Middle schoolers with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) typically have a trajectory of difficult outcomes (e.g., school dropout, incarceration). Growing evidence suggests that the continuum of behavioral competence to challenges is closely linked to students’ neurocognitive executive function (EF) capacities, perceived stress (e.g., peers, school), and ability to navigate stressful situations; yet research with students with or at risk for EBD in middle school and from racially/ethnically under-represented backgrounds is limited. With 118 middle schoolers from a predominantly Hispanic/Latinx school district in the southeastern United States, we found (a) EF group differences among students with or at risk for EBD compared with peers without significant behaviors and (b) perceived stress and stress-regulation skills were uniquely associated with students’ internalizing and externalizing behaviors. We discuss research and practice implications.
AchenbachT. M. (2009). The Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA): Development, findings, theory, and applications. Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, University of Vermont.
2.
AchenbachT. M.RescorlaL. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, University of Vermont.
3.
AdamE. K.HittnerE. F.ThomasS. E.VillaumeS. C.NwaforE. E. (2020). Racial discrimination and ethnic racial identity in adolescence as modulators of HPA axis activity. Development and Psychopathology, 32(5), 1669–1684. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095457942000111X
ArtilesA. J. (2022). Interdisciplinary inequality research in the E/BD field: Animating intersectionality, reflexivity, and equity. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 30(2), 154–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266221083922
6.
BergerM.SarnyaiZ. (2015). “More than skin deep”: Stress neurobiology and mental health consequences of racial discrimination. Stress, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3109/10253890.2014.989204
BlairC. (2014). Stress and the development of executive functions: Experiential canalization of brain and behavior. In ZelazoP.D.SeraM. (Eds.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology: Developing cognitive control processes: Mechanisms, implications, and interventions (Vol. 37, pp. 145–180). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118732373.ch5
9.
BradleyR.DoolittleJ.BartolottaR. (2008). Building on the data and adding to the discussion: The experiences and outcomes of students with emotional disturbance. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-007-9058-6
10.
BradshawC. P.BuckleyJ. A.IalongoN. S. (2008). School-based service utilization among urban children with early onset educational and mental health problems: The squeaky wheel phenomenon. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.169
11.
CampbellL. K.ScadutoM.Van SlykeD.NiarhosF.WhitlockJ. A.CompasB. E. (2009). Executive function, coping, and behavior in survivors of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34(3), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsn080
12.
CarrionV. G.WongS. S. (2012). Can traumatic stress alter the brain? Understanding the implications of early trauma on brain development and learning. Journal of Adolescent Health, 51(2), S23–S28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.010
13.
ChafouleasS. M.PickensI.GherardiS. A. (2021). Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs): Translation into action in K12 education settings. School Mental Health, 13(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09427-9
14.
CompasB. E.BoyerM. C. (2001). Coping and attention: Implications for child health and pediatric conditions. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 22(5), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200110000-00007
15.
CompasB. E.Connor-SmithJ. K.SaltzmanH.ThomsenA. H.WadsworthM. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87
16.
CompasB. E.JaserS. S.BettisA. H.WatsonK. H.GruhnM. A.DunbarJ. P.WilliamsE.ThigpenJ. C. (2017). Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143(9), 939–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000110
17.
CompasB. E.JaserS. S.DunbarJ. P.WatsonK. HBettisA. H.GruhnM. A.WilliamsE. K. (2014). Coping and emotion regulation from childhood to early adulthood: Points of convergence and divergence. Australian Journal of Psychology, 66(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12043
18.
Connor-SmithJ. K.CompasB. E.WadsworthM. E.ThomsenA. H.SaltzmanH. (2000). Responses to stress in adolescence: Measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 976–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.6.976
19.
CroneE. A.van der MolenM. W. (2004). Developmental changes in real life decision making: Performance on a gambling task previously shown to depend on the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25(3), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2503_2
20.
CummingM. M.BettiniE.PhamA. V.ParkJ. (2020). School-, classroom- and dyadic-level experiences: A literature review of their relationship with students’ executive functioning development. Review of Educational Research, 90(1), 47–94. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319891400
21.
CummingM. M.OblathR.QiuY.FrazierS.ZelzoP.FloresH.ParkJ. (2023). Executive function, stress, and academic performance among middle schoolers with and without behavior problems. Remedial and Special Education, 45(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325231176762
22.
