Professional Networks of Special Educators and Speech-Language Pathologists Working With Students Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Abstract

Supporting students with complex communication needs requires collaboration within and beyond the school system. Through a state-wide survey, this quantitative descriptive study used social network analysis to examine the professional networks and collaboration patterns of 325 special education teachers and 189 speech-language pathologists who worked with students with complex communication needs. Findings revealed wide variability in network size and function across these educators. Information is reported about collaborative partners, frequency of communication, perceptions of trust, and exchange of supports across relationships (i.e., informational, tangible, emotional supports). Teachers and speech-language pathologists who worked with students with access to high-tech augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) had larger professional networks than those whose students only used unaided AAC (e.g., gestures, signs) or low-tech AAC such as picture symbols. This research provides an important first look at AAC-related professional networks and collaboration patterns within these networks to inform future research and practice.

Keywords

AAC social network collaboration complex communication needs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andzik

N. R.

Chung

Y. C.

Doneski-Nicol

Dollarhide

C. T.

(2019). AAC services in schools: A special educator’s perspective. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 65(2), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1368909

Beukelman

D. R.

Light

J. C.

(2020). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs (5th ed.). Brookes.

Biggs

E. E.

(2022). Strengthening professional networks to serve students with autism who have communication needs. Intervention in School and Clinic. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F10534512221081250

Biggs

E. E.

Hacker

R. E.

(2021a). Ecological systems for students who use AAC: Stakeholders’ views on factors impacting intervention and outcomes. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 46(4), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F15407969211052309

Biggs

E. E.

Hacker

(2021b). Engaging stakeholders to improve social validity: Intervention priorities for students with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 37, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2021.1881824

Binger

Ball

Dietz

Kent-Walsh

Lasker

Lund

McKelvey

Quach

(2012). Personnel roles in the AAC assessment process. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 28(4), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2012.71679

Brady

N. C.

Bruce

S. S.

Goldman

Erickson

Mineo

Ogletree

Paul

Romski

M. A.

Sevcik

Siegel

Schoonover

Snell

Slyvester

Wilkinson

(2016). Communication services and supports for individuals with severe disabilities: Guidance for assessment and intervention. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.121

Bumble

J. L.

Carter

E. W.

Kuntz

E. M.

(2021). Examining the transition networks of secondary special educators: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211063485

Carolan

B. V.

(2013). Social network analysis and education: Theory, methods & applications. SAGE.

10.

Cole-Lade

G. M.

Bailey

L. E.

(2020). Examining the role of paraeducators when supporting children with complex communication needs: A multiple case study. Teacher Education and Special Education, 43(2), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0888406419852778

11.

Donato

Spencer

Arthur-Kelly

(2018). A critical synthesis of barriers and facilitators to the use of AAC by children with autism spectrum disorder and their communication partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(3), 242–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1493141

12.

Gebhardt

Schwab

Krammer

Gegenfurtner

(2015). General and special education teachers’ perceptions of teamwork in inclusive classrooms at elementary and secondary schools. Journal for Educational Research Online, 7(2), 129–146.

13.

Gee

Gonzalez

Cooper

(2020). Outcomes of inclusive versus separate placements: A matched pairs comparison study. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1540796920943469

14.

Griffiths

Addison

(2017). Access to communication technology for children with cerebral palsy. Paediatrics and Child Health, 27(10), 470–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2017.06.005

15.

Harris

P. A.

Taylor

Thielke

Payne

Gonzalez

Conde

J. G.

(2009). Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(2), 377–381.

16.

Heilmann

Bertone

(2021). Identification of gaps in training, research, and school-based practice: A survey of school-based speech-language pathologists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52(4), 1061–1079. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-20-00151

17.

Johnson

J. M.

Inglebret

Jones

Ray

(2006). Perspectives of speech language pathologists regarding success versus abandonment of AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610500483588

18.

Kleinert

Towles-Reeves

Quenemoen

Thurlow

Fluegge

Weseman

Kerbel

(2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught: Implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0014402914563697

19.

Kleinert

H. L.

(2020). Students with the most significant disabilities, communicative competence, and the full extent of their exclusion. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1540796919892740

20.

Light

McNaughton

Caron

(2019). New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 35(1), 26–41.

21.

Lin

(1999). Social networks and status attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.467

22.

Liou

Y. H.

Daly

A. J.

(2018). Evolving relationships of pre-service teachers: A cohort-based model for growing instructional practice through networks. In Yoon

Baker-Doyle

(Eds.), Networked by design (pp. 85–110). Routledge.

23.

Mandak

Light

(2018). Family-centered services for children with complex communication needs: The practices and beliefs of school-based speech-language pathologists. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1438513

24.

Marsden

P. V.

(2011). Survey methods for network data. In Scott

Carrington

P. J.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 370–388). SAGE.

25.

McCluskey

Lalkhen

A. G.

(2007). Statistics II: Central tendency and spread of data. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, 7(4), 127–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkm020

26.

Moolenaar

N. M.

(2012). A social network perspective on teacher collaboration in schools: Theory, methodology, and applications. American Journal of Education, 119(1), 7–39.

27.

Moolenaar

N. M.

Der-Martirosian

Liou

Y. H.

Daly

(2014). Accessing capital resources: Investigating the effects of teacher human and social capital on student achievement. Teachers College Record, 116(7), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600702

28.

Moorcroft

Scarinci

Meyer

(2019). A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to the provision and use of low-tech and unaided AAC systems for people with complex communication needs and their families. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 14(7), 710–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1499135

29.

Morin

K. L.

Ganz

J. B.

Gregori

E. V.

Foster

M. J.

Gerow

S. L.

Genç-Tosun

Hong

E. R.

(2018). A systematic quality review of high-tech AAC interventions as an evidence-based practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 34(2), 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2018.1458900

30.

Perry

B. L.

Pescosolido

B. A.

Borgatti

S. P.

(2018). Egocentric network analysis: Foundations, methods, and models (Vol. 44). Cambridge University Press.

31.

Sannen

De Maeyer

Struyf

De Schauwer

Petry

(2021). Connecting teacher collaboration to inclusive practices using a social network approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103182

32.

Sigafoos

Roche

Tait

(2021). Challenges in providing AAC intervention to people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. In Sigafoos

(Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication: Challenges and solutions (pp. 229–252). Plural Publishing.

33.

Stehle Wallace

Senter

Peterson

Dunn

K. T.

Chow

. (2022). How to establish a language-rich environment through a collaborative SLP–teacher partnership. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 54(3), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0040059921990690

34.

Test

D. W.

Fowler

C. H.

(2018). A look at the past, present, and future or rural secondary transition. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(2), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870517751607

35.

Towles-Reeves

Kearns

Flowers

Hart

Kerbel

Kleinert

Quenemoen

Thurlow

(2012). Learner characteristics inventory project report. National Center and State Collaborative, University of Minnesota.

36.

Tschannen-Moran

(2014). The interconnectivity of trust in schools. In Van Maele

Forsyth

Van Houtte

(Eds.), Trust and school life (pp. 57–81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8014-8_3

37.

Uthoff

S. A.

Zinkevich

Boenisch

Sachse

S. K.

Bernasconi

Ansmann

(2021). Collaboration between stakeholders involved in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) care of people without natural speech. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(6), 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1860918

38.

Yamamoto

S. H.

Alverson

C. Y.

(2022). Post-high school outcomes of students with autism spectrum disorder and students with intellectual disability: Utilizing predictive analytics and state data for decision making. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F17446295221100039

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB