Parental participation,school accountability,and due process

Budoff M. . Implementing due process safeguards: From the user's point of view. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education (Ed.), Due process: Developing criteria for the evaluation of due process procedural safeguards provisions. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, 1979.

Budoff M. , & Orenstein A. . Special education appeals hearings: Are they fair and are they helping? Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1981, 2(2), 34–48.

Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education. View from the panel. In, Due process: Developing criteria for the evaluation of due process procedural safeguards provisions. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, 1979.

Farber B. , & Lewis M. . The symbolic use of parents: A sociological critique of educational practice. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1975, 8(21), 34–42.

Goldstein S. , Strickland B. , Turnbull A.P. , & Curry L. . An observational analysis of the IEP conference. Exceptional Children, 1980, 46, 278–285.

Hutchinson D.H. . Has Chapter 766 accomplished its goals? The views of parents of children with special needs (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 1978). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978, 39, 2180A. (University Microfilm No. 78-18, 007)

Kagan S.L. , & Schraft C.M. . Bringing parents and schools together: A comparative study of the experiences of low and middle income parents in two urban elementary schools (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University Teachers College, 1979). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1979, 40, 1992A. (University Microfilm No. 79-23, 620)

Kirp D.L. , Kuriloff P.J. , & Buss W.G. . Legal mandates and organizational change. In Hobbs N. (Ed.), Issues in the classification of children (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1975.

Lay C.A. . Due process in special education (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1977). Dissertation Abstracts International, 1977, 37, 7687A. (University Microfilm No. 77-11, 368)

Mitchell S. . Parental perceptions of their experiences with due process in special education: A preliminary report. Report in a symposium entitled “Due Process in Special Education” presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, April 1976.

National Association of State Directors in Special Education. The implementation of due process in Massachusetts. Washington, D.C.: Author, 1978.

Shrybman J. , & Mastsoukas G. . The principal and the special education hearing. National Elementary Principal, 1978, 58(1), 30–33.

Silberberg N.G. . Schools have home court advantage. Amicus, 1979, 4(2), 89–90.

Strickland B. . Perceptions of parents and school representatives regarding their relationship before, during, and after the due process hearing. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1982, in preparation.

Turnbull H.R. , Turnbull A.P. , & Strickland B. . Due process: The two-edged sword that the untrained should not unsheath. Journal of Education, 1979, 161(3), 40–59.

Yoshida R. K. . Developing assistance linkages for parents of handicapped children. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, 1979.

Yoshida R. , Fenton K. , Kaufman M.J. , & Maxwell J.P. . Parental involvement in the special education pupil planning process: The school's perspective. Exceptional Children, 1978, 44, 531–533.