Although behavior analytic practices have been widely applied in schools to support students with disabilities, there remains limited guidance concerning utilization of these practices in inclusion-oriented schools and, more specifically, the role of the board certified behavior analyst in the provision of related services. The goal of this article is to encourage discussions among stakeholders hopefully leading to a clearer conceptualization and more effective utilization of behavior analytic practices in inclusion-oriented schools. In addition to discussing the conceptualization of behavior analytic services as a related service and the role of both board certified assistant behavior analysts and registered behavior technicians as paraprofessionals under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, we provide a set of guidelines for related services decision-making practices useful within a collaborative teamwork framework, including behavior analysts, and offer areas for future research.
Assistance to the States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with Disabilities, 34 C.F.R. §§ 300 and 301. (2006). U.S. Department of Education.
2.
BanksT.ObiakorF. E. (2015). Culturally responsive behavior supports: Considerations for practice. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(2), 83–90. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1054945.pdf
BradleyV.KnollJ. (1995). Shifting paradigms in services to people with disabilities. In KaranO.GreenspanS. (Eds.), Community rehabilitation for people with disabilities (pp. 5–19). Butterworth-Heinemann.
14.
BrockM. E.HuberH. B. (2017). Are peer support arrangements an evidence-based practice? A systematic review. Journal of Special Education, 51(3), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917708184
15.
BrodheadM. T. (2015). Maintaining professional relationships in an interdisciplinary setting: Strategies for navigating nonbehavioral treatment recommendations for individuals with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0042-7
16.
BrodheadM. T.QuigleyS. P.WilczynskiS. M. (2018). A call for discussion about scope of competence in behavior analysis. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11(4), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-00303-8
17.
CampbellP. H. (1987). The integrated programming team: An approach for coordinating professionals of various disciplines in programs for students with severe and multiple handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 12(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698701200204
18.
CarterE. W.HughesC. (2005). Increasing social interaction among adolescents with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers: Effective interventions. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30(4), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.4.179
19.
ChopraR. V.GiangrecoM. F. (2019). Effective use of teacher assistants in inclusive classrooms. In SchuelkaM.JohnstoneC.ThomasG.ArtilesA. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook on inclusion and diversity in education (pp. 193–207). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526470430.n18
20.
CihonT. M.CihonJ. H.BedientG. M. (2016). Establishing a common vocabulary of key concepts for the effective implementation of applied behavior analysis. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(2), 337–348.
21.
CookB. G.TankersleyM. G. (Eds.). (2013). Research-based practices in special education. Pearson.
DeochandN.FuquaR. W. (2016). BACB certification trends: State of the states (1999 to 2014). Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-016-0118-z
25.
DiGennaro ReedF. D.BlackmanA. L.ErathT. G.BrandD.NovakM. D. (2018). Guidelines for using behavioral skills training to provide teacher support. Teaching Exceptional Children, 50(6), 373–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918777241
26.
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 137 S. Ct. 988 (2017).
27.
GiangrecoM. F. (1994). Effects of a consensus-building process on team decision-making: Preliminary data. Physical Disabilities: Education and Related Services, 13(1), 41–56.
28.
GiangrecoM. F. (1996). Vermont interdependent services team approach: A guide to coordinating educational support services. Paul H. Brookes.
29.
GiangrecoM. F. (2000). Related services research for students with low incidence disabilities: Implications for speech-language pathologists in inclusive classrooms. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in the Schools, 31(3), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.3103.230
GiangrecoM. F. (2009). Critical issues brief: Concerns about the proliferation of one-to-one paraprofessionals. Council for Exceptional Children, Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543012.pdf
32.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.DennisR. (1991). Common professional practices that interfere with the integrated delivery of related services. Remedial and Special Education, 12(2), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259101200205
33.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.LuiselliT. E.MacFarlandS. Z. (1996a). Review of VISTA by representatives of national organizations (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED396490). University of Vermont, University Affiliated Program of Vermont.
34.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.LuiselliT. E.MacFarlandS. Z. (1996b). Support service decision-making for students with multiple service needs: Evaluation data. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 21(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699602100304
35.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.LuiselliT. E.MacFarlandS. Z. (1998a). Reaching consensus about educationally necessary support services: A qualitative evaluation of VISTA. Special Services in the Schools, 13(1–2), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v13n01_01
36.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.NelsonC. (1998b). Impact of planning for support services on students who are deaf-blind. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 92(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482x9809200105
37.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.NelsonC.YoungM. R.Kiefer-O’DonnellR. (1999). Improving support service decision-making: Consumer feedback regarding updates to VISTA. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46(4), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/103491299100443
38.
