Alberta Psychological Association.Guidelines for the use of behavior modification.Alberta Psychology, 1981, 10, 13.
2.
AndersonW. (Ed.) Ballentine's law dictionary.San Francisco: Bancroft-Whitney,1969.
3.
Arizona Law Review, Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona College of Law Press, 1975, 17.
4.
AzrinN.H., & HoltzW.C.Punishment. In HonigW.K. (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts (Prentice-Hall),1966.
5.
BrazierB., & MacDonaldL.Ethical decision-making in behavioral programming: A continuum of procedures.Journal of Practical Approaches to Developmental Handicap, 1981, 4, 11–13.
6.
BuddK.S., & BaerD.M.Behavior modification and the law: Implications of recent judicial decisions.The Journal of Psychiatry & the Law, 1976, 171–244.
7.
CookJ.W., AltmanK., & HaavikS.Consent for aversive treatment: A model form.Mental Retardation, 1978, 16, 47–51.
8.
CorteH.E., WolfM.M., & LakeB.J.A comparison of procedures for eliminating self-injuries of retarded adolescents.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1971, 4, 201–213.
9.
Davis v. Watkins, 384 F. Supp. 1196 (1974).
10.
FavellJ.E., McGimseyJ.F., & JonesM.L.The use of physical restraint in the treatment of self-injury and as positive reinforcement.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1978, 11, 225–241.
11.
FriedmanP.R.Legal regulations of applied behavior analysis in mental institutions and prisons.Arizona Law Review, 1975, 17, 30–104.
12.
GoldiamondI.Singling out behavior modification for legal regulation: Some effects on patient care, psychotherapy, and research in general.Arizona Law Review, 1975, 17, 105–126.
13.
Horacek v. Exon, CA No. 72-L-299 (1975).
14.
MartinR.Legal challenges to behavior modification.Champaign, IL: Research Press,1975.
15.
MartinR.Legal challenges in regulating behavior change.Champaign, IL: Research Press,1979.
16.
Morales v. Turman, 364 F. Supp. 166 (1973).
17.
New York State Association for Retarded Children v. Carey, 393 F. Supp. 715 (E.D.N.Y. 1975).
18.
New York State Association for Retarded Children v. Rockefeller, 357 F. Supp. 752 (1973).
19.
NolleyD., BoelkinsD., KocurL., MooreM.K., GoncalvesS., & LewisM.Aversive conditioning within laws and guidelines in a state facility for mentally retarded individuals.Mental Retardation, 1980, 18, 295–298.
20.
Pena v. New York State Department of Social Services, 322 F. Supp. 473 (1970).
21.
ReppA.C., & DeitzD.E.D.On the selective use of punishment-Suggested guidelines for administrators.Mental Retardation, 1978, 16, 250–254.
22.
RisleyT.R.Certify procedures not people. In WoodW. (Ed.), Issues in evaluating behavior modification.Champaign, IL: Research Press,1975.
23.
RisleyT.R.The effects and side-effects of punishing the autistic behaviors of a deviant child.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 21–34.
24.
RobinsonD.Therapies: A clear and present danger.American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 129–133.
25.
Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962).
26.
Rouse v. Cameron, 373 F. 2d 451 (1966).
27.
Shepards, Inc.Shepards Citation Index.Colorado Springs, CO: Author,1979.
StoltzS.B.Why no guidelines for behavior modification.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1977, 10, 541–547.
30.
Sulzer-AzaroffB., & MayerG.R.Applying behavior-analysis procedures with children and youth.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston,1977.
31.
SwitzkyH.N., & MillerT.The least restrictive alternative.Mental Retardation, 1978, 16, 52–54.
32.
TateB.G., & BaroffG.S.Aversive control of self-injurious behavior in a psychotic boy.Behavior Research and Therapy, 1966, 4, 281–287.
33.
ThompsonT., & GrabowskiJ.Ethical and legal guidelines for behavior modification. In ThompsonT., & GrabowskiJ. (Eds.), Behavior modification of the mentally retarded.New York: Oxford University Press,1977.
34.
TurnbullH.R. (Ed.). Consent handbook.Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Deficiency,1978.
35.
Usen v. Sipprell, 342 N.Y.S. 2d 599, 41 A.D. 2d 251 (1973).
36.
Welsch v. Likins, 373 F. Supp. 487, affirmed 525 F. 2d 987 (1974).
37.
Wheeler v. Glass, 473 F. 2d 983 (1973).
38.
Wyatt v. Stickney, 325 F. Supp. 781 (1971); 334 F. Supp. 1341 (1971); 344 F. Supp. 373 (1972); 344 F. Supp. 387 (1972).
39.
YeakelM.H., SalisburyL.L., GreerS.L., & MarcusL.F.An appliance for autoinduced aversive control of self-injurious behavior.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1970, 10, 159–169.