Student voice research in special and inclusive education is more than an academic pursuit; it is a call to action for reimagining education where students are active agents in shaping their schooling experiences. This commentary builds on the contributions of the papers in this special issue, which collectively highlight the importance of student voice in disrupting adultism, informing teacher practice, and challenging systemic inequities, particularly for multiply marginalized disabled students. We examine the methodological tensions and opportunities in student voice research, emphasizing the need for theoretically grounded conceptualizations of disabled student voice, contextualized and creative methodologies, and purpose-driven and relational research. Ultimately, we argue that student voice research is not just about listening to youth: it is about shifting historical power, a relational dynamic, and future-making work that turns to students as knowledgeable contributors to improving our educational system.
BertrandM.DeolindoT. F.GarciaL. W.DomínguezA. D. (2024). Youth leadership and intersectionality: Which youth have a say in school decision-making?Urban Education, 60(7), 2088–2120. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859241279457
4.
BertrandM.RodelaK. C. (2018). A framework for rethinking educational leadership in the margins: Implications for social justice leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(1), 10–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775117739414
5.
BrasofM.LevitanJ. (Eds.). (2022). Introduction: Student voice: Reframing school change by repositioning educational research. In BrasofM.LevitanJ. (Eds.), Student voice research: Theory, methods, and innovations from the field (pp. 1–12). Teachers College Press.
6.
CannonM. A.Hernández-SacaD. I. (2024). “Storying” from special education classroom: Centering voices from accessible-interdependence-intimacy as interdisciplinary justice in pedagogical practices. Theory Into Practice, 63(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2024.2355840
7.
CavendishW.ConnorD.GonzalezT.Jean-PierreP.CardK. (2020). Troubling “the problem” of racial overrepresentation in special education: A commentary and call to rethink research. Educational Review, 72(5), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1550055
8.
ChandlerE.AubrechtK.IgnagniE.RiceC. (2021). Cripistemologies of disability arts and culture: Reflections on the cripping the arts symposium. Studies in Social Justice, 15(2), 170–179. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v15i2.2429
9.
ConnerJ. (2021). Educators’ experiences with student voice: How teachers understand, solicit, and use student voice in their classrooms. Teachers and Teaching, 28(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.2016689
10.
Cook-SatherA. (2020). Student voice across contexts: Fostering student agency in today’s schools. Theory into Practice, 59(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091
11.
CruzR. A.RodlJ. E. (2018). An integrative synthesis of literature on disproportionality in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 52(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918758707
12.
de los RíosC.PatelL. (2023). Positions, positionality, and relationality in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(6), 883–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/714858243
13.
FoleyD. (1996). The silent Indian as a cultural production. In LevinsonA.FoleyD.HollandD. (Eds.), The cultural production of the educated person (pp.79–91). State University of New York Press.
14.
GarciaA.MirraN. (2023). Other suns: Designing for racial equity through speculative education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 32(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2023.2166764
15.
GonzálezT. E.Hernandez-SacaD. I.ArtilesA. J. (2017). In search of voice: Theory and methods in K-12 student voice research in the US, 1990–2010. Educational Review, 69, 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1231661
16.
HamraieA. (2017). Building access: Universal design and the politics of disability. University of Minnesota Press.
17.
Hernández-SacaD. I.Gutmann KahnL.CannonM. A. (2018). Intersectionality dis/ability research: How dis/ability research in education engages intersectionality to uncover the multidimensional construction of dis/abled experiences. Review of Research in Education, 42(1), 286–311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18762439
18.
JohnsonM. L.McRuerR. (2014). Cripistemologies: Introduction. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8(2), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2014.12
19.
JohnsonM. L.McRuerR. (2024). Cripistemologies now (more than ever!). Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 18(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2024.1
20.
KlarE.WolfondA. (2021). Neurodiversity in relation: Artistic intraethnographic practice. In LesterJ. N.NusbaumE. A. (Eds.), Centering diverse bodyminds in critical qualitative inquiry (pp. 21–35). Routledge.
21.
LauterbachA. A.BettiniE.MathewsH. M.RossettiZ.HughesO. E. (2022). Beyond exploratory: How varied qualitative methodologies can inform and advance the field of special education. In FarmerT. W.TalbottE.McMasterK.LeeD.AcevesT. C. (Eds.), Handbook of Special Education Research, Volume I (pp. 171–186). Routledge.
22.
LesterJ. N.NusbaumE. A. (Eds.). (2021). Centering diverse bodyminds in critical qualitative inquiry. Routledge.
23.
McKinney de RoystonM.VakilS.NasirN.RossK. M.GivensJ.HolmanA. (2017). “He’s more like a brother than a teacher:” Revealing instructor’s politicized caring in a program for African American males. Teachers College Record, 119(4), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811711900401open_in_new
24.
MillerA. L.KurthJ. A. (2021). Photovoice research with disabled girls of color: Exposing how schools (re)produce inequities through school geographies and learning tools. Disability & Society, 37(8), 1362–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1881883
25.
MillerA. L.PearsonH. (2024). Unearthing and reconstructing schooling with multiply-marginalized disabled students through an intersectional sociospatial lens. Race Ethnicity and Education, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2024.2386940
26.
NelsonE.CharterisJ. (2021). Student voice research as a technology of reform in neoliberal times. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1713867
27.
NxumaloF.NayakP.TuckE. (2022). Education and ecological precarity: Pedagogical, curricular, and conceptual provocations. Curriculum Inquiry, 52(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2022.2052634
28.
PazeyB. L.DeMatthewsD. (2019). Student voice from a turnaround urban high school: An account of students with and without dis/abilities leading resistance against accountability reform. Urban Education, 54(7), 919–956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916666930
29.
ProffittW. A.McCallZ.RathS.MatusevichH. A. (2025). Trust the experts: Advancing student voice in special education teacher preparation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 159, 105002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105002
30.
QR Collective. (2023). Reflexive quality criteria: Questions and indicators for purpose-driven special education qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231168106
SitterK. C.GrittnerA. L. (2021). When participatory approaches are inaccessible: A movement toward research engagement through multi-sensory storytelling. In LesterJ. N.NusbaumE. A. (Eds.), Centering diverse bodyminds in critical qualitative inquiry (1st ed., pp. 37–48). Routledge.
33.
SpyrouS. (2024). From extractivist practices and the child-as-data to an ethics of reciprocity and mutuality in empirical childhood research. Childhood, 31(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/09075682231220158
34.
TuckE.YangK. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414530265
35.
WaitollerF. R.ThoriusK. K. (Eds.). (2022). Sustaining disabled youth: Centering disability in asset pedagogies. Teachers College Press.
36.
WinnM.WinnL. (2016). “We want this to be owned by you.” The promise and perils of youth participatory action research. In GreeneS.BurkeK.McKennaM. (Eds.), Youth voices, public spaces, and civic engagement (pp.50–67). Routledge.