GiangrecoM. F.PrelockP.ReidR.DennisR.EdelmanS. (2000). Roles of related services personnel in inclusive schools. In VillaR.ThousandJ. (Eds.), Restructuring for caring and effective education: Piecing the puzzle together (2nd ed., pp. 360–388). Paul H. Brookes.
39.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. C.HurleyS. M. (2013). Revisiting personnel utilization in inclusion-oriented schools. Journal of Special Education, 47(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466911419015
40.
GilsonC. B.CarterE. W.BiggsE. E. (2017). Systematic review of instructional methods to teach employment skills to secondary students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42(2), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917698831
41.
HewardW. L. (2005). Twelve reasons why ABA is good for education and why those reasons have been insufficient. In HewardW. L.HeronT. E.NeefN. A.PetersonS. M.SainatoD. M.CartledgeG.GardnerR.PetersonL. D.HerschS. B.DardigJ. C. (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 239–251). Pearson.
42.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of2004, PL lDs-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq.
43.
JohnsonJ. W.McDonnellJ.HolzwarthV. N.HunterK. (2004). The efficacy of embedded instruction for students with developmental disabilities enrolled in general education classes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(4), 214–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007040060040301
44.
KellyA.TincaniM. (2013). Collaborative training and practice among applied behavior analysts who support individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(1), 120–131. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23879891
45.
KuntzE. M.CarterE. W. (2021). Effects of a collaborative planning and consultation framework to increase participation of students with severe disabilities in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 46(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796921992518
46.
MagginD. M.PustejovskyJ. E.JohnsonA. H. (2017). A meta-analysis of school-based group contingency interventions for students with challenging behavior: An update. Remedial and Special Education, 38(6), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517716900
47.
McLeskeyJ.MaheadyL.BillingsleyB.BrownellM.LewisT. (Eds.). (2018). High leverage practices for inclusive classrooms. Routledge.
48.
PenningtonR. C.AultM. J.SchmuckD. G.BurtJ.FergusonL. (2016). Frequency of mand instruction reported in behavioral, special education, and speech journals. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9(3), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0095-7
49.
RainforthB.York-BarrJ. (1997). Collaborative teamwork: Integrated therapy services in educational programs for students with severe disabilities (2nd ed.). Paul H. Brookes.
50.
RobinsonJ.GershwinT.LondonD. (2019). Maintaining safety and facilitating inclusion: Using applied behavior analysis to address self-injurious behaviors within general education classrooms. Beyond Behavior, 28(3), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295619870473
51.
SchwartzI. S. (2005). Inclusion and applied behavior analysis: Mending fences and building bridges. In HewardW. L.HeronT. E.NeefN. A.PetersonS. M.SainatoD. M.CartledgeG.GardnerR.PetersonL. D.HerschS. B.DardigJ. C. (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities (pp. 239–251). Pearson.
52.
SharmaU.SalendS. (2016). Teaching assistants in inclusive classrooms: A systematic analysis of international research. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(8), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n8.7
53.
ShepleyC.Grisham-BrownJ. (2019). Applied behavior analysis in early childhood education: An overview of policies, research, blended practices, and the curriculum framework. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 12(1), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0236-x
54.
SimonsenB.SugaiG. (2019). School-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports: A systems-level application of behavioral principles. In LittleS. G.Akin-LittleA. (Eds.), Behavioral interventions in schools: Evidence-based positive strategies (pp. 35–60). American Psychological Association.
55.
SpoonerF.McKissickB. R.KnightV. F. (2017). Establishing the state of affairs for evidence-based practices in students with severe disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 42(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916684896
56.
SpoonerF.RootJ. R.SaundersA. F.BrowderD. M. (2019). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751055
57.
SternatJ.MessinaR.NietupskiJ.LyonS.BrownL. (1977). Occupational and physical therapy services for severely handicapped students: Toward a naturalized public school service delivery model. In SontagE.SmithJ.CertoN. (Eds.), Educational programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped (pp. 263–278). Council for Exceptional Children—Division of Mental Retardation.
58.
TrumpC. E.PenningtonR. C.TraversJ. C.RingdahlJ. E.WhitesideE. E.AyersK. M. (2018). Applied behavior analysis in special education: Misconceptions and guidelines for use. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(6), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918775020
59.
WatkinsL.Ledbetter-ChoK.O’ReillyM.Barnard-BrakL.Garcia-GrauP. (2019). Interventions for students with autism in inclusive settings: A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(5), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000190
60.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(2), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1978.11-203
61.
YorkJ.GiangrecoM. F.VandercookT.MacdonaldC. (1992). Integrating support personnel in inclusive classrooms. In StainbackS.StainbackW. (Eds.), Curriculum considerations in inclusive classrooms: Facilitating learning for all students (pp. 101–116). Paul H. Brookes.
