
Forness, S.R. (1981). Concepts of learning and behavior disorders: Implications for research and practice. Exceptional Children, 48, 56–64.
9.
Forness, S.R., & Kavale, K.A. (1984). Education of the mentally retarded: A note on policy. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19, 239–245.
10.
Forness, S.R., & Kavale, K. (1986). Depsychologizing special education. Monographs in Behavioral Disorders, 9, 1–10.
11.
Forness, S.R., Sinclair, E., & Russell, A. (1984). Serving children with emotional or behavioral disorders: Implications for educational policy. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 54, 22–32.
12.
Galagan, J.E. (1985). Psychoeducational testing: Turn out the lights, the party's over. Exceptional Children, 52, 288–299.
13.
Gerber, M.M., & Semmel, M.I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137–148.
14.
Iano, R.P. (1986). The study and development of teaching: With implications for the advancement of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 7(5), 50–61.
15.
Kavale, K.A. (1983). Fragile findings, complex conclusions, and meta-analysis in special education. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4, 97–106.
16.
Kavale, K.A. (1984). Potential advantages of the meta-analysis technique for research in special education. Journal of Special Education, 18, 61–72.
17.
Kavale, K.A. (in press). Theoretical quandaries in learning disabilities. In S. Vaughn & C. Bos (Eds.), Issues in and directions for future research in learning disabilities. San Diego: College-Hill.
18.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1984). The historical foundation of learning disabilities: A quantitative synthesis assessing the validity of Strauss and Werner's exogenous versus endogenous distinction of mental retardation. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 18–24.
19.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1985a). The science of learning disabilities. San Diego: College-Hill Press.
20.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1985b). Learning disability and the history of science: Paradigm or paradox?Remedial and Special Education, 6, 12–23.
21.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1986a). School learning, time and learning disabilities: The disassociated learner. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 130–138.
22.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1986b). Theory construction in learning disabilities and the philosophy of science: A critical appraisal. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1986c). Auditory and visual perceptual abilities and their relationship to reading achievement: A meta-analysis. Education and Treatment of Children. Manuscript submitted for publication.
24.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (1986d). The far side of heterogeneity: A critical analysis of empirical subtyping research in learning disabilities. Manuscript submitted for publication.
25.
Kavale, K.A., & Forness, S.R. (in press). A matter of substance over style: A quantitative synthesis assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children.
26.
Kavale, K.A., & Glass, G.V. (1982). The efficacy of special education interventions and practices: A compendium of meta-analysis findings. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1–14.
27.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
MacMillan, D.L., & Meyers, C.E. (1984). Molecular research and molar learning. In P. Brooks, R. Sperber, & C. McCauley (Eds)., Learning and cognition in the mentally retarded (pp. 121–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
Mann, L., & Phillips, W.A. (1967). Fractional practices in special education: A critique. Exceptional Children, 33, 311–317.
30.
Meehl, P.E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.
31.
Merton, R.K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
32.
Merton, R.K. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33.
Palmer, D.J. (1983). An attributional perspective on labeling. Exceptional Children, 49, 423–429.
34.
Popper, K.R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1934)
35.
Pullis, M. (1985). LD students' temperament characteristics and their impact on decisions by resource and mainstream teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 109–122.
36.
Rescher, N. (1970). Scientific explanation. New York: Free Press.
37.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1984). Broadening the research perspective in special education. Exceptional Children, 50, 400–408.
38.
Summers, E.G. (1986). The information flood in learning disabilities: A bibliometric analysis of the journal literature. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 49–60.
39.
Toulmin, S. (1961). Foresight and understanding. New York: Harper & Row.
40.
Tucker, J.A. (1985). Curriculum-based assessment: An introduction. Exceptional Children, 52, 199–204.
41.
Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.
42.
Wiederholt, J.L. (1976). Learning disability research in special education. Journal of Special Education, 10, 127–128.
