Abstract
Eighty-five mildly handicapped (learning disabled or behaviorally disordered) students were assigned at random to either a control condition or a condition in which students received training for 5 days on test-taking skills relevant to the Stanford Achievement Test. Results of test scores indicated that trained students scored significantly higher on tests of reading decoding and math concepts. A significant univariate interaction between experimental group and handicapping condition suggested that students classified as behavioraily disordered had differentially benefited on the math concepts subtest. Finally, a descriptive but nonsignificant difference favoring trained students was found on the math computation subtest. Implications for special education are given.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
