AtkinsonR. C., & ShiffrinR. M.Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In SpencerK., & SpenceJ. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1968.
2.
BeckerW. C., & CarnineD. W.Direct instruction: A behavior theory model for comprehensive educational intervention with the disadvantaged. In BijouS. W., & RuisR. (Eds.), Behavior modification: Contributions to education.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,1981.
3.
BrownA. L.The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing, knowing how to know. In ReeseH. W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1975.
4.
BrownA. L., & DeLoacheJ. S.Skills, plans and self-regulation. In SieglerR.S. (Ed.), Children's thinking: What develops?Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,1978.
5.
BryantN. D., FayneH., & GettingerM.“LD efficient” instruction in phonics: Applying sound learning principles to remedial teaching (Technical Report 1). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, 1980. (a)
6.
BryantN. D., FayneH., & GettingerM.Applying the mastery model to sight word instruction for disabled readers (Technical Report 2). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, 1980. (b)
7.
BryantN. D.Manual for LD efficient reading instruction.New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities,1982.
8.
CortR. H.Effects of training on recall and use of organizational strategies by learning disabled and nondisabled youngsters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University, 1980.
9.
CraikF.I.M., & LockhartR. S.Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972, 11, 671–684.
10.
FayneH., & BryantN.D.The relative effect of various word synthesis strategies on the phonics achievement of learning disabled youngsters (Technical Report 5). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, 1980.
11.
FlavellJ. H.Developmental studies of mediated memory. In ReeseH. W., & LipsitL. P. (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1970.
12.
FleischnerJ. E., & GarnettK.Arithmetic learning disabilities: A literature review (Research Review Series 1979–1980, Vol. 4). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, 1979.
13.
FleischnerJ. E., GarnettK., & PreddyD.Mastery of basic number facts by learning disabled students: An intervention study (Technical Report 17). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, 1982.
14.
FleischnerJ. E., GarnettK., & ShepherdM. J.Proficiency in arithmetic basic fact computation of learning disabled and nondisabled children (Technical Report 9). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, 1980.
15.
FleischnerJ. E., NuzumM., & GarnettK.Strategic behavior in computation of basic facts: Are LD students different? In preparation.
16.
GelzheiserL. M.The effect of direct instruction on learning disabled children's ability to generalize study behaviors for deliberate memory tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1982.
GuskeyT. R.Mastery learning: Applying the theory.Theory Into Practice, 1981, 19(1), 104–110.
19.
KailR.The development of memory in children.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company,1979.
20.
KimmelS., & MacGinitieW.Children with a perseverative text interpretation strategy: The effect of text organization (Technical Report 13). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, 1981.
21.
KintschW., & van DijkT.A.Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review, 1978, 85, 363–394.
22.
LindsayP. H., & NormanD. A.Human information processing: An introduction to psychology (2nd Ed.). New York: Academic Press, 1977.
23.
NewellA., & SimonH. A.Human problem solving.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall,1972.
24.
NuzumM.The effects of a curriculum based on the information processing paradigm on the arithmetic problem solving performance of four learning disabled students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University,1982.
25.
NuzumM., & FleischnerJ. E.Teaching arithmetic story problem solving skills to LD students. In preparation.
26.
RathmellE. C.Using thinking strategies to learn the basic facts. In SuydamM. (Ed.), 1978 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Reston, VA: NCTM,1978.
27.
ResnickL. B., & FordW. W.The psychology of mathematics for instruction.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,1981.
28.
RohwerW. D.Jr., RainesJ. M., EoffJ., & WagnerM.The development of elaborate propensity during adolescence.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977, 23, 472–492.
29.
ShepherdM. J., FrankB., SolarR. A., & GelzheiserL. M.Progress Report.New York: Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, Teachers College, Columbia University, May,1982.
30.
SilbertJ., CarnineD., & SteinM.Direct instruction mathematics.Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company,1981.
31.
SolarR. A.The performance of LD and ND adolescents on a paired associate task.New York: Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, Teachers College, Columbia University. In progress.
32.
SpiroR. J.Etiology of reading comprehension style (Technical Report 124). Urbana: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading, 1979.
33.
ThorntonC. A.Emphasizing thinking strategies in basic fact instruction.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1978, 214–227.
34.
WilliamsJ. P., & TaylorM. B.Factors in the comprehension of expository text in normally achieving and learning-disabled children.New York: Research Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities, Technical Report 18, 1982.