This paper examines various aspects of tort liability in special education. Elements of negligence and other legal concerns are considered in view of the evolving trend to educate severely handicapped persons in integrated, community based settings. Duty, care, risk, and appropriate placement and instruction are discussed. Finally, recommendations for avoiding teacher liability are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, K. (1980). School law.St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
2.
Association for Retarded Citizens, National R&D Institute. (1983). Position statements on programmatic issues. Unpublished manuscript. Arlington, TX: Author.
3.
Bellamy, G. T., & Wilcox, B. (1980). Secondary education for severely handicapped students: Guidelines for quality services. In B. Wilcox & A. Thompson (Eds.), Critical issues in educating autistic children and youth (pp. 241–261.). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
4.
Biklen, D. (1981). The Supreme Court v. Retarded Children. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6(2), 3–5.
5.
Brady, M. P., & Gunter, P. (in press). Integrating moderately and severely handicapped students: Strategies that work.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
6.
Brown, L., Branston, M. B., Hamre-Nietupski, S., Pumpian, I., Certo, N., & Gruenewald, L. (1979). A strategy for developing chronological age appropriate and functional curricular content for severely handicapped adolescents and young adults. Journal of Special Education, 13(1), 81–90.
7.
Brown, L., Nietupski, J., & Hamre-Nietupski, S. (1976). The criterion of ultimate functioning and public school services for severely handicapped students. In M. A. Thomas (Ed.), Hey, don't forget about me: Education's investment in the severely, profoundly, and multiply handicapped (pp. 2–15). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
8.
Brown, L., Wilcox, B., Sontag, E., Vincent, L., Dodd, N., & Gruenewald, L. (1977). Toward the realization of the least restrictive educational environments for severely handicapped students. AAESPH Review, 2(4), 195–201.
9.
Connors, E. T. (1981). Educational tort liability and malpractice.Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa.
10.
Dennis, H. F., McLean, B. M., & Ball, M. W. (1980). Teachers' liability under the law: Multimedia program for administrators and teachers.Northbrook, IL: Hubbard (multimedia package).
11.
Falvey, M., Brown, L., Lyon, S., Baumgart, D., & Schroeder, J. (1980). Strategies for using cues and correction procedures. In W. Sailor, B. Wilcox, & L. Brown (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 109–134). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
12.
Haring, N., Liberty, K. A., & White, O. (1980). Rules for data based strategy decisions in instructional programs: Current research and instructional implications. In W. Sailor, B. Wilcox, & L. Brown (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students (pp. 159–194). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
13.
Henning, J. F., White, C., Sorger, M., & Stelzer, L. (1979). Mandate for change: The impact of law on educational innovation.Chicago: American Bar Association.
14.
Martin, R. (1975). Legal challenges to behavior modification: Trends in schools, corrections and mental health.Champaign, IL: Research Press.
15.
Martin, R. (1979). Educating handicapped children: The legal mandate.Champaign, IL: Research Press.
16.
Morgan, D. P. (1982). Parent participation in the IEP process: Does it enhance appropriate education?. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 3(2), 33–40.
17.
Perske, R. (1972). The dignity of risk and the mentally retarded. Mental Retardation, 10, 24–27.
18.
Prosser, W. L. (1971). Law of torts (4th ed). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing.
19.
Shrybman, J. A. (1982). Due proces in special education.Rockville, MD: Aspen.
20.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1981a). A review of research on interactions between severely handicapped and nonhandicapped students. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 6, 23–29.
21.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1981b). Preparing regular class teachers for the integration of severely handicapped students. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 16, 188–192.
22.
Strickland, R., Phillips, J. F., & Phillips, W. R. (1976). Avoiding teacher malpractice: A practical legal handbook for the teaching professional.New York: Hawthorne Books.
23.
Taylor, S. J. (1982). From segregation to integration: Strategies for integrating severely handicapped students in normal school and community settings. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(13), 42–49.
24.
Turnbull, H. R. (1982). Youngberg v. Romeo: An Essay. Journal of the Association for the Severely Handicapped, 7(3), 3–6.
25.
Turnbull, H. R., & Turnbull, A. P. (1978). Free appropriate public education: Law and implementation.Denver: Love.
26.
Vacca, R. S. (1974). Teacher malpractice. University of Richmond Law Review, 8, 447–457.
27.
Vitello, S. J. (1981). Mental retardation law in 1980: A review. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 16(3), 222–224.
28.
Voeltz, L. (1980). Childrens' attitudes toward handicapped peers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 84, 455–464.
29.
Voeltz, L. (1982). Effects of structured interactions with severely handicapped peers on childrens' attitudes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 380–390.
30.
Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services.Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation, York University Campus.
