The purpose of this paper is to review research on the use of formative evaluation with mildly handicapped pupils. First, the importance of formative evaluation to special education is described. Then, four critical issues in formative evaluation methodology are discussed: focus of measurement, frequency of measurement, data display, and data-utilization methods. Finally, a proposal for additional related research is advanced.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson-Inman, L., Walker, H., & Purcell, J. (1984). Promoting the transfer of skills across settings: Transenvironmental programming for handicapped students in the mainstream. In W.L. Heward, T.E. Heron, D.S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 17–37). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
2.
Baldwin, V. (1976). Curriculum concerns. In M.A. Thomas (Ed.), Hey, don't forget about me (pp. 64–73). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
3.
Bowers, J.E. (1980). End-of-year evaluation report for the 1979-1980 Title I Neglected and Delinquent Program of the Minneapolis Public Schools. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from Educational Services Division, Minneapolis Public Schools, 807 N.E. Broadway, Minneapolis, MN 55413.)
4.
Brandstetter, G., & Merz, C. (1978). Charting scores in precision teaching for skill acquisition. Exceptional Children, 45, 42–48.
5.
Clifford, M.M. (1984). Thoughts on a theory of constructive failure. Educational Psychologist, 19, 108–120.
6.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.New York: Academic Press.
7.
Deno, S.L., Marston, D., & Mirkin, P.K. (1982). Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 48, 368–371.
8.
Deno, S.L., & Mirkin, P.K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual.Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
9.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36–45.
10.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., & Fuchs, L.S. (1982). Decision framework for developing measurement and evaluation systems. In P.K. Mirkin, L.S. Fuchs, & S.L. Deno (Eds.), Considerations for designing a continuous evaluation system: An integrative review (Monograph No. 20, pp. 17–29). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
11.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., Lowry, L., & Kuehnle, K. (1980). Relationships among simple measures of written expression and performance on standardized achievement tests (Research Report No. 22). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 197 508)
12.
Epstein, S. (1980). The stability of behavior, II: Implications for psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 790–806.
13.
Eubanks, E.E., & Levine, D.U. (1983). A first look at effective schools projects in New York City and Milwaukee. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 697–702.
14.
Fuchs, L.S. (1981). The concurrent validity of progress measures of basal reading material. Unpublished doctoral disscrtation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
15.
Fuchs, L.S. (1982). Reading. In P.K. Mirkin, L.S. Fuchs, & S.L. Deno (Eds.), Considerations for designing a continuous evaluation system: An integrative review (Monograph No. 20, pp. 29–74). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
16.
Fuchs, L.S., Deno, S.L., & Marston, D. (1983). Improving the reliability of curriculum-based measures of academic skills for psychoeducational decision making. Diagnostique, 8, 135–149.
17.
Fuchs, L.S., Deno, S.L., & Mirkin, P.K. (1982). The effect of continuous evaluation of student goals on teacher decisions (Research Report No. 97). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 226 043)
18.
Fuchs, L.S., Deno, S.L., & Mirkin, P.K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449–460.
19.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1984). Criterion-referenced assessment without measurement: How accurate for special education?Remedial and Special Education, 5, 29–32.
20.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1985). The relation between methods of graphing student performance data and student achievement. Unpublished manuscript. (Available from L.S. Fuchs, Box 328, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.)
21.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (in press-a). Linking assessment to instructional intervention: An overview. In L.S. Fuchs & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Linking assessment to instructional intervention: A special issue. School Psychology Review.
22.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (in press-b). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children.
23.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (in press-c). Curriculum-based assessment of progress toward long- and short-term goals. Journal of Special Education.
24.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Deno, S.L. (1985). The importance of goal ambitiousness and goal mastery to student achievement. Exceptional Children, 52, 63–71.
25.
Fuchs, L.S., Wesson, C., Tindal, G., Mirkin, P.K., & Deno, S.L. (1981). Teacher efficiency in continuous evaluation of IEP goals (Research Report No. 53). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 215 467)
26.
Fuchs, L.S., Wesson, C., Tindal, G., Mirkin, P.K., & Deno, S.L. (1982). Instructional changes, student performance, and teacher preferences: The effects of specific measurement and evaluation procedures (Research Report No. 64). Minneapolis: Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 218 849)
27.
Gersten, R., Carnine, D., & White, W.A.T. (1984). The pursuit of clarity: Direct instruction and applied behavior analysis. In W.L. Heward, T.E. Heron, D.S. Hill, & J. Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 38–57). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
28.
Glasser, W. (1969). Schools without failure.New York: Harper & Row.
