Special-Class Placement,Level of Intelligence,and the Self-Concepts of Gifted Children: A Social Comparison Perspective

Abstract

Two hypotheses derived from social comparison tested the influence of instructional segregation on the self-concepts of elementary school gifted children. The self-concept scores of half the children were assessed prior to their participation in a one-day-per-week segregated enrichment program for the gifted. The remaining children were tested during program participation. The higher self-concept scores of students assessed prior to the program were interpreted as support for the contention that the reduced heterogeneity of ability in gifted classrooms forces some gifted children to see their abilities in a less favorable light. Each group was further divided by high and low IQ scores (a misnomer). The lowest self-concept scores accrued to low IQ children assessed during program participation. This was interpreted as support for the notion that transition to segregated classes for the gifted most dramatically affects the self-concepts of those children who are at the low end of the distribution of abilities within gifted classes. The self-concept scores of all groups of gifted children were generally robust, but the findings of this study underscore the important influence of children's social/instructional environments on self-concept.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Coleman

J. M.

(1983a). Self-concept and the mildly handicapped: The role of social comparisons. Journal of Special Education, 17(1), 37–45.

Coleman

J. M.

(1983b). Handicapped labels and instructional segregation: Influences on children's self-concepts versus the perceptions of others. Learning Disability Quarterly, 6, 3–11.

Coleman

J. M.

(1984). Mother's predictions of the self-concept of their normal or learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(4), 214–217.

Coleman

J. M.

, & Fults

B. A.

(1982). Self-concept and the gifted classroom: The role of social comparisons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 116–120.

Coleman

J. M.

, & Fults

B. A.

(1983). Self-concept and the gifted child. Roeper Review of Gifted Education, 5(4), 44–47.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparisons. Human Relations, 2, 117–140.

French

J. W.

, & Michael

W. B.

, (Eds.) (1966) Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Harter

(1983). Developmental perspectives on the self-system. In Hetherington

(Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 275–385). New York: Wiley.

McGraw-Hill. (1970). Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills. New York: Author.

10.

McGraw-Hill. (1970). Short Form of Academic Aptitude. New York: Author.

11.

Piers

E. V.

(1969). Manual for the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scales. Nashville: Counselor Recordings and Tapes.

12.

Piers

E. V.

(1977). The Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale: Research Monograph No. 1. Nashville: Counselor Recordings and Tapes.

13.

Piers

E. V.

, & Harris

D. B.

(1964). Age and other correlates of self-concept in children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 91–95.

14.

Rogers

B. S.

(1979). Effects of an enrichment program screening process on the self-concept and others' concept of gifted elementary children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.

15.

Rogers

, Smith

M. D.

, & Coleman

J. M.

(1978). Social comparison in the classroom: The relationship between academic achievement and self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 50–57.

16.

Selman

(1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.

17.

Shreve

E. E.

(1973). A critical analysis and evaluation of evidence regarding the reliability and validity of four selected measures of self-concept. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

18.

Smith

M. D.

(1980). Affective reactions to academic outcomes: A social comparison perspective. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.

19.

Smith

M. D.

, & Rogers

(1978). Reliability of standardized assessment instruments when used with learning disabled children. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1, 23–31.

20.

Smith

M. D.

, Zingale

, & Coleman

J. M.

(1978). The influence of adult expectancy/child performance discrepancies upon children's self-concepts. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 259–265.

21.

Stopper

C. J.

(1978). The relationships of the self-concept of gifted and nongifted elementary school students to achievement, sex, grade level, and membership in a self-contained academic program for the gifted. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

22.

Strang

, Smith

M. D.

, & Rogers

C. M.

(1978). Social comparison, multiple reference groups, and the self-concepts of academically handicapped children before and after mainstreaming. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 487–497.