This study examines the relationships between three accommodation strategies—Extended Time (ET) only, breaks only, and breaks bundled with ET—and academic performance, test-taking behavior, and attitudes among eighth-grade students with disabilities who participated in the 2017 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) mathematics assessment. Utilizing propensity score analysis to mitigate selection bias, the study finds that students receiving only breaks tend to exhibit lower performance and engagement compared to those receiving ET alone or those receiving breaks bundled with ET. In addition, results suggest that bundling breaks with ET is associated with lower performance compared to ET alone. These findings highlight the complexities of interactions between accommodations and support the need for reevaluating current accommodation policies to enhance their effectiveness for students with disabilities.
AbediJ.KaoJ. C.LeonS.SullivanL.HermanJ. L.PopeR.MastergeorgeA. M. (2008). Exploring factors that affect the accessibility of reading comprehension assessments for students with disabilities: A study of segmented text (CRESST Report No. 746). National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, University of California, Los Angeles. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED503290.pdf
2.
AlsterE. H. (1997). The effects of extended time on algebra test scores for college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949703000210
3.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.
BoltS. E.YsseldykeJ. (2008). Accommodating students with disabilities in large-scale testing. A comparison of differential item functioning (DIF) identified across disability types. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 26(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282907307703
6.
CahanS.NirelR.AlkobyM. (2016). The extra-examination time granting policy: A reconceptualization. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(5), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915616537
7.
CrawfordL.Ketterlin-GellerL. R. (2013). Middle school teachers’ assignment of test accommodations. The Teacher Educator, 48(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2012.740152
8.
DiCerboK.StanleyE.RobertsM.BlanchardJ. (2001, April). Attention and standardized reading test performance: Implications for accommodation [Paper presentation]. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Washington, DC.
9.
ElliottS. N.MarquartA. M. (2004). Extended time as a testing accommodation: Its effects and perceived consequences. Exceptional Children, 70(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290407000306
10.
FletcherJ.FrancisD.O’MalleyK.CopelandK.MehtaP.CaldwellC.KalinowskiS.YoungV.VaughnS. (2009). Effects of a bundled accommodations package on high-stakes testing for middle school students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 75(4), 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290907500404
11.
FuchsL.FuchsD.CapizziA. (2005). Identifying appropriate test accommodations for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 37(6), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17161/fec.v37i6.6812
12.
FurlanoR.GoodrichS.DarrW.GibbardK.HoJ. L.WangZ.PikeM. D.ProvencherY.ZhangI. Y.Vreeker-WilliamsonE. C.HausdorfP. A. (2021). Determining the appropriateness of extended time accommodations in standardized cognitive ability testing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 53(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000257
13.
GangulyR. (2010). Testing accommodations for students with emotional or behavioral disorders: A national survey of special education teachers. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 71, 1-186. http://search.proquest.com/docview/787893086/abstract
14.
GreggN.NelsonJ. M. (2012). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of extra time as a test accommodation for transitioning adolescents with learning disabilities: More questions than answers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(2), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409355484
15.
HarrisonJ. R.BunfordN.EvansS. W.OwensJ. S. (2013). Educational accommodations for students with behavioral challenges: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 83(4), 551–597. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313497517
16.
HarrisonJ. R.EvansS. W.BaranA.KhondkerF.PressK.NoelD.WassermanS.BelmonteC.MohlmannM. (2020). Comparison of accommodations and interventions for youth with ADHD: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of School Psychology, 80, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.05.001
17.
HarrisonJ. R.EvansS. W.ZatzJ.MehtaP.PatelA.SyedM.SoaresD.SwistackN.GriffithM.CusterB. A. (2022). Comparison of four classroom-based strategies for middle school students with ADHD: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Attention Disorders, 26(11), 1507–1519. https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547221081108
18.
HeQ.von DavierM. (2015). Identifying feature sequences from process data in problem-solving items with n-grams. In van der ArkA.BoltD.ChowS.DouglasJ.WangW. (Eds.), Quantitative psychology research (pp. 173–190). Springer.