29.
Goodman, L. (1985). The effective schools movement and special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 17, 102–105.
30.
Goodstein, H.A. (1982). The reliability of criterion-referenced tests and special education: Assumed versus demonstrated. Journal of Special Education, 16, 37–48.
31.
Haring, N.G., White, O.R., & Liberty, K.A. (1979). Field initiated research studies: An investigation of learning and instructional hierarchies in severely and profoundly handicapped children: Annual Report 1978–1979.Seattle: University of Washington, Child Development and Mental Retardation Center, Experimental Education Unit.
32.
Hasselbring, T.S. (1985). Toward the development of expert assessment systems. Working paper. (Available from T. Hasselbring, Box 328, Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.)
33.
Hasselbring, T.S., & Hamlett, C.L. (1983). AIMSTAR: A data management and decision-making system.Portland, OR: ASIEP Education Co.
34.
Hoffman, J.V., & Rutherford, W.L. (1984). Effective reading programs: A critical review of outlier studies. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 79–92.
35.
Lindsley, O. (1971). Precision teaching in perspective: An interview with Ogden R. Lindsley. Teaching Exceptional Children, 3 (3), 114–119.
36.
Lovitt, T.C. (1981). Notes on behavior modification. Journal of Special Education, 15, 395–400.
37.
Mann, L. (1984). On seeking a riskless education. Journal of Special Education, 18, 94–97.
38.
Marston, D. (in press). Measuring academic progress of students with learning difficulties: A comparison of the semi-logarithmic chart and equal interval graph paper. Exceptional Children.
39.
Marston, D., & Deno, S.L. (1981). The reliability of simple, direct measures of written expression (Research Report No. 50). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 212 663)
40.
Marston, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Deno, S.L. (1985). Measuring pupil progress: A comparison of standardized achievement tests and curriculum-based measures. Unpublished paper. (Available from D. Marston, 2752 41st Ave. S.E., Minneapolis, MN 55406.)
41.
Martin, M.A. (1980). A comparison of variations in data utilization procedures on the reading performance of mildly handicapped students. Unpublished doctoral disseration, University of Washington, Seattle.
42.
Mirkin, P.K., Deno, S.L., Fuchs, L.S., Wesson, C., Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Kuehnle, K. (1981). Procedures to develop and monitor progress on IEP goals.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
43.
Mirkin, P.K., Deno, S.L., Tindal, G., & Kuehnle, K. (1980). Formative evaluation: Continued development of data utilization systems (Research Report No. 23). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 197 510)
44.
Mirkin, P.K., Fuchs, L.S., & Deno, S.L. (Eds.). (1982). Considerations for designing a continuous evaluation system: An integrative review (Monograph No. 20). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
45.
Peterson, D.L., Albert, S.C., Foxworth, A.M., Cox, L.S., & Tilley, B.K. (1985). Effective schools for all students: Current efforts and directions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 17, 106–111.
46.
Rieth, H.J. (1982). Evaluating and providing feedback on the effectiveness of instruction for handicapped children integrated in inner-city secondary schools: Final Report, Grant No. NIE-G-80-0089. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped.
47.
Rieth, H.J., Polsgrove, L., & Semmel, M.I. (1981). Instructional variables that make a difference: Attention to task and beyond. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2(3), 61-72.
48.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1985). Assessment in special and remedial education (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
49.
Tawney, J.W., & Gast, D.L. (1984). Single subject research in special education.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
50.
Tindal, G., Shinn, M., Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Deno, S.L., & Germann, G. (1983). The technical adequacy of a basal reading series mastery test (Research Report No. 113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 236 191)
51.
Tindal, G., Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Shinn, M.R., Deno, S.L., & Germann, G. (1985). Empirical validation of criterion-referenced tests. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 203–209.
52.
Tindal, G., Fuchs, L.S., Mirkin, P.K., Christenson, S., & Deno, S.L. (1981). The relationship between student achievement and teacher assessment of short- or long-term goals (Research Report No. 61). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 218 846)
53.
White, O.R. (1971). A pragmatic approach to the description of progress in the single case. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
54.
White, O.R. (1974). Evaluating the educational process.Seattle: University of Washington, Child Development and Mental Retardation Center, Experimental Education Unit.
55.
White, O.R. (1984). Descriptive analysis of extant research literature concerning skill generalization and the severely/profoundly handicapped. In M. Boer (Ed.), Investigating the problem of skill generalization: Literature review (pp. 1–19). Seattle: University of Washington, Washington Research Organization.
