AgardJ., & HoffM.The Abt special teens and parents study of PL 94–142's impact.Cambridge, Mass.: Abt Associates,1979.
2.
BlaschkeC.Case study of the implementation of P.L. 94–142.Washington, D.C.: Education Turnkey Systems,1979.
3.
CaplanN., MorrisonA., & StambaughR.J.The use of social science knowledge in policy decisions at the national level.Ann Arbor, Mich.: Institute for Social Research,1975.
4.
DunnL.M.Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 1968, 35, 5–22.
5.
EmrickJ. A., & PetersonS.A synthesis of findings across five recent studies of educational dissemination and change.Menlo Park, Calif.: SRI,1977.
KaufmannM., GottliebJ., AgardJ., & KukicM.Mainstreaming: Toward an explication of the construct. In MeyenE., VergasonG., & WhelanR. (Eds.), Alternatives for teaching exceptional children.Denver, Colo.: Love,1975.
8.
LewisL.Project IEP: Washington state report.Arlington, Va.: Nero and Associates,1977.
9.
MajoneG., & WildavskyA.Implementation as evolution. In FreemanH.E. (Ed.), Policy studies review annual (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills, Calif.: SAGE Publications, 1978.
10.
Management Analysis Center.Analysis of state data reporting capabilities.Washington, D.C., Author, 1977.
11.
NagelS., & NeefM.What's new about policy analysis research? In FreemanH.E. (Ed.). Policy studies review annual (Vol. 2). Beverly Hills, Calif.: SAGE Publications, 1978.
12.
NewkirkD., BlackD., & ShrybmanJ.Analysis of categorical definitions, diagnostic methods, diagnostic criteria and personnel utilization in the classification of handicapped children.Reston, Va.: Council for Exceptional Children,1978.
13.
NortonB.O.Project IEP: Wisconsin state report.Arlington, Va.: Nero and Associates,1977.
14.
PennyC.Project IEP: Alabama state report.Arlington, Va.: Nero and Associates,1977.
15.
PressmanJ.L., & WildavskyA.B.Implementation.Berkeley: University of California Press,1973.
16.
ReinM., & WhiteS.H.Can policy research help policy?The Public Interest, 1977, 49, 119–136.
17.
Roy Littlejohn Associates, Inc.Voices from the classroom: Teacher concerns with new legislation for serving handicapped children.Washington, D.C.: Author,1978.
18.
SagstetterK.Project IEP: New Jersey state report.Arlington Va.: Nero and Associates,1977.
19.
SemmelM.I., BallardM., & SemmelD.S.A university-county schools collaborative model demonstration program in LEA policy development and implementation of programs for handicapped pupils. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1980.
20.
SemmelM.I., GottliebJ., & RobinsonN.M.Mainstreaming: Perspectives on educating handicapped children in the public school. In BerlinerD. (Ed.), Review of research in education, 1979, 7, 223–279.
21.
StearnsM., NorwoodC., KaskowitzD., & MitchellS.Validation of state counts of handicapped children (2 vol.). Menlo Park, Calif.: SRI International, 1977.
22.
StokeyE., & ZeckhauserR.A primer for policy analysis.New York: Norton, 1978.
23.
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Progress toward a free appropriate public education: A report to Congress on the implementation of Public Law 94–142: The Education of All Handicapped Children Act.Washington, D.C.: Author, January 1979.
24.
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Progress toward a free appropriate public education: Semiannual update on the implementation of Public Law 94–142: The Education for All Handicapped Children Act.Washington, D.C.: Author, August 1979.
WeissC.H.Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social research.Policy Analysis, 1977, 3, 531–546.
27.
WildavskyA.Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis.Boston: Little, Brown,1979.
28.
YurchakM., MathewsR., & BanderD.The Huron study of the quality of educational services provided to handicapped children from the perspective of the child, the family, and school personnel: Interim report of findings.Cambridge, Mass.: The Huron Institute,1979.