CummingM. M.PolingD.PatwardhanI.OzenbaughI. (2022). Executive function in kindergarten and development of behavioral problems: Moderating role of positive parenting practices. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 60(3), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.01.008
23.
CummingM. M.PolingD.QiuY.PrykanowskiD.LumpkinsA.DaunicA.CorbettN.SmithS. W. (2022). Executive function profiles of kindergarteners and first graders at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 89(3), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221135573
24.
CummingM. M.SmithS. W.O’BrienK. (2019). Perceived stress, executive function, perceived stress regulation, and behavioral outcomes of adolescents with and without significant behavior problems. Psychology in the Schools, 56(9), 1359–1380. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22293
25.
CummingM. M.ZelazoP. D.SmithS. W.FloresH. (2022). Self-regulation and executive function as foundational to student success. In TalbottB.McMasterK.LeeD.FarmerT. (Eds.), Handbook of special education research: Theory, methods, & leveraging developmental processes (pp. 285–298). Routledge.
26.
CurtinS. C.HeronM. P. (2019). Death rates due to suicide and homicide among persons aged 10–24: United States, 2000–2017 (NCHS Publication N0. 352). National Center for Health Statistics. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/81944
27.
DuckworthA. L.YeagerD. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15584327
28.
DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P.DymnickiA. B.TaylorR. D.SchellingerK. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
29.
FarmerT. W.Gatzke-KoppL.LatendresseS. J. (2020). The development, prevention, and treatment of emotional and behavioral disorders: An interdisciplinary developmental systems perspective. In FarmerT. W.ConroyM. A.FarmerE. M. Z.SutherlandK. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research on emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 3–22). Routledge.
30.
FeiferS. G.RattanG. (2007). Executive functioning skills in male students with social-emotional disorders. International Journal of Neuroscience, 117(11), 1565–1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207450701239350
31.
FieldA. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
32.
GageN. A.AdamsonR.MacSuga-GageA. S.LewisT. J. (2017). The relation between the academic achievement of students with emotional and behavioral disorders and teacher characteristics. Behavioral Disorders, 43(1), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742917713211
33.
GayG. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
GoodmanR. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015
36.
GrantK. E.CompasB. E.StuhlmacherA. F.ThurmA. E.McMahonS. D.HalpertJ. A. (2003). Stressors and child and adolescent psychopathology: Moving from markers to mechanisms of risk. Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 447–466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.447
37.
GravesS. L.AstonC. (2017). A mixed-methods study of a social emotional curriculum for Black male success: A school-based pilot study of the brothers of Ujima. Psychology in the Schools, 55(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22088
38.
GreshamF. M.KernL. (2004). Internalizing behavior problems in children and adolescents. In RutherfordR. B.QuinnM. M.MathurS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 262–281). Guilford Press.
39.
GrimmE.AgrigoroaeiS.RohlederN.BeckerL. (2021). Executive functioning as a predictor of physiological and subjective acute stress responses in non-clinical adult populations: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 131, 1096–1115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.037
40.
Hahs-VaughnD. L.LomaxR. G. (2020). An introduction to statistical concepts. Routledge.
41.
HoxJ. J.MoerbeekM.Van de SchootR. (2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
42.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 20 U.S.C §1400. (2004).
43.
JacksonD. L. (2003). Revisiting sample size and number of parameter estimates: Some support for the N:q hypothesis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(1), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1001_6
44.
KaticB.AlbaL. A.JohnsonA. H. (2020). A systematic evaluation of restorative justice practices: School violence prevention and response. Journal of School Violence, 19(4), 579–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2020.1783670
45.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2018). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (11th ed.). Pearson.
46.
LewisK. M.DuBoisD. L.BavarianN.AcockA.SilverthornN.DayJ.JiP.VuchinichS.FlayB. R. (2013). Effects of Positive Action on the emotional health of urban youth: A cluster-randomized trial. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(6), 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.06.012
47.
ListonC.McEwenB. S.CaseyB. J. (2009). Psychosocial stress reversibly disrupts prefrontal processing and attentional control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 106, 912–917. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807041106
48.
MattisonR. E.HooperS. R.CarlsonG. A. (2006). Neuropsychological characteristics of special education students with serious emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 31(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290603100205
49.
MilesJ.ShevlinM. (2001). Applying regression and correlation: A guide for students and researchers. Sage.
50.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P. (2012). The nature and organization of individual differences in executive functions: Four general conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458
51.
MiyakeA.FriedmanN. P.EmersonM. J.WitzkiA. H.HowerterA.WagerT. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
52.
