Technology has been widely used to teach reading skills to students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but the quality of research backing up this practice has not yet been fully investigated. The purpose of this review was to examine the quality of research on technology-aided reading interventions for students with ASD and summarize study characteristics of research studies with meeting the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) design standards. A total of 31 studies using group design (n = 4) or single-case design (n = 27) were systematically aggregated, and 16 studies (52%) met the WWC design standards. Study features related to participants, intervention, technology usage, and outcome variables were synthesized for these 16 studies. Results indicated that two types of technology (i.e., computer, iPad) were used to deliver reading instruction through software programs or support interventionist-directed reading instruction. Finally, implications for research and practice are discussed.
*Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD.WoodL. (2014). Effects of systematic instruction and an augmentative communication device on phonics skills acquisition for students with moderate intellectual disability who are nonverbal. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 517–532.
2.
*Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD. M.WoodL.StangerC.PrestonA. I.Kemp-InmanA. (2016). Systematic instruction of phonics skills using an iPad for students with developmental disabilities who are AAC users. The Journal of Special Education, 50, 86–97. http://doi.org/f8w5ns
3.
*AlisonC.RootR. R.BrowderD. M.WoodL. (2017). Technology-aided shared story reading for students with autism who are English-language learners. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32, 91–101. http://doi.org/gf86sn
4.
Ari-Even RothD.MuchnikC.ShabtaiE.HildesheimerM. (2012). Evidence for atypical auditory brainstem responses in young children with suspected autism spectrum disorders. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 54, 23–29. http://doi.or/fr5ft8
5.
*ArmstrongT. K.HughesM. T. (2012). Exploring computer and storybook interventions for children with high functioning autism. International Journal of Special Education, 27, 88–99.
6.
BellgA. J.BorrelliB.ResnickB.HechtJ.MinicucciD. S.OryM.OgedegbeG.OrwigD.ErnstD.CzajkowskiS. (2004). Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH behavior change consortium. Health Psychology, 23, 443–451. http://doi.org/cnnwbv
7.
*BrowderD.RootJ.WoodL.AlisonC. (2017). Effects of a story-mapping procedure using the iPad on the comprehension of narrative texts by students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32, 243–255. http://doi.org/gck2tg
8.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS. Y.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408. http://doi.org/gqx7
9.
CohenJ. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. http://doi.org/dghsrr
10.
*ColemanM. B.CherryR. A.MooreT. C.ParkY.CihakD. F. (2015). Teaching sight words to elementary students with intellectual disability and autism: A comparison of teacher-directed versus computer-assisted simultaneous prompting. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53, 196–210. http://doi.org/f7h2gc
11.
*ColemanM. B.HurleyK. J.CihakD. F. (2012). Comparing teacher-directed and computer-assisted constant time delay for teaching functional sight words to students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 47, 280–292.
12.
DavidsonM. M.Ellis WeismerS. (2014). Characterization and prediction of early reading abilities in children on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 828–845.
13.
*El ZeinF.GevarterC.BryantB.SonS. H.BryantD.KimM.SolisM. (2016). A comparison between iPad-Assisted and teacher-directed reading instruction for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 28, 195–215. http://doi.org/f8drws
14.
Every Student Succeeds Act, 20 U.S C. § 6301 (2015).
15.
FrithU.SnowlingM. (1983). Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 329–342.
16.
*GanzJ. B.BolesM. B.GoodwynF. D.FloresM. M. (2014). Efficacy of handheld electronic visual supports to enhance vocabulary in children with ASD. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29, 3–12. http://doi.org/f5ttwm
17.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164.
18.
GoughP. B.TunmerW. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. http://doi.org/b7kc8f
19.
HooverW. A.GoughP. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160. http://doi.org/bxgvgg
20.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS. L.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–180.
21.
HuX.LeeG. T.TsaiY.YangY.CaiS. (2020). Comparing computer-assisted and teacher-implemented visual matching instruction for children with ASD and/or other DD. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 50, 2540–2555. http://doi.org/ggrwbc
22.
KagoharaD. M.van der MeerL.RamdossS.O’ReillyM. F.LancioniG. E.DavisT. N.SigafoosJ. (2013). Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156. http://doi.org/f4j2cx
23.
KazdinA. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
24.
KnightV.McKissickB. R.SaundersA. (2013). A review of technology-aided interventions to teach academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 43, 2628–2648.
25.
KnightV.SartiniE.SpriggsA. D. (2015). Evaluating visual activity schedules as evidence-based practice for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 157–1789. http://doi.or/f5dbrc
26.
