The argument advanced by Richard Iano has the values of encouraging special educators to consider interactions among variables and to maintain a broad perspective on research. However, it is based on inaccurate premises and weak forms of argument. For these reasons, the argument fails to serve as a compelling call for abandoning experimental research methodology. At best, it should serve as a reminder of the importance of the benefits of pluralism in research methodology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Gage, N.L. (1985). Hard gains in the soft sciences: The case of pedagogy. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
2.
Iano, R. (1986). The study and development of teaching: With implications for the advancement of special education. Remedial and Special Education, 7(5), 50–61.
3.
Lovitt, T. (1978). Inspite of my resistance I've learned from children. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
4.
Lovitt, T. (1982). Because of my persistence I've learned from children. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
5.
Medley, D.M. (1972). Early history of research on teacher behavior. International Review of Education, 18, 430–439.
6.
Snell, M.E. (1985). Promoting skill generalization in students with severe handicaps. Special Education Today, 2(1), 16–17.
7.
Soltis, J., & Fenstermacher, G. (1986). Approaches to teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
Thomas, L. (1983). The youngest science: Notes of a medicine watcher. New York: Viking.
