Factors Influencing Educational Equity in Online Instruction for Students During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Abstract

This qualitative study examined special education teachers’ perceptions of student success in online instruction during the COVID-19 pandemic school closures to isolate the key determinants in the differential student outcomes reported by the teachers. Data were collected from 16 teachers in the U.S. state of California using semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic coding. The six themes that emerged from the data were that the key determinants of student outcomes were variables related to teacher, school administrator, district, student, parent, and pedagogy. The study showed that underlying deficit thinking in school professionals, lack of planned support for those parents and students needing the most support, and limited range of teaching practices were responsible for the equity gap seen in the differential student outcomes. Recommendations include training school administrators, providing parent support to access technology, addressing needs of non-English speaking families, expanding pedagogical practices, and planning for students with the most extensive support needs.

Keywords

special education classroom qualitative research methodology electronic and information technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agran

Jackson

Kurth

J. A.

Ryndak

Burnette

Jameson

Zagona

Fitzpatrick

Wehmeyer

(2020). Why aren’t students with severe disabilities being placed in general education classrooms: Examining the relations among classroom placement, learner outcomes, and other factors. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919878134

Aguliera

Nightengale-Lee

(2020). Emergency remote teaching across urban and rural contexts: Perspectives on educational equity. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0100

Bratlinger

Jimenez

Klingner

Pugach

Richardson

(2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205

Charmaz

(2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE.

Executive Department, State of California. (2020). Executive order N-26-20. https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3.13.20-EO-N-26-20-Schools.pdf

Gallo

(2020). Reopening Washington schools 2020: Special education guidance. Washington Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction. https://www.k12.wa.us/sites/default/files/public/specialed/pubdocs/Reopening-WA-Schools-2020-SpEd-Guidance.pdf

García

Weiss

(2020, September 10). COVID-19 and student performance, equity, and US education policy: Lessons from pre-pandemic research to inform relief, recovery, and rebuilding. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/the-consequences-of-the-covid-19-pandemic-for-education-performance-and-equity-in-the-united-states-what-can-we-learn-from-pre-pandemic-research-to-inform-relief-recovery-and-rebuilding/

Greenway

McCollow

Hudson

R. F.

Peck

Davis

C. A.

(2013). Autonomy and accountability: Teacher perspectives on evidence-based practice and decision-making for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(4), 456–468. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24232503

10.

Hill

(2020, April 18). The pandemic is a crisis for students with special needs. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2020/04/special-education-goes-remote-covid-19-pandemic/610231/

11.

Iadarola

Pellecchia

Stahmer

Lee

H. S.

Hauptman

Hassrick

E. M.

Crabbe

Vejnoska

Morgan

Nuske

Luelmo

Friedman

Kasari

Gulsrud

Mandell

Smith

(2020). Mind the gap: An intervention to support caregivers with a new autism spectrum disorder diagnosis is feasible and acceptable. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00662-6

12.

Jordan

W. J.

(2010). Defining equity: Multiple perspectives to analyzing the performance of diverse learners. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 142–178. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09352898

13.

Josselson

(2013). Interviewing for qualitative inquiry: A relational approach. The Guilford Press.

14.

Kaden

(2020). COVID-19 school closure-related changes to the professional life of a K–12 teacher. Education Sciences, 10(6), Article 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060165

15.

Keefe

E. B.

Copeland

S. R.

(2011). What is literacy? The power of a definition. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3–4), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494811800824507

16.

Kim

J. Y.

Fienup

D. M.

(2022). Increasing access to online learning for students with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Special Education, 55(4), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466921998067

17.

Kimmons

(2020). Current trends (and missing links) in educational technology research and practice. TechTrends, 64(6), 803–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00549-6

18.

Klehm

(2014). The effects of teacher beliefs on teaching practices and achievement of students with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 37(3), 216–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406414525050

19.

Koehler

Mishra

(2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/29544/

20.

Krutka

D. G.

Heath

M. K.

Mason

L. E.

(2020). Technology won’t save us—A call for technoskepticism in social studies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 108–120. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/216737/

21.

Kurth

J. A.

Born

Love

(2016). Ecobehavioral characteristics of self-contained high school classrooms for students with severe cognitive disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916661492

22.

Lambert

Schuck

(2021). “The wall now between us”: Teaching math to students with disabilities during the COVID spring of 2020. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(3), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00568-8

23.

McLaughlin

M. J.

(2010). Evolving interpretations of educational equity and students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600302

24.

Milem

J. F.

Umbach

P. D.

Ting

M. P.

Hampton

R. L.

Gullotta

T. P.

(2004). Educating citizens for a diverse democracy: How students learn from diversity in college. In Hampton

R. L.

Gullotta

T. P.

(Eds.), Promoting racial, ethnic, and religious understanding in America (pp. 87–108). Child Welfare League Press.

25.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. SAGE.

26.

Parsons

M. B.

Rollyson

J. H.

Reid

D. H.

(2012). Evidence-based staff training: A guide for practitioners. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 5, 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391819

27.

Protonentis

Chordiya

ObeySumner

(2021). Centering the margins: Restorative and transformative justice as our path to social equity. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 43(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1868159

28.

Reed

A. S.

Francis

G. L.

Kinas-Jerome

(2022). The American rescue plan act funds and students with extensive support needs: Three considerations for technology access and use. Inclusive Practices, 1(3), 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/27324745211062519

29.

Ruppar

A. L.

(2017). “Without being able to read, what’s literacy mean to them?”: Situated beliefs about literacy for students with significant disabilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917697311

30.

Ruppar

A. L.

Dymond

S. K.

Gaffney

J. S.

(2011). Teachers’ perspectives on literacy instruction for students with severe disabilities who use augmentative and alternative communication. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36(3–4), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.2511/027494811800824435

31.

Ryndak

Jackson

L. B.

White

J. M.

(2013). Involvement and progress in the general curriculum for students with extensive support needs: K–12 inclusive-education research and implications for the future. Inclusion, 1(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-1.1.028

32.

Saldaña

(2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.

33.

Scott

L. A.

Taylor

J. P.

Bruno

Padhye

Brendli

Wallace

Cormier

C. J.

(2021). Why do they stay? Factors associated with special education teachers’ persistence. Remedial and Special Education, 43(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211014965

34.

Shaheen

N. L.

Watulak

S. L.

(2019). Bringing disability into the discussion: Examining technology accessibility as an equity concern in the field of instructional technology. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1566037

35.

Siuty

M. B.

(2019). Teacher preparation as interruption or disruption? Understanding identity (re) constitution for critical inclusion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.02.008

36.

Solórzano

D. G.

Yosso

T. J.

(2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800103

37.

Stenhoff

D. M.

Pennington

R. C.

Tapp

M. C.

(2020). Distance education support for students with autism spectrum disorder and complex needs during covid-19 and school closures. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(4), 211–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520959658

38.

Sugarman

Lazarín

(2020, September). Educating English Learners during the COVID-19 pandemic. Migration Policy Institute. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/english-learners-covid-19-pandemic-policy-ideas

39.

Tremmel

Myers

Brunow

D. A.

Hott

B. L.

(2020). Educating students with disabilities during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from Commerce Independent School District. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 39(4), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870520958114

40.

U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Supplemental fact sheet addressing the risk of COVID-19 in preschool, elementary and secondary schools serving children with disabilities. https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/frontpage/faq/rr/policyguidance/Supple%20Fact%20Sheet%203.21.20%20FINAL.pdf

41.

Valencia

R. R.

(2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203853214

42.

Williams

McIntosh

Russell

(2021). Equity in distance education during COVID-19. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 6(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2021.1