*KnightV. F.WoodC. L.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M.O’BrienC. P. (2015). An exploratory study using science eTexts with students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30, 86–99. http://doi.org/f7bgdb
27.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). A one way components of variance model for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 671–679. http://doi.org/cwqkn6
28.
*LeeY.VailC. O. (2004). Computer-based reading instruction for young children with disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20, 5–18. http://doi.org/gqx8
29.
LindgrenK. A.FolsteinS. E.TomblinB.Tager-FlusbergH. (2009). Language and reading abilities of children with autism spectrum disorders and specific language impairment and their first-degree relatives. Autism Research, 2, 22–38.
30.
MacdonaldD.LukG.QuintinE. (2021). Early word reading of preschoolers with ASD, both with and without hyperlexia, compared typically developing preschoolers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 51, 1598–1612. http://doi.org/gqx9
31.
MayesS. D.CalhounS. L. (2003). Analysis of WISK-III, Stanford-Binet: IV, and academic achievement test scores in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 329–341. http://doi.org/fd29gr
32.
McIntyreN. S.SolariE. J.GrimmR. P.LerroL. E.GonzalesJ. E.MundyP. C. (2017). A comprehensive examination of reading heterogeneity in students with high functioning autism: Distinct reading profiles and their relation to autism symptom severity. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 1086–1101.
33.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & the PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264–269.
34.
*MorlockL.ReynoldsJ. L.FisherS.ComerR. J. (2015). Video modeling and word identification in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Child Language and Therapy, 3, 101–111. http://doi.org/gqzb
35.
NationK.ClarkeP.WrightB.WilliamsC. (2006). Patterns of reading ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 911–919. http://doi.org/d62drf
36.
National Reading Panel (U.S.) & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U.S.). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
37.
O’ConnorI. M.KleinP. D. (2004). Exploration of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 115–127. http://doi.org/ds53p2
38.
OdomS. L.Collet-KlingenbergL.RogersS. J.HattonD. D. (2010). Evidence-based practices for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(4), 275–282.
39.
OdomS. L.ThompsonJ. L.HedgesS.BoydB. A.DykstraJ. R.DudaM. A.. . . BordA. (2015). Technology-aided interventions and instruction for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 3805–3819. http://doi.org/f72h2x
40.
PenningtonR. C. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction for teaching academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25, 239–248. http://doi.org/ddkptd
41.
RickettsJ.JonesC. R. G.HappéF.CharmanT. (2013). Reading comprehension in autism spectrum disorders: The role of oral language and social functioning. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 807–816. http://doi.org/f4rd7z
42.
RootJ. R.StevensonB. S.DavisL. L.Geddes-HallJ.TestD. W. (2017). Establishing computer-assisted instruction to teach academics to students with autism as an evidence-based practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47, 275–284. http://doi.org/f9tq7d
43.
*SaadatziM. N.PenningtonR. C.WelchK. C.GrahamJ. H.ScottR. E. (2017). The use of an autonomous pedagogical agent and automatic speech recognition for teaching sight words to students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32, 173–183. http://doi.org/gf86sw
44.
*SerretS.HunS.ThümmlerS.PierronP.SantosA.BourgeoisJ.AskenazyF. (2017). Teaching literacy skills to French minimally verbal school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders with the serious game SEMA-TIC: An exploratory study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–16. http://doi.org/gbv65p
45.
ShaneH. C.AlbertP. D. (2008). Electronic screen media for persons with autism spectrum disorders: Results of a survey. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1499–1508. http://doi.org/fj3j82
46.
SimJ.WrightC. C. (2005). The Kappa statistics in reliability studies: Use, intepretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85(3), 257–268. http://doi.org/gftfqg
47.
*SmithB. R.SpoonerF.WoodC. L. (2013). Using embedded computer-assisted explicit instruction to teach science to students with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 433–443. http://doi.org/f4nbcw
48.
*SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.Kemp-InmanA.WoodL. (2014). Using an iPad2® with systematic instruction to teach shared stories for elementary-aged students with autism. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 39, 30–46.
49.
*SpoonerF.Kemp-InmanA.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.WoodL.Ley DavisL. (2015). Generalization of literacy skills through portable technology for students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40, 52–70.
50.
SteinbrennerJ. R.HumeK.OdomS. L.MorinK. L.NowellS. W.TomaszewskiB.SzendreyS.McIntyreN. S.Yücesoy-ÖzkanS.SavageM. N. (2020). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK.CoxA.FettingA.KucharczykS.SchultzT. R. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Children Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.
53.
*YawJ. S.SkinnerC. H.ParkhurstJ.TaylorC. M.BooherJ.ChambersK. (2011). Extending research on a computer-based sight-word reading intervention to a student with autism. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20, 44–54. http://doi.org/bpgkdj