MorrisM. C.EvansL. D.RaoU.GarberJ. (2015). Executive function moderates the relation between coping and depressive symptoms. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.925545
53.
MuratoriP.BertacchiI.CatoneG.MannucciF.NocentiniA.PisanoS.LochmanJ. E. (2020). Coping Power Universal for middle school students: The first efficacy study. Journal of Adolescence, 79, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.014
54.
NelsonT. D.KidwellK. M.NelsonJ. M.TomasoC. C.HankeyM.EspyK. A. (2018). Preschool executive control and internalizing symptoms in elementary school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46, 1509–1520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0395-1
55.
NiggJ. T. (2017). Annual research review: On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58(4), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12675
PascualA. C.MoyanoN.RobresA. Q. (2019). The relationship between executive functions and academic performance in primary education: Review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01582
Rea-SandinG.KorousK. M.CausadiasJ. M. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of racial/ethnic differences and similarities in executive function performance in the United States. Neuropsychology, 35(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000715
60.
RewL.JohnsonK.YoungC. (2014). A systematic review of interventions to reduce stress in adolescence. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 35(11), 851–863. https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2014.924044
61.
RidenB. S.KummS.MagginD. M. (2021). Evidence-based behavior management strategies for students with or at risk of EBD: A mega review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 43(4), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211047947
62.
RobsonD. A.AllenM. S.HowardS. J. (2020). Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(4), 324–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000227
SchoemakerK.MulderH.DekovićM.MatthysW. (2013). Executive functions in preschool children with externalizing behavior problems: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(3), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-012-9684-x
65.
ShieldsG. S.SazmaM. A.YonelinasA. P. (2016). The effects of acute stress on core executive functions: A meta-analysis and comparison with cortisol. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 651–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.038
SlotkinJ.NowinskiC.HaysR.BeaumontJ.GriffithJ.MagasiS.GershonR. (2012). NIH Toolbox® scoring and interpretation guide. Northwestern University and National Institutes of Health.
68.
SmithS. W.DaunicA. P.AlginaJ.PittsD. L.MerrillK. L.CummingM. M.AllenC. (2017). Self-regulation for students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Preliminary effects of the I control curriculum. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 25(3), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426616661702
69.
SontagL. M.GraberJ. A. (2010). Coping with perceived peer stress: Gender-specific and common pathways to symptoms of psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 46(6), 1605–1620. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020617
70.
SontagL. M.GraberJ. A.Brooks-GunnJ.WarrenM. P. (2008). Coping with social stress: Implications for psychopathology in young adolescent girls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(8), 1159–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-008-9239-3
71.
SontagL. M.GraberJ. A.ClemansK. H. (2011). The role of peer stress and pubertal timing on symptoms of psychopathology during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(10), 1371–1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9620-8
TollS. W. M.Van der VenS. H. G.KroesbergenE. H.Van LuitJ. E. H. (2011). Executive functions as predictors of math learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(6), 521–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219410387302
74.
TwengeJ. M.CooperA. B.JoinerT. E.DuffyM. E.BinauS. G. (2019). Age, period, and cohort trends in mood disorder indicators and suicide-related outcomes in a nationally representative dataset, 2005–2017. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(3), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000410
ValcanD. S.DavisH.Pino-PasternakD. (2018). Parental behaviours predicting early childhood executive functions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 607–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9411-9
77.
WeintraubS.DikmenS. S.HeatonR. K.TulskyD. S.ZelazoP. D.BauerP. J.CarlozziN. E.SlotkinJ.BlitzD.Wallner-AllenK.FoxN. A.BeaumontJ. L.MungasD.NowinskiC. J.RichlerJ.DeocampoJ. A.AndersonJ. E.ManlyJ. J.BoroshB.. . . GershonR. C. (2013). Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox. Neurology, 80(11 Suppl. 3), S54–S64. https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872ded
78.
WeistM. D.EberL.HornerR.SplettJ.PutnamR.BarrettS.PeralesK.FairchildA. J.HooverS. (2018). Improving multitiered systems of support for students with “internalizing” emotional/behavioral problems. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(3), 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717753832
79.
WilliamsP. G.SuchyY.RauH. K. (2009). Individual differences in executive functioning: Implications for stress regulation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9100-0
ZelazoP. D.BlairC. B.WilloughbyM. T. (2016). Executive function: Implications for education. NCER 2017-2000. National Center for Educational Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED570880
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
