The authors reassert their position that the correlations between auditory skills and reading achievement scores found by Kavale, while statistically significant, are of limited pragmatic value to the field. They are of little use for screening or placement decisions. As Kavale admits, they offer no guidelines for selecting appropriate instructional methods. It remains unclear exactly how these correlations enhance our understanding of reading ability or reading instruction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GerstenR., & CarnineD. (1984). Auditory-perceptual skills and reading: A response to Kavale's meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 5(1), 16–19.
2.
HammillD. D., & McNuttG. (1981). The correlates of reading. Austin: PRO-ED.
3.
KavaleK. A. (1981a). Functions of the Illinois Test of Psycho-linguistic Abilities (ITPA): Are they trainable?Exceptional Children, 47(7), 496–510.
4.
KavaleK. A. (1981b). The relationship between auditory perceptual skills and reading ability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 539–546.
5.
KavaleK. A., & MattsonP. D. (1983). One jumped off the balance beam: A meta-analysis of perceptual-motor training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 16, 165–173.