Research agenda: finding ways to create more options for parent involvement

Agard J.A. , & Brannon R.W. . Special teens and parents: A study of the impact of P.L. 94-142 on learning disabled adolescents (U.S. Department of Education Contract No. 300-78-0462). Cambridge, Mass.: Abt Associates, 1980.

Agard J.A. , Hoff M.K. , Lewis L. , Mopsik S. , & Brannon R. . Identifying strategies for assisting LEAs and SEAs to meet procedural safeguards afforded to handicapped children and their parents. Washington, D.C.: Abt Associates, 1979.

Brightman A.J. , & Sullivan M.B. . The impact of Public Law 94-142 on parents of disabled children: A report of findings. Belmont, Mass.: Cambridge Workshop, 1980.

Budoff M. , & Orenstein A. . Due process in special education: The hearing process. Cambridge, Mass.: Ware Press, 1981. (a)

Budoff M. , & Orenstein A. . Special education appeals hearings: Are they fair and are they helping? Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1981, 2(2), 37–48. (b)

Button C. . Highlights of mediation study. Unpublished manuscript, 1981. (Available from National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Washington, D.C.)

Davis F.J. , & Heyl B.S. . The Illinois state study of the impact of P.L. 94-142 on the families of children with different handicapping conditions (U.S. Department of Education Contract No. 300-78-0461). Normal: Illinois State University, 1980.

Goldstein S. , & Turnbull A.P. . Strategies to increase parent participation in IEP conferences. Exceptional Children, 1982, 48, 360–361.

Halpem R. , & Parker-Crawford F. . Final report: Year 2 of operation (October 1, 1979 to September 30, 1980) study of the impact of P.L. 94-142 on the handicapped child and family: Institutional responses and their consequences. Ypsilanti, Mich.: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, 1980.

Hoff M.K. , Fenton K.S. , Yoshida R.K. , & Kaufman M.J. . Notice and consent: The school's responsibility to inform parents. Journal of School Psychology, 1978, 16, 265–273.

Kotin L. , & Eager N. . Due process in special education: A legal analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Research Institute for Educational Problems, 1977.

Minnesota State Department of Education. The impact of procedural due process on how school staff spend their time. St. Paul: Minnesota State Department of Education, Division of Special and Compensatory Education, 1981.

Peterson G.P. , & Ayer S.B. . The cost of special education due process fair hearings and appeals in California (California State Department of Education Grant No. 57-B201-80-3293-7101). Walnut Creek, Calif.: Decision Development Corporation, 1980.

Turnbull A.P. , & Turnbull H.R. . Parental involvement in the education of handicapped children: A critique. Mental Retardation, in press.

U.S. Department of Education. Third annual report to Congress on the implementation of Public Law 94-142: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1981.

U.S. Department of Education. Fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of Public Law 94-142: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act. Washington, D.C: Author, 1982.

Yoshida R.K. . Developing assistance linkages for parents of handicapped children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood Education, 1979, 1(1), 83–89.

Yoshida R.K. , & Byrne P. . Mediation in special education: The right idea in the wrong form? School Administrator, 1979, 36(5), 18–19.

Yoshida R.K. , & Gottlieb J. . A model of parental participation in the pupil planning process. Mental Retardation, 1977, 15(3), 17–20.

Yoshida R.K. , Schensul J.J. , Pelto P.J. , & Fenton K.S. . The principal and special education placement. National Elementary Principal, 1978, 58(1), 34–38.

Yurchak M.J. , & Mathews R.O. . The Huron study of the quality of educational services provided to handicapped children from the perspective of the child, the family, and school personnel. Cambridge, Mass.: Huron Institute, 1980.