19.
HjärneM. S. (2020). Just enough time to level the playing field: Time adaption in a college admission test. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(6), 941–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1788143
20.
Incucation Act, Pub. L. 108-446, 20 USC.
21.
IrwinV.ZhangJ.WangX.HeinS.WangK.RobertsA.YorkC.BarmerA.Bullock MannF.DiligR.ParkerS. (2021). Report on the Condition of Education 2021 (NCES 2021-144). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
22.
IvanovaM.MichaelidesM.EklöfH. (2020). How does the number of actions on constructed-response items relate to test-taking effort and performance?Educational Research and Evaluation, 26(5–6), 252–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2021.1963939
23.
JoakimS. E. (2015). Help me fail: A study on testing accommodations for students with disabilities in writing assessments. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 77(3E), 1–125. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1735801010/abstract
KernL.HetrickA. A.CusterB. A.CommissoC. E. (2019). An evaluation of IEP accommodations for secondary students with emotional and behavioral problems. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 27(3), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426618763108
26.
KongX. J.WiseS. L.BholaD. S. (2007). Setting the response time threshold parameter to differentiate solution behavior from rapid-guessing behavior. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(4), 606–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406294779
27.
LaiS. A.BerkeleyS. (2012). High-stakes test accommodations: Research and practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 35(3), 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948711433874
28.
LesauxN. K.PearsonM. R.SiegelL. S. (2006). The effects of timed and untimed testing conditions on the reading comprehension of adults with reading disabilities. Reading and Writing, 19, 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4714-5
29.
LewandowskiL.CohenJ.LovettB. J. (2013). Effects of extended time allotments on reading comprehension performance of college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(3), 326–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282912462693
30.
LinP.-Y. (2021). Teachers’ differentiated assessment practices for secondary students with exceptionalities: The more, the better?Journal of Disability Studies, 7(2), 64–74.
31.
LovettB. J.NelsonJ. M. (2021). Systematic review: Educational accommodations for children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 60(4), 448–457.
32.
MayA. L.StoneC. A. (2014). An initial investigation into the role of stereotype threat in the test performance of college students with learning disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education & Disability, 27(1), 89–106.
PeltierC.HarrisonJ. R. (2018). Selecting accommodations for mathematics assessments: Legal and practical considerations. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(4), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2018.1443425
38.
PohlS.UlitzschE.von DavierM. (2019). Using response times to model not-reached items due to time limits. Psychometrika, 84(3), 892–920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-019-09669-2
39.
PritchardA. E.KoriakinT.CareyL.BellowsA.JacobsonL.MahoneE. M. (2016). Academic resting accommodations for ADHD. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(2), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2016-V21-I2-7414
40.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
41.
RickeyK. M. (2005). Assessment accommodations for students with disabilities: A description of the decision-making process, perspectives of those affected, and current practices [Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Iowa.
42.
RogersC. M.ThurlowM. L.LazarusS. S.LiuK. K. (2019). A summary of the research on effects of test accommodations: 2015-2016 (NCEO Report 412). University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
43.
RosenbaumP.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
44.
SievertsenH. H.GinoF.PiovesanM. (2016). Cognitive fatigue influences students’ performance on standardized tests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(10), 2621–2624. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516947113
45.
SireciS. G.ScarpatiS. E.LiS. (2005). Test accommodations for students with disabilities: An analysis of the interaction hypothesis. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 457–490. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075004457
46.
WadleyM.LiljequistL. (2013). The effect of extended test time for students with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(3), 263–271.
47.
WalzL.AlbusD.ThompsonS.ThurlowM. (2000). Effects of a multiple day test administration on the performance of special education students (Minnesota Report No. 34). University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
48.
WeiX. (2024). Text-to-Speech technology and math performance: A comparative study of students with disabilities, English language learners, and their general education peers. Educational Researcher, 53(5), 285–295. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X241232995
49.
WeiX.ZhangS. (2024). Extended time accommodation and the academic, behavioral, and psychological outcomes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 57(4), 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194231195624
50.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 5.0).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
