This study’s purpose was to examine the effects of the concrete-representational-abstract integrated (CRA-I) sequence on the performance of students who struggled with rational number concepts. Three students in southeastern U.S. fifth grade class participated in the study. The CRA-I intervention was grounded in the principles of explicit instruction and showed rational number concepts related to fractions and decimals using fraction blocks, number lines, base 10 blocks, and coins. Students learned about unit fractions, fraction magnitude, fraction equivalence, addition of fractions with unlike denominators, equivalent decimals, and notation of fractions as decimals. The researchers used a multiple probe across behaviors design and demonstrated a functional relation between CRA-I and three behaviors: decreased fraction estimation error, accuracy in adding fractions with unlike denominators, and accuracy writing fractions as decimals.
BaileyD. H.HansenN.JordanN. C. (2016). The codevelopment of children’s fraction arithmetic skill and fraction magnitude understanding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000152
2.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
ConnollyA. J. (2007). Key Math Diagnostic Assessment-3. Pearson.
5.
DartE. H.RadleyK. C. (2018). Toward a standard assembly of linear graphs. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000269
6.
EnnisR. P.LosinskiM. (2019). Intervention to improve fraction skills for students with disabilities: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 85(3), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918817504
7.
FloresM. M.HintonV. M.MeyerJ. M. (2020). Teaching elementary fraction concepts using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence. Remedial and Special Education, 41(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518795477
8.
FloresM. M.HintonV. M.TaylorJ. J. (2018). CRA fraction intervention for fifth grade students receiving tier two interventions. Preventing School Failure, 62(3), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1414027
9.
FloresM. M.MoranoS.MeyerJ. M.HintonV. (2022). Teaching fraction magnitude to elementary students. Journal of Education for Children Placed at Risk, 27(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1080/10824669.2021.2009346
10.
Foreman-MurayL.FuchsL. S. (2019). Quality of explanation as an indicator of fraction magnitude understanding. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 52(2), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775120
11.
FuchsL. S.SchumacherR. F.LongJ.NamkungJ.HamlettC. L.CirinoP. T.JordanN.SieglerR.GerstenR.ChangasP. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032446
12.
FuchsL. S.SterbaS. K.FuchsD.MaloneA. S. (2016). Does evidence-based fractions intervention address the needs of very low performing students?Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(4), 662–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1123336
13.
FuchsL. S.WangA. Y.PreaherK. J.MaloneA. S.FuchsD.PachmayrR. (2021). Addressing challenging mathematics standards with as-risk learners: A randomized controlled trial on the effects of fractions intervention at third grade. Exceptional Children, 87(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.177/0014402920924846
14.
HuntJ. H.Welch-PtakJ. J.SilvaJ. M. (2016). Initial understanding of fraction concepts evidenced by students with mathematics learning disabilities and difficulties: A framework. Learning Disability Quarterly, 39(4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948716653101
15.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J. (2021). A descriptive analysis of the error patterns observed in the fraction-computation solution pathways of students with and without learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46(2), 132–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508419872256
16.
HwangJ.RiccominiP. J.HwangS. Y.MoranoS. (2018). A systematic analysis of experimental studies targeting fractions for students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 34(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12187
17.
KauffmanA. S.KauffmanN. L. (2004). Kauffman Brief Intelligence Test (2nd ed.). Pearson.
18.
MaloneA. S.FuchsL. S. (2017). Error patterns in ordering fractions among at-risk fourth-grade students. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416629647
19.
MoranoS.FloresM. M.HintonV. M.MeyerJ. M. (2020). A comparison of concrete-representational-abstract-integrated fraction interventions for students with disabilities. Exceptionality, 28(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727328
20.
MoranoS.RiccominiP. J. (2020). Is a picture worth 1,000 words? Investigating fraction magnitude knowledge through analysis of student representations. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 46(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418820697
21.
PolitD. F.BeckC. T.OwenS. V. (2007). Is the ICV an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health, 30(4), 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20199
22.
PustejovskyJ. E. (2019). Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcomes. Psychological Methods, 24(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000179
23.
Riddle-JohnsonB.SchneiderM.StarJ. R. (2015). Not a one-way street: Bidirectional relations between procedural and conceptual knowledge of mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x
24.
RojoM.KingS.GersibJ.BryantD. P. (2022). Rational number interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 44(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221105520
25.
SieglerR. S.DuncanG. L.Davis-KeanP. E.DuckworthK.ClaessensA.EngelM.SusperreguyM. I.ChenM. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612440101
26.
StricklandT. K. (2016). Using CRA-I strategy to develop conceptual and procedural knowledge of quadratic expressions. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916673353
TarlowK. R. (2017). An improved rank correlation effect size statistic for single-case designs: Baseline Corrected Tau. Behavior Modification, 41(4), 427–467. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516676750
29.
TorbeynsJ.SchneiderM.XinZ.SieglerR. S. (2015). Bridging the gap: Fraction understanding is central to mathematics achievement in students from three different countries. Learning and Instruction, 37(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.03.002
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
